Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Dude, if you saying that debain only uses old versions, then your sorely mistaken. If you run the stable version you get only the most stable versions. But i've personally being using unstable(which is stabler then redhat ever was). I've got Gimp 1.3, Xfree 4.3 and alot of "modern" versions.
Just go to your /etc/apt/sources.list and change all the "stable" to "unstable"
type "dist upgrade;apt-get update;apt-get upgrade"
Okey dude. Ment no offence. I just got the impression that the guy's at debian are kind of paraniod when it come to stability. I know there is an "unstable" branche with more up-to-date versions btw. But I can imagin a newbie thinking "he I want to stable one cos the unstable on aint stable"
No hard feelings right?
ps. I don't think debain is a bad distro or any thing like that. I rather have debain then most other distro's
Just installed an copy of slackware 9. Although as you can see from my profile, I have tried out a good number of distro's, including debian. One of the beter distro's I tried. But the best distro in my mind is linux from scratch. It's a real pain getting it installed, but it's well worth it. I would be using it right now if it wern't for an hard drive crash I had a week of two ago.
It must have been since I was starting X on a ssh connection. As soon as I got home after upgrading nvidia-glx to unstable, things worked fine. I've since upgraded KDE from 2.2 to 3.1, with associated x dependancies, and things are working fine. Haven't tested 3D accel yet, but nothing in the XFree86.log leads me to believe it's broken.
Now it's just performance tweaking. Actually, if any of you have links to a decent guide or HOWTO on performance options for a Geforce4400Ti, it'd save me soem googling.
Anyone solve a problem with glx not loading on redhat 9.0 and nvidia 5336? here is the error in my XFree86.0.log. Any ideas on how to fix this?
Quote:
(II) LoadModule: "glx"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.so
dlopen: /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.so: symbol _nv000344gl, version LIBGLCORE not defined in file libGLcore.so.1 with link time reference
(EE) Failed to load /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libglx.so
(II) UnloadModule: "glx"
(EE) Failed to load module "glx" (loader failed, 7)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.