Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?


  Search this Thread
Old 02-26-2006, 12:06 AM   #1
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: California
Distribution: Slackware rules!
Posts: 31

Rep: Reputation: 15
Software Raid with IDE: Should I be worried about failed drives?


I built a new computer with 3 120GB Hard drives(I got them clearance at $30 each). I wanted to combine them together using RAID linear as described in numerous tutorials on the internet. But all these tutorials seem to be worried about failing drives and so I wanted to ask you if I should really be worried about failed drives? Are these tutorials aimed at high-load webservers which are prone to drive errors? I have used hard drives for 9 years without them giving me a single problem.

This computer will be used for a small webserver which may become a big webserver( in that case, I will get bigger hard drives and use RAID-3 to add parity information).

Old 02-26-2006, 01:27 AM   #2
LQ Guru
Registered: Aug 2001
Location: Fargo, ND
Distribution: SuSE AMD64
Posts: 15,733

Rep: Reputation: 670Reputation: 670Reputation: 670Reputation: 670Reputation: 670Reputation: 670
Raid 3 isn't used. I wouldn't recommend linear or raid-0 as they offer no redundancy. If your first drive goes bad, then you lost the entire array. The drive doesn't have to have a hardware failure. A bad block, a power spike, or going down uncleanly could mark the drive as bad.

If these are scsi drives, I would recommend raid-5.
For a web server, you may want to mirror the first 2 drives, and use the 3rd as a spare. Then one of the first two goes bad, the spare will replace the unit. You then have time to replace it.

Raid 0 (striping) will give you a larger array, and better performance. For better results on ide drives, don't use the slave connector. Ide controllers are cheap, so just add one if you need to.

If you had 4 drives you could use both striping and mirroring. The latest mdadm supports this. Some people have had problems setting up a raid 1+0 array and booting from it, and upgrading mdadm fixed it.
Old 02-26-2006, 10:59 AM   #3
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: California
Distribution: Slackware rules!
Posts: 31

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
i am going to be doing regular backups though so I don't really need redundancy. And about drives goind bad: So if I turn off the computer without using shutdown the drive will be marked as bad? I am really not using software RAID for the redundancy but rather to just combine three disks into one? And won't a surge protector protect against power spikes? Also, don't you need same size partitions for RAID-0?


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
3TB IDE Software Raid-5 Server!!! sanwizard Linux - General 1 11-21-2004 11:31 PM
IDE Software RAID 0 - overruns error nnsg Linux - General 0 11-09-2004 09:16 AM
Software RAID: 4 drives at once? GaX Linux - Hardware 2 01-08-2004 10:21 AM
Upgrading hard drives on Software raid 1 boot drives. linuxboy123 Linux - General 0 12-11-2003 03:28 PM
moving system from ide software raid to new box with scsi raid ftumsh Linux - General 0 10-28-2003 09:34 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:44 PM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration