LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 02-02-2004, 08:01 PM   #1
jplev22
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Quebec City, Canada
Distribution: Slackware 12.1
Posts: 78

Rep: Reputation: 15
Unhappy kernel 2.6: SATA drive detected but unusable. edx?


Hi, I am trying to setup a 2.6 kernel on my system. I have a promise 20376 softraid controller. I created a slackware custom cd, just to see if it would detect my drive. It gave me the ability to look around a bit because I wasn't confronted with the usual VFS kernel panic when it tried to sda which is my sata drive name in the kernel 2.4.22 of mandrake 9.2.
Here is what I got from dmesg:
SCSI1: sata_promise
Vendor: ATA Model: Maxtor 6y080m0 Rev:0,81
Type: Direct-Access
mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice
serio: i8042 AUX Port at 0x60,0x64 irq 12
serio: i8042 KBD Port at 0x60,0x64 irq 1
input: AT Translated Set 2 Keyboard on isa 0060/serio0
md: linear personality register as nr 1
md: Raid0 personality register as nr 2
md: md driver 0.90.0 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MD_SB_Disks=27
EISA: Probing bus 0 at eisa0
NET: Registered protocol family 2
IP: routing cache hash table of 4096 buckets, 32Kbytes
TCP: Hash tables configuring (established 32768 bind 65536)
NET: Registered protocol family 1
NET: Registered protocol family 8
NET: Registered protocol family 20
ACPI: (Supports S0 S1 S4 S5)
md: Autodetecting RAID arrays
md: autorun ...
md: ... autorun DONE

and then the root fs is mounted into the ram for the bootdisk and I get VFS error that it cannot mount the fs or unknown-block(8,6)
It seems to me that the kernel detected the drive correctly... I don't understand that it is not mountable under sda since it is detected as the fist SCSI device. I notice that when the root fs was mounted into my ram that the ataraid was present under /dev but that it was empty. Also, /dev/eda strangely as the same number of parts than sda under mdk 9.2 but when I try to see the partition table under fdisk it cannot be loaded.
Thanks for reading.

Last edited by jplev22; 02-02-2004 at 08:02 PM.
 
Old 07-26-2005, 05:55 PM   #2
archtoad6
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Houston, TX (usa)
Distribution: MEPIS, Debian, Knoppix,
Posts: 4,727
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 231Reputation: 231Reputation: 231
Do you still need help?

Did you ever get this resolved? How?
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Slackware 10.0 , SATA hard drive, kernel 2.6.13.1 mlukic Slackware 6 09-14-2005 02:53 PM
USB external hard drive nolonger detected after kernel upgrade to 2.6.11-1.27_FC3 Capricorn180 Linux - Hardware 2 06-09-2005 04:27 AM
cannot get new kernel to see SATA drive lopette Linux - Hardware 0 09-12-2004 05:59 AM
SATA drive - 2.6.3 kernel upgrade dufus Linux - General 4 08-26-2004 08:13 PM
kernel 2.4.20 no SATA drive recognition tait Red Hat 4 07-01-2004 04:36 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration