Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux? |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
05-08-2004, 03:35 AM
|
#1
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Distribution: Red Hat 9
Posts: 21
Rep:
|
trouble mounting drive, bad superblock error
Running RH9, kernel 2.4.20-31.9
trying to mount an 80G Maxtor drive. model 6Y080L0
In secondary slave position, jumpered slave.
I'm trying to make one 80G fat32 LBA partition accessible from both Linux and Win98.
I partitioned this drive as Fat32 (LBA) w/ fdisk in Linux, formatted it in windows. Windows can read it, but scandisk found bad sectors which it supposedly fixed. made a directory in Linux (/mnt/d) but when I try to mount I get the error:
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/hdd1,
or too many mounted file systems
(could this be the IDE device where you in fact use
ide-scsi so that sr0 or sda or so is needed?)
i ran fsck and got:
fsck 1.32 (09-Nov-2002)
e2fsck 1.32 (09-Nov-2002)
/dev/hdd: clean, 11/10010624 files, 314137/20010816 blocks
this would have found a bad superblock, correct?
I also tried deleting the partition and making and formatting a linux partition to see if it would mount that, but no luck there either. In fact, after formatting it in Linux and rebooting it doesn't recognize the partition table because fdisk -l shows this:
Disk /dev/hdd: 81.9 GB, 81964302336 bytes
16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 158816 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 1008 * 512 = 516096 bytes
Disk /dev/hdd doesn't contain a valid partition table <<<
My BIOS is set to autodetect and chooses LBA by default, but if I change settings from autodetect to 'user' and let it auto detect the type it chooses CHS. I have no idea if that has anything to do with anything though.
Win98 has no trouble reading or writing to this drive, I just can't get it to mount in Linux. Other LBA drives and windows partitions mount fine, and I'm not mounting them all at the same time, so it shouldn't be a "too many mounted filesystems" problem.
Help?
Last edited by mattuc; 05-08-2004 at 03:43 AM.
|
|
|
|
05-08-2004, 12:27 PM
|
#2
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Distribution: Red Hat 9
Posts: 21
Original Poster
Rep:
|
bump
bump
|
|
|
|
05-26-2004, 12:18 PM
|
#3
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: May 2004
Location: Pittsburgh
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 2
Rep:
|
I'm having the same troubles with my /dev/ataraid/d0p1
I moved the computer to a new case, added a video card and a hard disk and now it doesn't mount my RAID drive :-(
when I searched for this error on google, I got a lot of people asking about it and nobody answering, or saying "IM me and we'll work it out." So I think geting at least an explanation of the what the problem is online would be good.
In my case, the RAID drive is reiserfs formated, and it worked fine untill I moved everything. I was very carefull to preserve the cable oder (it's raid0, I don't want to screw that up!) and I've never had troubles with it before.
The server is Linux only, so I can't test it under windows.
|
|
|
|
05-27-2004, 10:05 AM
|
#4
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: May 2004
Location: Pittsburgh
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 2
Rep:
|
Well, in my case it was a hardware problem.
I hope you get yours fixed.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:38 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|