LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-20-2007, 06:51 PM   #1
davidguygc
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Distribution: Slackware 12.0 with Beryl 0.2.1
Posts: 334

Rep: Reputation: 30
My box should be 64 bit...


Hi, I am trying to make sure that my computer is running in 64-bit, and when I tried to update an Nvidia Driver, it said:
Code:
ERROR: this .run file is intended for the
Linux-ia64 platform, but you appear to be
running on Linux-x86.  Aborting installation.
I set the kernel as best as I could to run 64-bit, but I am still getting this error. What should I do? My computer specs are in my signature.
 
Old 05-20-2007, 06:54 PM   #2
vtel57
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: USA
Distribution: Slackware64 - 14.2 w/ Xfce
Posts: 1,631

Rep: Reputation: 489Reputation: 489Reputation: 489Reputation: 489Reputation: 489
Did you install a 64 bit Linux distribution (x86_64.iso)?
 
Old 05-20-2007, 07:30 PM   #3
davidguygc
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Distribution: Slackware 12.0 with Beryl 0.2.1
Posts: 334

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
I have no idea, I am using Slackware 11 -current
 
Old 05-20-2007, 10:14 PM   #4
jay73
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2006
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.04, Debian testing
Posts: 5,019

Rep: Reputation: 133Reputation: 133
There isn't any 64 bit Slackware afaik; there is only an unofficial 64 bit port (Slamd64). 32 or 64 bit shouldn't make much of a difference because the performance is similar; some applications are somewhat faster on 64 bit but most are actually slower. I'm sure some are going to jump in and question this but I have the benchmarks to show that they would be wrong.

Last edited by jay73; 05-20-2007 at 10:23 PM.
 
Old 05-20-2007, 10:31 PM   #5
vtel57
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: USA
Distribution: Slackware64 - 14.2 w/ Xfce
Posts: 1,631

Rep: Reputation: 489Reputation: 489Reputation: 489Reputation: 489Reputation: 489
Jay is correct. Slack is currently only available as a 32 bit operating system. It runs fine on 64 bit machines, though. That's what I'm using right now, as a matter of fact. Currently, there are very few advantages and quite a few disadvantages to running 64 bit. There are very few true 64 bit apps. No browser plugins will work with 64 bit browsers. Etc. Stick with 32 bit for now. That's my opinion.

Luck!
 
Old 05-20-2007, 10:38 PM   #6
HappyTux
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
Distribution: Debian AMD64
Posts: 4,170

Rep: Reputation: 244Reputation: 244Reputation: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by davidguygc
I have no idea, I am using Slackware 11 -current
What does this show you?

Code:
>$ uname -m
x86_64
But I believe you have a different problem as well the ia64 that is mentioned in your first post is for the Itanium family of chips not the Core Duo versions, if you are running 64bit then you want the amd64/em64t variety of the driver.
 
Old 05-20-2007, 11:06 PM   #7
slackhack
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Distribution: Arch, Debian, Slack
Posts: 1,016

Rep: Reputation: 47
arch 64 is a true 64-bit distro. if you want 64-bit, imho you should try that. it's very fast and not noticeably slower at all than 32-bit on the same hardware. if anything, it's definitely faster. flash 9 browser plugin works with nspluginwrappers, it took about 5 minutes to install everything for that using very simple instructions in the wiki. i think at least fedora and debian have 64-bit versions, maybe also gentoo and probably others (suse), but i'm not sure all of those are native 64-bit or have some 32-bit libraries, etc. gl
 
Old 05-21-2007, 01:37 AM   #8
davidguygc
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Distribution: Slackware 12.0 with Beryl 0.2.1
Posts: 334

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
Ok, thanks for all the input, I understand it all better now
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
32-bit compatibility on a 64-bit AMD box ?? Rod Butcher Linux - General 4 01-11-2007 05:10 PM
system very slow in Intel 64 bit box. bruse Debian 4 05-02-2006 10:06 AM
Can a 32 bit os run on a 64 bit box? sirius57 Linux - Hardware 6 03-20-2006 10:11 PM
gdb won't recognize 64 bit executable on my RedHat 64 bits box cerniagigante Programming 1 02-23-2006 01:36 AM
FS: Sun Java Station W1100Z 64 bit Opteron, 80gb, 512MB BOX Randy Miyazaki Solaris / OpenSolaris 0 11-14-2005 05:33 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:15 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration