Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
and now I'm getting this (when I try to mount it):
Mar 30 18:09:10 oxygen kernel: usb 5-2: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 3
Mar 30 18:09:10 oxygen kernel: scsi15 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices
Mar 30 18:09:15 oxygen kernel: Vendor: .l.l.l.l Model: .l.l.l.l.l.l.l.l Rev: 0811
Mar 30 18:09:15 oxygen kernel: Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 00
Mar 30 18:09:15 oxygen kernel: SCSI device sda: 778841708 512-byte hdwr sectors (398767 MB)
Mar 30 18:09:15 oxygen kernel: sda: assuming drive cache: write through
Mar 30 18:09:15 oxygen kernel: SCSI device sda: 778841708 512-byte hdwr sectors (398767 MB)
Mar 30 18:09:15 oxygen kernel: sda: assuming drive cache: write through
Mar 30 18:09:15 oxygen kernel: sda: unknown partition table
Mar 30 18:09:15 oxygen kernel: Attached scsi disk sda at scsi15, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
Mar 30 18:09:15 oxygen scsi.agent[24369]: disk at /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.3/usb5/5-2/5-2:1.0/host15/target15:0:0/15:0:0:0
Mar 30 18:09:31 oxygen kernel: FAT: invalid media value (0xc2)
Mar 30 18:09:31 oxygen kernel: VFS: Can't find a valid FAT filesystem on dev sda.
Mar 30 18:10:58 oxygen kernel: VFS: Can't find an ext2 filesystem on dev sda.
Mar 30 18:11:04 oxygen kernel: VFS: Can't find ext3 filesystem on dev sda.
@ coontie: I don't know why you did rmmod ehci_hcd, to me it looked like your drive was being spotted so you should be able to 'mount -t auto /dev/sda /mnt/whatever' (make sure /mnt/whatever exists before you try)
@J_K9: The drive will not (I think) be mounted until you explicitly issue the command to do it, but maybe Fedora has some auto mounting thingy so ymmv.
I was hoping 'tail' would produce a line like this from coontie's post:
once I saw a line like that on my machine I knew that the drive was at 'sda' and then I could mount it.
Sorry I can't help more, I am fishing in the dark here. I don't understand all the SCSI stuff, I don't think I have got messages like those from messing with USB stuff but I could be (probaly) wrong.
Thanks for all your help chefmark, but is there nothing else I can do? Can't I try the rmmod thing (even though I'm not sure what it does) and see if it works then? I really need to get this working. Oh, and a bit of a sidetracked question: does Ubuntu use .rpms?
i did rmmod ehci because I found a site where this dude is saying that it helped him resolve frequent usb time-out errors while copying large files between fedora and HD.
in fact, as soon as i rmmod'ed the stupid thing, my OTHER (non-maxtor) drive started working fine. Moreover, fedora created a mount point /media/backup, pointing to the /dev/sda1 in /etc/fstab. All i had to do then was mount /media/backup and i could read the drive's files no problem.
This maxtor drive, however, is still a mystery. But I tell ya, nothing happened at all, until i removed that module. I've no idea what it does but in /etc/modules.conf it points to usb something or rather..
Mounting USB devices is working fine for me in FC3. I'm the service manager of a computer store and my main data recovery PC is an FC3 box. I have a USB device that let's me attach any IDE drive I want. The only trouble I have is when the drive I'm trying to mount has an odball partitioning program on it. Like EZ-drive or other drive overlay.
Check your hardware browser to see where the system is putting the drive. Just go to Menu>System Tools>Hardware Browser. When you mount a USB device (or almost any device for that matter) you'll find it in /Media. Hope this helps.
leonardh: I tried the hardware browser, but it just said that "it might take a long time", so I left it for 2 hours and it still didn't move from that screen! I eventually just cancelled because I don't think it was ever going to finish! Thanks for everyone's help, but are there any more final ideas floating around there?
Try logging into KDE and run the Hardware Browser from there (make sure the drive is plugged in of course ). It really should tell you what device it's installing the drive on.
Okay, I used Hardware Browser (after booting the system with the external hard drive plugged in) and I clicked on "USB devices".
Under "Selected Device", it said: "VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 Controller
Then beneath that, under "Device Information" there were two more things:
"Manufacturer - Unknown"
"Driver - uhci-hcd"
I'm not really sure what to do now. I have sent a mod an email (can't PM because I don't suscribe) but I don't think the thread has been moved yet... Anyway, please keep the help coming! Thanks
Actually your not looking for the USB devices...sorry about that. You want to look in the hard drive section. That's where it'll give you the physical location of the USB disk.
And then all the partitions on /dev/hda show up, but the external doesn't show up (it is plugged in btw, lol). Maybe I should log in as root? I'll give it a try.
[EDIT]
Nope, as I thought, no difference whatsoever! So is there anything else I can do, please?
[/EDIT]
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.