LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 03-19-2008, 06:03 PM   #1
ahsiii
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: nc
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 19

Rep: Reputation: 0
What is the best Video card for Linux?


I have a Custom built system with amd64 x2 1gig ram, I messed up, by mistake and got a integrated motherboard with ati radeon x1250. however i intend to remedy this by buying a new video card.

I would like to know what is the best Video card to work with linux is, non-distro specific, I tend to like to test distro's as they come available, so generally speaking "best video card for Linux" If you could share your experience with video cards.

Thank you very much in advance.


--ahsiii
 
Old 03-19-2008, 07:00 PM   #2
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Midwest USA, Central Illinois
Distribution: Slackware«
Posts: 11,270
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 1445Reputation: 1445Reputation: 1445Reputation: 1445Reputation: 1445Reputation: 1445Reputation: 1445Reputation: 1445Reputation: 1445Reputation: 1445
Hi,

You could always look at the 'HCL' that is at the top of the window.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-19-2008, 07:04 PM   #3
budword
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Distribution: Switched to regualr Ubuntu, because I don't like KDE4, at all. Looks like vista on crack.....
Posts: 675

Rep: Reputation: 31
Nvidia is the best supported, as long as you don't mind running proprietary drivers. There have been problems with the 8600 I think, so you might want to avoid that, at least until it gets sorted out.

David
 
Old 03-20-2008, 09:02 AM   #4
H_TeXMeX_H
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269
Certainly ATI is NOT the way to go. Anything but that. If you want to play the newest games, get an nvidia card, and for now, use the proprietary drivers. Maybe in a few good years, we will have FLOSS nvidia drivers that support 3D accel. I have an 8800 and it works just fine.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-24-2009, 05:35 PM   #5
celem
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Brevard, NC
Distribution: SUSE
Posts: 13

Rep: Reputation: 0
Thumbs down Problems with Nvidia

Quote:
Originally Posted by budword View Post
Nvidia is the best supported, ...
I had very bad luck with Nvidia and I am searching for something better. I built up a new PC specifically for a Linux system. Regrettably I selected a BioStar TF8200 A2+ e/w integrated Nvidia GeForce 8200 video. It gave me unholy grief. The latest drivers (January, 2009) worked some better but generally poor - it actually slowed down the system. The killer for me was jumpy, streaked video playback. I finally gave up and loaded Windows XP, whose drivers worked correctly and yielded a 1,000 times faster machine. Personally, I will avoid Nvidea but I am having trouble finding a suitable video cared, namely one that gets good Linux marks yet is still manufactured. If I can find good hardware I'll try again to build up a Linux only box.
 
Old 03-24-2009, 08:06 PM   #6
Electro
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,042

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by celem View Post
I had very bad luck with Nvidia and I am searching for something better. I built up a new PC specifically for a Linux system. Regrettably I selected a BioStar TF8200 A2+ e/w integrated Nvidia GeForce 8200 video. It gave me unholy grief. The latest drivers (January, 2009) worked some better but generally poor - it actually slowed down the system. The killer for me was jumpy, streaked video playback. I finally gave up and loaded Windows XP, whose drivers worked correctly and yielded a 1,000 times faster machine. Personally, I will avoid Nvidea but I am having trouble finding a suitable video cared, namely one that gets good Linux marks yet is still manufactured. If I can find good hardware I'll try again to build up a Linux only box.
Probably one of your problems is the pre-compiled distributions that can cause some performance penalty. Other problems is you care too much about eye candy effects. Using Compiz or Beryl on a daily basis to suit your eye candy obsession does penalizes your performance and stability. Your experience of Linux could limit how well your setup will perform in Linux. Like in any OS, you have to read what options are there and if they can increase performance. nVidia does have many options that improves performance. Also using distributions like Gentoo can help you to tweak performance of the whole setup further than just enabling nVidia options.

I have both nVidia and ATI cards that work. Both have different ways to set them up and have different ways to tweak their performance.

BTW, I suggest do not dig up old posts. Create a new post and link posts that resemble your own thread that you started.
 
Old 03-24-2009, 08:21 PM   #7
celem
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Brevard, NC
Distribution: SUSE
Posts: 13

Rep: Reputation: 0
No eye candy

I turn off all eye candy because it serves no useful purpose. I have no problem with Linux on other machines that I have, only with the NVidia driver on the Nvidia GeForce 8200, and this was several different distributions from Ubuntu to Sabayon. I have been using Linux since it was on a huge stack of floppies but never before experienced the problems that I described.

As far as old posts, I felt that my comment might benefit the original poster.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Electro View Post
Probably one of your problems is the pre-compiled distributions that can cause some performance penalty. Other problems is you care too much about eye candy effects. Using Compiz or Beryl on a daily basis to suit your eye candy obsession does penalizes your performance and stability. Your experience of Linux could limit how well your setup will perform in Linux. Like in any OS, you have to read what options are there and if they can increase performance. nVidia does have many options that improves performance. Also using distributions like Gentoo can help you to tweak performance of the whole setup further than just enabling nVidia options.

I have both nVidia and ATI cards that work. Both have different ways to set them up and have different ways to tweak their performance.

BTW, I suggest do not dig up old posts. Create a new post and link posts that resemble your own thread that you started.
 
Old 07-02-2010, 01:19 AM   #8
armandojnc
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Location: Puerto Pe˝asco
Distribution: Debian at office, Gentoo at Home
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question Still what is the best card for linux

Linux is the best OS but why keep making the user
Know and discover that (water boils) is beyond
My comprehension , beware of the very so called savvy
Some graphic chips ( specially SIS )
Are the worst for linux , the question is still unsolved however
WHO MAKES the best cards for Linux?
Does any one knows?
I dont think theres anybody here
 
Old 01-22-2012, 01:49 PM   #9
LinusStallman
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2010
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Linux Mint 17 MATE
Posts: 275

Rep: Reputation: 14
Question

As of 2012 - What is the best video card for GNU/Linux?

ATI, Nvidia or other?
 
Old 01-23-2012, 06:55 AM   #10
cascade9
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,718

Rep: Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904
ATI doesnt really exist anymore, its now all AMD GPUs/APUs.

There is no 'best video card for linux. Cards vary in performance, price, power use, heat ouput, etc.. nVidia and AMD/ATI are the only ones worth looking at for linux. Intel doesnt make video cards.

All of them have had problems with linux and video here and there- Intel, nVidia and ATI/AMD. The newer the GPU/APU/intel video adapter (I never call intel video chips 'GPUs' they dont diserve the name) the more likely you are to have problems in general.

AMD/ATI and intel tend to release the most documentation for the video chips/GPUs/APUs they make. AMD/ATI have developers working on the open soruce drivers as well. nVidia doesnt release anything apart from the closed drivers.....they have even discontinued the 'nv' open source (but obfuscated) drivers. They only release the closed source driver these days, and no documentation.

Last edited by cascade9; 01-23-2012 at 11:30 PM. Reason: typo
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-23-2012, 02:28 PM   #11
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Main: Gentoo Others: What fits the task
Posts: 15,592
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047
From my experience from the past 3-4 years in Linux: I neither had any problems with Nvidia or ATI/AMD, when using the proprietary drivers. You may have issues on newer cards when using the free drivers (regardless if AMD/ATI or Nvidia). I had some problems with an older Intel GPU (852/855GM), you may also have some issues with the newer (CPU-inbuilt) HD GPUs from Intel when not using the latest kernel/X/Mesa, but I can't really say that from my experience, don't have a newer Intel machine at this time.

My view on it: The whole "Nvidia is better for Linux than ATI/AMD" is a left over from past times, especially repeated over and over again from people that haven't tried anything else than Nvidia for years. I can say that I have just recently replaced my Nvidia card (GTX260) with an AMD card (HD6870), just because I knew that there won't be problems (and there ar no problems) and that I will get a decent performance for a good price. If there were similar performance for the same price from Nvidia I just had bought that, also not expecting any problems. AMD also works on the low-end for me, no issues with the integrated HD3200 in my laptop. I would expect the same for low-end Nvidia GPUs.

The only thing where you really might have problems with graphics in Linux is if you buy a laptop with NVidia Optimus technology, the "way better for Linux" company refuses at all to support it for the free OS.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-06-2012, 10:24 AM   #12
terminatorul
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2007
Posts: 18

Rep: Reputation: 0
I have a Sapphire ATI Radeon X1650 card at home, which is an old card now, and the free drivers under Slackware 13.37 32-bit have lower performance than the Windows ones. Which is what they actually state on the drivers page on the X Window System website. I can play World of Warcraft under Wine at somewhere under 10 FPS (I also have an old CPU, Celeron-D). I heard (but did not try) that the proprietary drivers for such old ATI cards no longer work with recent Linux distributions, and the AMD drivers website also sais they only support the old distributions (most likely since when the drivers where first released).

But they also say ATI made the chip specifications available, so the free drivers can be improved, which I think is important. Otherwise, the "better" proprietary drivers from nvidia for example might have the same fate as the properietary ati drivers: they will no longer work with some new rendering infrastructure from the next X version.

But to get an informed opinion, I think one should consult the website for the X Window System first, pick some well-enough supported chipset (if you can find one ), than pick a video card based on that chipset. You will need to do a little search for this, but you should get used to search the internet for what you need anyway. They have some nice user documentation pages for their drivers, so you don't need to worry about techical details there.
 
Old 06-06-2012, 10:41 AM   #13
amani
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: Kolkata, India
Distribution: 64-bit GNU/Linux, Kubuntu64, Fedora QA, Slackware,
Posts: 2,758

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
ATI radeon should be fine as it is also against anti-proprietary drivers.
But try to get completely open hardware. There are a few available.
 
  


Reply

Tags
graphics, video


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best video card for linux? drkstr Linux - Hardware 9 04-09-2006 07:35 PM
Most Linux friendly Video Card glen4cindy Linux - Hardware 11 02-10-2005 10:00 PM
Which video card is best for Linux? zmaint Linux - Hardware 7 03-01-2004 05:56 PM
What's the best video card for Linux right now? Thermodynamic Linux - Hardware 2 01-18-2004 02:10 PM
best video card for linux mode101 Linux - Hardware 5 07-26-2003 12:05 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration