Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
There isn't any 64 bit Slackware afaik; there is only an unofficial 64 bit port (Slamd64). 32 or 64 bit shouldn't make much of a difference because the performance is similar; some applications are somewhat faster on 64 bit but most are actually slower. I'm sure some are going to jump in and question this but I have the benchmarks to show that they would be wrong.
Jay is correct. Slack is currently only available as a 32 bit operating system. It runs fine on 64 bit machines, though. That's what I'm using right now, as a matter of fact. Currently, there are very few advantages and quite a few disadvantages to running 64 bit. There are very few true 64 bit apps. No browser plugins will work with 64 bit browsers. Etc. Stick with 32 bit for now. That's my opinion.
But I believe you have a different problem as well the ia64 that is mentioned in your first post is for the Itanium family of chips not the Core Duo versions, if you are running 64bit then you want the amd64/em64t variety of the driver.
arch 64 is a true 64-bit distro. if you want 64-bit, imho you should try that. it's very fast and not noticeably slower at all than 32-bit on the same hardware. if anything, it's definitely faster. flash 9 browser plugin works with nspluginwrappers, it took about 5 minutes to install everything for that using very simple instructions in the wiki. i think at least fedora and debian have 64-bit versions, maybe also gentoo and probably others (suse), but i'm not sure all of those are native 64-bit or have some 32-bit libraries, etc. gl
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.