![]() |
USB Removable Media copying VERY SLOW
Hi all, I am using Ubuntu on a Latitude notebook and just noticed that copying a 23mb zip archive to the USB removable media that detects and browses fine is very slow - ie under windows when I have copied this sort of size the copy finishes much faster.
Any ideas why this would be - is there a mode or option that sets the data transfer rate. I have downloaded some 20 images off a digital camera, zipped them up and copied them to the USB to send to another member of the organisation. In the past I would spend half my day in Windows doing Lotus Notes/MS-Office and Digital Camera stuff and now that I have Lotus running under WINE and OpenOffice is so good I am basically 99% free of Windows at work - this is great Anyway I just thought that someone might know why this transfer might be so slow... Will.* BTW it is a USB v1 usb hub - though I don't know all the stats on it - or the exact capacity of the stick. |
hello,
It sounds like the usb 1.0 hub is causing the problem. If you type lspci -v what do you get pertaining to the USB hub? Also do lsmod and see whether there is a module for ohci or ehci, or something like that - can't remember the exact name. Sounds like it's running at usb2 in wondoze and 1.1 in linux.......... |
Another cause could be supermount. I've seen much slower data rate with supermount enabled, than with manual mount/umount.
Yves. |
lspci -v yields:
Code:
0000:00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #1) (rev 02) (prog -if 00 [UHCI])usbcore 104292 3 uhci_hcd I do not know how to check for supermount. here is syslog Code:
Mar 1 08:11:16 localhost kernel: usbcore: registered new driver usb-storage*. |
Hmm,
I see what you are saying. It appears that the system things your USB hub is rather slower than it should really be.... I have a similar problem in that my front USB hub is running at 1.1 speed but it actually works at 2.0 speed in windoze.... here's my lspic -v: Code:
00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4) (progHowever,as I said the front one works as usb 2 in MS. I belive this if 20 [EHCI]) indicates that it's usb 2.0 Not sure which USB hub is which yet though. I am thinking to recompile my kernel with only support for ehci. I compiled it myself, so it's likely I made an error. Before I did that i remember it ran pretty fast. Did you compile yours? I found this: Code:
Supported by...Code:
ohci_hcd 18436 0It looks like you only have a 1.1 hub. So i guess you need UHCI support........ |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:23 AM. |