Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
i know that nvidia released drivers for the 2.6 kernel, but ATI has done nothing so far. perhaps the ati drivers are not compatible? i have the same video card as you, and in 2.4.166-athlon kernel, i het aobut 4500 fps in glxgears.
Originally posted by kleptophobiac ehh, I compile my own.
so, to get fglrx working properly, will I have to regress to the 2.4.x kernels?
No you shouldn't, Ati's drivers have their fair share of issues but they build on kernel 2.6 since before it went "official".
Did you compile your kernel with; CONFIG_AGP=m
are they both inserted in the kernel before you try and startx? ...see with lsmod
Also did you select Option "UseInternalAGPGART" "no" when you ran #fglrxconfig
Re-installing the driver after a kernel upgrade only involves rebuilding the drm module.
Get into /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod and run the make.sh script to build the new module, then back in /lib/modules/fglrx to install the module through the make_install.sh script.
Note that this is also needed for 1st time install on distros that won't deal with the driver in it's native .rpm format, i.e. unless you installed the driver using rpm -ivh --force <pkg>.rpm on a compatible distro [...R-H, Mdk, and possibly SUSE] you'll need to build and install the module manually.
If you still can't get it, refer to, and post your errors from,
/lib/modules/fglrx/make<version>.log for built time errors,
/var/log/XFree86.0.log for xserver errors and warnings
dmesg for errors in regards to agp
lsmod to see what modules are loaded.
There are no errors. Everything works fine. The modules load, I have agpgart as a module, it loads, everything does peachy. I'm loading glx. I built the drivers with no issues. I used rpm2tgz and then installed the package, built, installed, and ran the config. I'll go try the external agpgart now.
Originally posted by kleptophobiac There are no errors. Everything works fine. The modules load, I have agpgart as a module, it loads, everything does peachy. I'm loading glx. I built the drivers with no issues. I used rpm2tgz and then installed the package, built, installed, and ran the config. I'll go try the external agpgart now.