LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 03-19-2004, 04:55 AM   #1
san_lss
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Posts: 7

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question Processor for a server with Red Hat Linux 9 - single or dual?


I need to setup a server. The platform is planned to be Red Hat Linux 9.
A lot of computer simulation works will be done on the server.

I'm now choosing the processor for the server.
Should it be:

[A] 2 x Intel Xeon 2.8/512 - dual processors
[B] 1 x Intel Xeon 2.8/512 + 1 x Intel Xeon 2.4/512 - dual processors
[C] 1 x Intel Xeon 3.06/512 - single processor
[D] 1 x Intel Pentium4 3.X - single processor

Which is the fastest and which is the slowest?
Hope to get the idea of how the speed/performance be arranged accordingly from the fastest to the slowest.

By the way, what will be the other suggestions besides the list above?
Can Red Hat Linux 9 supports those processors?

Please comment.

Thank You!

P/S: One of my major target product is DELL PowerEdge 1600SC server.
http://www1.ap.dell.com/content/prod..._my&l=en&s=bsd
 
Old 03-19-2004, 06:33 AM   #2
arrruken
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Distribution: gentoo
Posts: 238

Rep: Reputation: 30
The Pentium 4 will be the fastest for the majority of normal taks, because it has the highest FSB. The Dual setups would be faster during computionally intesive processes, like 3d animation or looking through heavy databases, though faster hard drives would be better for a database server. So as far as performance, it depends what youre doing, but my list would go: A,B, D, & C, from fastest to slowest.
If I were you though, and you wanted the cutting edge, Id get a dual opteron system, and put the 64-bit version of Gentoo or Suse on there. Dell doesnt sell them yet, but HP and Sun do. And as far as ease of use compared to RH, Suse is just as easy, although Gentoo would probably be faster.
For a good review of both processors, check out this site's review:

And also, if you must have a Xeon, Id wait a few months till they go to the 90 nm process and have 64-bit support as well.

Last edited by arrruken; 03-19-2004 at 06:36 AM.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dual processor vs. Dual core cs. single on home machine fincher69 Linux - Hardware 3 03-04-2005 12:37 PM
Installation problem of Red Hat Linux 9 with Cyrix III processor Maulik Shah Red Hat 2 12-13-2004 06:52 PM
Dual Boot - Win2k Server NTFS and Red Hat 9.0 llace Linux - Newbie 0 06-28-2004 02:25 PM
How can I remove root logons using Linux Single and Linux Rescue from Red Hat startup LHRM Linux - Security 9 04-09-2004 07:07 PM
xinetd 100% utilization on one processor on a two processor system red hat 9 garnold Linux - General 0 02-02-2004 01:47 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:27 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration