Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I've used optical mice and I've used ball mice, but now I ran into something called optomechanical mice which seems to be a cross between the two...but I haven't found much information about them.
Has anyone used these? Do they have the same problems that ordinary ball mice have? Do they get gummed up with lint, then slowly stops being an effective pointing tool? Do they require a mouse pad?
I have an optomechanical trackball mouse. It's pretty good, but you'll need to occasionally remove the ball and wipe out the lint from the optical sensors. Here's mine: http://www.practicalpc.co.uk/reviews...k_explorer.htm. It uses a USB port, but it comes with a USB-to-PS/2 adapter. Linux treats it like a normal mouse.
As far as I know, all ball mice are opto-mechanical. The "mechanical" part comes from the fact that mechanical rollers are used to translate the ball's 2 dimensional motion into 1 dimensional motion of two discs. Each disc has a bunch of radial spokes. The "optical" part comes from the fact that optical sensors are used to detect motion of the radial spokes.
From the first Macintosh mouse onward, ball mice have used the same basic mechanism.
As far as I know, all ball mice are opto-mechanical. The "mechanical" part comes from the fact that mechanical rollers are used to translate the ball's 2 dimensional motion into 1 dimensional motion of two discs. Each disc has a bunch of radial spokes. The "optical" part comes from the fact that optical sensors are used to detect motion of the radial spokes.
From the first Macintosh mouse onward, ball mice have used the same basic mechanism.
Well, Wikipedia seperates mice into categories: Mechanical mice, Optical Mice (which includes Opto-mechanical as a type of optical mouse), Laser Mice, and some rarer types. Perhaps "regular" mechanical mice are rare and what I believed where mechanical ball mice were actually opto-mechanical mice?
I think the quote which is confusing you is this one:
"Optomechanical mice detect movements of the ball optically, giving the precision of optical without the surface compatibility problems, whereas optical mice detect movement relative to the surface by examining the light reflected off it."
Here's a video of my Honeywell optomechanical mouse. It's a demo model with transparent shell so you can see the optical part. Wikipedia's definition is the exact one Honeywell's engineers used. http://4crito.com/video/optomechanical.mov
Thanks for clarifying...guess I will avoid buying optomechanical, seems lots of eBay listings try to use this as excuse to call a ball mouse optical, but then again, the sellers could be confused themselves by the term.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.