LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 04-23-2013, 10:59 AM   #1
sir-lancealot
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Posts: 336

Rep: Reputation: 31
Replacing old SAN - is this the better solution?


I have an old SAN connected via Fibre to 1 server, which then exports that SAN via NFS. I had a drive failure (raid5) and a replacement is over $600, and since it's so old we wish to replace it and free up some space (currently the SAN, plus the old server, the ups for that and the 2ndary controller is around 8U in our rack).

I am looking at maybe something like a buffalo iSCSI 1U rack that has failover to a second server server (we would purchase 2) but wondering on performance.

I thought server1 would export some things, server2 would export other things, and behind the scenes, they would replicate and failover to the other in case of hardware failure, but not sure if that will give me the same performance, better, or even where to start. (Do I make seperate LVM volumes, export them vs 1 large partition), etc.

Really new stuff for me on this one, so looking for things to look at, avoid, etc.

Thanks.
 
Old 04-25-2013, 12:03 PM   #2
smallpond
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Distribution: CentOS 6 (pre-systemd)
Posts: 1,773

Rep: Reputation: 454Reputation: 454Reputation: 454Reputation: 454Reputation: 454
A Honda is not a Rolls Royce, but a lot of people still buy them.

An enterprise RAID system has hot-swappable parts, mirrored non-volatile write cache, dual RAID controllers, and enterprise disks.

A low-end RBOD has a single RAID controller, "good quality" SATA drives, and you provide a UPS and hope for the best.

Your plan of active-active operation and simultaneous replication and failover, even of different LUNs, sounds complex to me. Is this mode supported by the storage? How will you test it? If you do this, do not try to combine them. Export as separate volumes. Personally I would be cautious and do active-standby unless I had experience with these systems.

Performance will mostly be dictated by the number of drives and how well your access is spread across them. A smaller number of larger drives will give worse performance than your old system with more smaller drives.

Realtime replication will slow write performance quite a bit. They can cheat and do write-behind, which means you lose some data on a failover. Read the specs carefully, this may be configurable. Also, if the replication link goes down, how does it tell you? Nobody ever checks the pressure on their spare tire until they need it.
 
Old 04-25-2013, 01:54 PM   #3
whizje
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2008
Location: The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware64 current
Posts: 583

Rep: Reputation: 129Reputation: 129
Search for linux mirror cluster failover and be ready for a lot of reading.
Architecting Linux High-Availability Clusters

Last edited by whizje; 04-25-2013 at 02:05 PM.
 
Old 04-25-2013, 04:28 PM   #4
sir-lancealot
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2007
Posts: 336

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 31
Thanks for the replies, and smallpond, your analogies are simply priceless!

The storage device handles a lot of the test/failover and notices, but from my endless readings, they do tend to be a bit slow since they only ship with 5400 RPM drives and you cant buy the device diskless. My other thought as you said was to get a 1U with 6 2.5 bay's and go with an open source package like openfiler (http://www.openfiler.com/) but I have never used it so it's a bit of an investment to test, so I may do an in-house test first.

@whizje- thanks, going to get a large cup of coffee and start reading!

I don't want to save a dollar and re-pay for years stuck with expensive hard drives, etc. which is why I want to go with normal drives, or maybe a 1U with 4 15K disks to get even faster performance while keeping the 1U footprint!

Thanks again guys
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Emluex SAN not visible in RHEL 5.6. SAN array is HP XP12000 austinbravo Linux - Newbie 0 07-26-2011 09:38 PM
Looking for Open Source SAN or LUN Backup Solution DukeLeto Linux - Software 4 04-22-2011 02:05 PM
SAN Storage Disks Replacing furqan_sindhu Other *NIX 0 03-24-2011 03:48 PM
replacing aging checkpoint server with an open source solution netlogic Linux - Server 2 06-15-2007 12:44 PM
Looking for a backup solution (tape/nas/san...) yanik Linux - Enterprise 2 09-07-2006 03:41 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:46 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration