LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-08-2011, 07:39 PM   #1
hydraMax
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2010
Location: Skynet
Distribution: Debian + Emacs
Posts: 467
Blog Entries: 60

Rep: Reputation: 51
SSD


I've always been taught, and know from experience, that as far as performance goes (i.e., speed or raw read/write) RAM is always waaay faster than a mechanical hard-drive. But where do Solid-State Drives fit into this spectrum? Are they faster than mechanical hard-drives? Much faster? Are they as fast as RAM? Much slower?

I tried to research on my own some, but it is difficult to tell from the specs. (E.g., SSDs don't have RPM ratings.)
 
Old 01-08-2011, 09:05 PM   #2
MS3FGX
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: NJ, USA
Distribution: Slackware, Debian
Posts: 5,852

Rep: Reputation: 361Reputation: 361Reputation: 361Reputation: 361
Well, RPM wouldn't actually tell you how fast the drive is in the first place...you want to be looking at actual transfer rates, not what speed the drive spins at.

At any rate, SSDs are much faster with random read/write operations than mechanical hard drives, as there is virtually no seek time. Transfer rates on SSDs are not necessarily higher than HDD (depends on the price point and quality of the SSD), but that really only matters when doing operations on large files. For operating system use, zero seek time is going to give you a much larger practical benefit than higher transfer rates would.

But RAM is many many times faster than either SSD or HDD. There isn't even a comparison with current drive technology.
 
Old 01-09-2011, 08:09 AM   #3
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida 20 minutes from Disney World
Distribution: Slackware®
Posts: 13,922
Blog Entries: 44

Rep: Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158
Hi,

Intel SSD will provide some useful information for users;
Quote:
Intel® High Performance SATA Solid-State Drives (SSDs) are designed to deliver outstanding performance and reliability. With no moving parts, Intel SSDs offer a quiet storage solution that responds quickly and uses less power. Compared to traditional hard disk drives, Intel SSDs are significantly more responsive, much more reliable, have lower power consumption and are completely quiet.
Intel SSDs are designed and validated specifically for PC applications using Intel's deep knowledge and understanding of PC design. Details include:
  • Use of high performance Open NAND Flash Interface (ONFI) working group spec flash chips
  • Parallel 10 channel architecture for high sustained read/write bandwidth
  • Extremely high random access speeds (I/O operations per second or IOPs) that are tuned for typical PC applications and modern operating systems
Typical user information & sales support information. Look at the technical specs & additional information on the Intel site.

RAMdisk do provide a means to have very fast storage or intermediate storage for web page presentations, data encryption or temp storage that will be dropped whenever power state is changed or reboots.

RAMdisk boards are not CHEAP! But very efficient when setup properly. The RAMdisk wiki will help define. Several advantages of using a RAMdisk, Instrumentation for data collection for high data rates or Medical Instrumentation for data analysis. Data storage latency for a RAMdisk will be dependent on the control circuits for the RAM. Most RAMdisk will have a battery or other means to keep the data valid when power is lost to the system.

If you do not wish to purchase a RAMdisk then you could look at Linux Ramdisk mini-HOWTO.
Dated but applicable, you will need to tweak things a bit but you can experiment to see the advantages.

The mix of storage systems can be an advantage when utilized by a knowledgeable user.
 
Old 01-09-2011, 09:18 AM   #4
salasi
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2007
Location: Directly above centre of the earth, UK
Distribution: SuSE, plus some hopping
Posts: 4,070

Rep: Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897Reputation: 897
Quote:
Originally Posted by hydraMax View Post
I But where do Solid-State Drives fit into this spectrum? Are they faster than mechanical hard-drives? Much faster? Are they as fast as RAM? Much slower?
Yes, yes (depending), no, quite a bit.

Note that even if you did have a simple figure that you could compare (rpm, seek time, peak bandwidth, sustained bandwidth or whatever else you could come up with) it wouldn't be a good comparison. SSDs are really quite fast in read, but not so fast in write, something that hard disks don't share, so whatever comparison you come up with would be quite heavily dependant on the exact data pattern. And hard disks are really quite slow in seek/latency, something that SSDs don't share, so again the exact results are going to depend heavily on the data patterns.
 
Old 01-09-2011, 12:09 PM   #5
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Central Florida 20 minutes from Disney World
Distribution: Slackware®
Posts: 13,922
Blog Entries: 44

Rep: Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158Reputation: 3158
Hi,

Actually head R/W actuator latency along with spindle rotation speed does play a roll when checking the drive performance. As the platter density increases then this factor does change to the advantage of accessing the data on the platter faster. One of the reasons to get a HDD with a larger cache.

Block data can be stored on a HDD then shared via the cache or RAMdisk for presentation.That's one of the advantages to use a SSD or invest in a separate RAMdisk to allow faster access to data R/W for a HDD.

Personally, I use SSD & SATA HDD that does mean a little more thought when partitioning on either.

The biggest advantage for SSD & RAMdisk are the lack of mechanical parts for access and the power usage thus longer battery life for mobile. Less power means less heat thus the use on desktops/laptops is a real plus for heat flow within the boxen. Look at the above links to enlighten about specs for SSD. Throw in access then you have a bigger plus. For HDD use Google to find loads of data or specs.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] TRIM on SSD mira.mikes Linux - Kernel 8 01-08-2011 06:36 PM
SSD drives McDivot Linux - Newbie 2 09-28-2010 05:00 PM
ssd slack66 Slackware 5 06-24-2010 12:56 AM
Firmware is not ssd? cccc Linux - General 3 12-31-2009 10:12 AM
SSD not recognized toneman77 Linux - Hardware 26 10-17-2009 02:45 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:09 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration