Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux? |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
01-07-2004, 10:19 PM
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,218
Rep:
|
Question on CPU speed vs RAM
Hi folks,
I have a question on speed of CPU vs RAM size
I am going to build a workstation running Gentoo 14 or its later version. My major target on the new WS is it won't take too long time to compile, install, etc. source packages downloaded from Gentoo website. I am sitting on 3MB broadband. My former planning is to have AMD 2.5/2.6G CUP and 1G DDR400 RAM. Can I achieve a better performance by reducing the RAM size to 512MB DDR333 and with the cost thus saved to upgrade AMD CUP to 2.6G+?
Kindly advise.
TIA
B.R.
satimis
|
|
|
|
01-07-2004, 10:28 PM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: raleigh
Distribution: Gentoo 2005.1 x86_64
Posts: 931
Rep:
|
keep the ddr400, you wont see much different in speed with the faster CPU. if im not mistaken the memory bus and the system bus run seperatley now so even if the bus on your CPU is less that 400 yoru memory still runs at 400.
|
|
|
|
01-07-2004, 11:14 PM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,218
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by doralsoral
keep the ddr400, you wont see much different in speed with the faster CPU. if im not mistaken the memory bus and the system bus run seperatley now so even if the bus on your CPU is less that 400 yoru memory still runs at 400.
|
Hi,
Thanks for your advice.
Can you please explain in more detail on
"memory bus and the system bus run seperatley now so even if the bus on your CPU is less that 400 yoru memory still runs at 400"
TIA
B.R.
satimis
|
|
|
|
01-07-2004, 11:16 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Oregon, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,246
Rep:
|
I don't believe you can increase your memory bus speed to more than 200% your FSB speed (the default). At least my BIOS won't let me. The DDR400 would definitely be nice though if your CPU is designed for a 200MHz FSB (which requires DDR400) or if you plan on overclocking.
|
|
|
|
01-07-2004, 11:24 PM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Oregon, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,246
Rep:
|
The system and memory bus speeds are still the same. DDR RAM just uses both the the rising and falling edge of the wave which effectively Doubles the Data Rate (DDR). So DDR400 still works at 200MHz but they cram twice as much data in there as older technologies.
A lot of BIOSes at least let you set your memory speed to something lower than your FSB, but I'm not sure about higher. Mine lets me choose in increments of 10% up to 200% of my FSB speed.
|
|
|
|
01-07-2004, 11:32 PM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Oregon, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,246
Rep:
|
BTW, here's a pretty good webpage with a definition for you. It also has a link to a webpage that talks about system performance: http://www.ddrmemoryram.com/
|
|
|
|
01-08-2004, 01:28 AM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,218
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally posted by itsme86
BTW, here's a pretty good webpage with a definition for you. It also has a link to a webpage that talks about system performance: http://www.ddrmemoryram.com/
|
Hi,
It is an interesting link. Thanks.
Additional question, have you tried AMD CPU delivered on bulb (tray) package before? I have been using AMD CPU for several years without problem but only box package. The physical difference which I can recognize between them is one with box and heat sink+cooling fan another without. What are the differnece between quality and warrantee.
B.R.
satimis
|
|
|
|
01-08-2004, 01:53 AM
|
#8
|
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 6,642
Rep:
|
My suggestion: Both the mobo and the CPU will have a rating for the FSB. You want those to match. Similarly, the FSB will determine what kind of RAM you should get. The point is that you want everything to operate at the same speed.
One example: Take a AMD Athlon "Barton" 2500+ chip. It's got an FSB of 333Mz, and runs fast. You might want to pair this with an Asus A7N8X mobo, which supports the 333 FSB. If you go with both of these choices, then a good RAM choice would be Kingston DDR333 (PC2700) RAM, again because the speed matches. Where you run into trouble is with systems where one component operates faster/slower than the others. -- J.W.
|
|
|
|
01-08-2004, 02:05 PM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Knoxville, TN
Distribution: Kubuntu 9.04
Posts: 1,168
Rep:
|
Quote:
Additional question, have you tried AMD CPU delivered on bulb (tray) package before? I have been using AMD CPU for several years without problem but only box package. The physical difference which I can recognize between them is one with box and heat sink+cooling fan another without. What are the differnece between quality and warrantee.
[/B]
|
If you're building an SMP machine (multiple CPUs) buying them out of the same tray/lot ensures stepping numbers will be identical; which can sometimes be the cause of intermittent and seemingly mysterious problems. For a single CPU machine you get a better warranty with the boxed processors. You also get a quality fan. Nothing more annoying than a computer that sounds like a jet airplane taking off.  The price difference isn't enough to justify the hassle IMHO. Unless you're planning on overclocking it, I suppose. In which case you can spend more on cooling than the CPU. Was just looking at a case with built-in radiator for water cooling... some people really like to go nuts with their PCs  Check it out: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=3451494221
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|