LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 07-11-2006, 07:42 PM   #1
sillygates
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2006
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question Should I use JBOD or LVM? (spanning disks)


Hi, I have a Tyan s2865 motherboard which supports hardware JBOD (spanning).

I was trying to decide whether I want to use LVM or JBOD for my 2x 500GB and 1x400GB drives, and came up with a few concerns about both.


My main concern with using the hardware JBOD was the master file table. I am concerned that if I put an ext3 partition on spanned disks the MFT may only exist on one, or expand to others without the files listed in it virtually making the system dependant on the drive with the MFT entry and in the case where the drive may fail I might lose all my files. The secondary concern I had with JBOD is I dont know that I would be able to get the drives to powerdown after inactivity.


LVM on the other hand may or may not have performance issues compared to the JBOD volume, and I fear I would not be able to access the data on these drives within windows.

If anyone with greater knowledge of how the MFT, and hdparm suspend works on a JBOD system, or can address any of my other concerns I would be glad to hear a reply.
 
Old 07-15-2006, 10:42 AM   #2
MensaWater
Guru
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Atlanta Georgia USA
Distribution: Redhat (RHEL), CentOS, Fedora, Debian, FreeBSD, HP-UX, Solaris, SCO
Posts: 6,009
Blog Entries: 5

Rep: Reputation: 787Reputation: 787Reputation: 787Reputation: 787Reputation: 787Reputation: 787Reputation: 787
I don't know MFT but remember there is a limit to the number of partitions you can put on a drive. Presumably a spanned JBOD would appear to the OS as a single drive so you'd have a limited number of partitions for filesystems. LVM by comparison would allow you to make as many logical volumes (think of them as virtual partitions) as you'd like.

On the flip side as you mentionn LVM being software based may give slightly less performance than a hardware spanned device. Truthfully though I've used LVM for years (first on HP-UX then on Linux) and really never saw any major performance impact.

The problem with losing a single disk would be the same with either option.

It would be nice if your MFT allowed for RAID so you can have mirroring or RAID 5 because this would specifically prevent loss of a single drive from affecting you.

An option you didn't mention is software RAID. Have a look at the man page for mdadm (man mdadm). This is good on Linux as it allows you define partitions of different disks as RAID members rather than requiring the entire disks. You could therefore make your boot/root mirrored and risk the rest of your filesystems without RAID protection. In the event of a disk failure you'd lose data (assuming you weren't backing it up on a regular basis as you should) but would still be able to boot up from the remaining drive.
 
Old 07-20-2006, 08:07 PM   #3
sillygates
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2006
Posts: 2

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Well, even though I'm slightly paranoid about data loss, I am a college student on a slight budget, and my data files are not mission critical, so mirroring (or buying a raid 5 controller and using partity) is out of the question. (though it would have been nice if the MFT alone could be duplicated efficiently)

I went ahead and used LVM at the cost of a performance hit and lack of windows support, I did this so that I can utilize power management on the drives safely. I am also using a different, single drive, for the OS and other slightly more important files.

Thanks for the input.

Last edited by sillygates; 07-20-2006 at 08:10 PM.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
raid/jbod question Voltar Slackware 3 07-09-2006 04:01 AM
Backup problem when spanning multiple removable disks wayne.liu Linux - General 3 07-03-2006 03:44 PM
RHEL 3: Steps of expanding file system (add new SCSI disks) to existing SW RAID & LVM atman1974 Linux - General 2 01-12-2006 09:49 PM
JBOD support with HP NetRAID-4M? FinalFantasy Linux - Hardware 0 10-15-2005 07:30 PM
Manage disks on an existing system with LVM doris Linux - Hardware 1 03-02-2005 02:37 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:57 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration