LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-20-2016, 12:57 AM   #1
rblampain
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Western Australia
Distribution: Debian 11
Posts: 1,288

Rep: Reputation: 52
Is audio/video readily usable on most PCs?


I am planning to make short (3-5 min) videos with audio, of the facial of a speaker and I wonder if I should follow certain rules if I want those videos to be easily accessible to a majority of visitors to a web site, presumably visitors that have basic machines.
Most PCs have onboard speaker, is there special considerations to allow visitors to use that speaker to listen to these videos? Is that speaker generally of a suitable quality to listen to a speech lasting 3-5 minutes and understand what is said without getting a headache?
Or should we recommend the purchase and use of "headphones"? Any other tip most welcome.

Thank you for your help.
 
Old 06-20-2016, 06:08 AM   #2
Shadow_7
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: debian
Posts: 4,137
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 874Reputation: 874Reputation: 874Reputation: 874Reputation: 874Reputation: 874Reputation: 874
Rules?

Like keeping the overall bitrate and resolution low enough for average / basic machines to play them? Like normalizing the audio to -6dB? Like filtering (highpass/lowpass) the audio so it mostly contains frequencies capable of being reproduced by the speakers? 40Hz - 16kHz is probably appropriate for many speakers / headphones. Otherwise I'm not sure what you're getting at.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-20-2016, 09:33 PM   #3
rblampain
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Western Australia
Distribution: Debian 11
Posts: 1,288

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 52
Shadow_7
Thank you for your answer, it is perfect and precisely what I need to learn, I would not have had any clue about these aspects. I should have mentioned in my question that I need to learn everything on the subject. Following your answer, I conclude it is mainly a matter of experimenting the parameters you describe on a basic machine like a cheap laptop (I have one) and see what the result is and then safely assume that that is what the majority of visitors who have basic machines will see. If correct, this would solve a big chunk of what I need to learn and simplifies my problem a lot.

One of the remaining question I have is mainly about statistics: is it advisable to have different quality videos in the event that there would be a substantial proportion of visitors using a better quality machine (like "gamers") and the better quality video would make a marked difference in the ease of viewing and listening? This would probably be on the assumption (correct or not) that making a second and better quality product would only involve minimal modifications of the lower quality product, having a recording that can be used for both.

One question I have that is probably very basic but that many visitors may have is the fact that when there is a video appearing on my screen after I visited a web site (regardless of the machine used), I have never had one with sound when it is obvious that the video is a speaker saying something. Is an onboard speaker generally disabled by default or disabled depending on OS installation options or is there something else I missed? This has never been important enough for me to justify investigating.

Last edited by rblampain; 06-20-2016 at 09:36 PM.
 
Old 06-20-2016, 09:35 PM   #4
notKlaatu
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2010
Location: Lawrence, New Zealand
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,077

Rep: Reputation: 732Reputation: 732Reputation: 732Reputation: 732Reputation: 732Reputation: 732Reputation: 732
I highly recommend the .webm format. It has been made quite popular by Youtube, so most people should probably be able to play it with minimal effort.

Not sure if it's worth making different quality videos; it probably is worth at least doing an HD version (720p) for people with good specs, and a standard definition version (720x480 or so) for lower specs. You may even want to release just the audio; if the video is only of the face, it sounds like the video isn't totally necessary to get the information across.

Last edited by notKlaatu; 06-20-2016 at 09:38 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-21-2016, 02:57 AM   #5
Germany_chris
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2011
Location: NOVA
Distribution: Debian 12
Posts: 1,071

Rep: Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497Reputation: 497
Quote:
Originally Posted by rblampain View Post
Shadow_7
Thank you for your answer, it is perfect and precisely what I need to learn, I would not have had any clue about these aspects. I should have mentioned in my question that I need to learn everything on the subject. Following your answer, I conclude it is mainly a matter of experimenting the parameters you describe on a basic machine like a cheap laptop (I have one) and see what the result is and then safely assume that that is what the majority of visitors who have basic machines will see. If correct, this would solve a big chunk of what I need to learn and simplifies my problem a lot.

One of the remaining question I have is mainly about statistics: is it advisable to have different quality videos in the event that there would be a substantial proportion of visitors using a better quality machine (like "gamers") and the better quality video would make a marked difference in the ease of viewing and listening? This would probably be on the assumption (correct or not) that making a second and better quality product would only involve minimal modifications of the lower quality product, having a recording that can be used for both.

One question I have that is probably very basic but that many visitors may have is the fact that when there is a video appearing on my screen after I visited a web site (regardless of the machine used), I have never had one with sound when it is obvious that the video is a speaker saying something. Is an onboard speaker generally disabled by default or disabled depending on OS installation options or is there something else I missed? This has never been important enough for me to justify investigating.
I'm not going to answer this question but I will say that if you want me to watch your videos the need to be 1080, need to be able to go full screen, and they need to be able to be watched on both my Mac and Linux boxes. If one of these doesn't apply I'd just rather read about it
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-21-2016, 04:40 AM   #6
Shadow_7
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: debian
Posts: 4,137
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 874Reputation: 874Reputation: 874Reputation: 874Reputation: 874Reputation: 874Reputation: 874
You could download a youtube video and avprobe / ffprobe it to see what it uses. And yes multiple quality versions are a nice thing to have. Many people have bad internet and bandwidth caps. If a video is mostly audio, no need to download the 4k version to listen to it. Especially if it's a 10 minute video that would otherwise take 4 hours to download.

As far as audio, if a user needs it they'll have it. We've come a long way from the dumb terminals of old that could only beep. If you're worried about it, just add subtitles.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-21-2016, 02:51 PM   #7
jefro
Moderator
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 21,981

Rep: Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625Reputation: 3625
Guess you could give the end use some choice of formats. ??
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-21-2016, 02:57 PM   #8
notKlaatu
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2010
Location: Lawrence, New Zealand
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,077

Rep: Reputation: 732Reputation: 732Reputation: 732Reputation: 732Reputation: 732Reputation: 732Reputation: 732
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow_7 View Post
You could download a youtube video and avprobe / ffprobe it to see what it uses.
Recommended Youtube settings are published by Google: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/1722171?hl=en

Google has invested a lot of work in x264, x265, and webm, so they may be the ones to go with.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Using ffmpeg to fade in audio, BUT original audio from video is gone davidvNY Linux - Newbie 2 05-21-2015 02:50 PM
LXer: Mini-PCs support analog and IP video surveillance LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-13-2013 09:10 AM
Any s/w to cut/add audio files, convert video to audio? ravisingh1 Linux - Software 17 08-28-2013 03:28 PM
smplayer: video+audio stutters with pulseaudio, audio files play fine GamerX Linux - Desktop 1 02-06-2009 08:53 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:39 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration