Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
My laptop seems rather choppy and laggy when I'm trying to move windows around (minimizing & maximizing as well). It takes a second or two for windows to appear or to fade into view. I've experienced these symptoms before and I know my video card isn't fully installed. I used synaptic package manager from the menu. It found fglrx drivers and I downloaded and installed them.
I used to know how to install my drivers when I was using slackware but I forgot and I switched over to Ubuntu. Don't I need to edit xorg.conf and add something with tmpfs /dev/shm in a module file or something? I'm a bit unclear. And I also remember knowing that "mesa" are not the drivers sought. Right now, the radeon drivers are being used when I see the list from "lsmod"
Before I use synaptic package manager, the fglrxinfo command wouldn't work and I wouldn't get that response.
If anyone can help, that'd be excellent!!
Here's some more info you'll might need:
"lspci -v"
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV350 [Mobility Radeon 9600 M10]
Subsystem: Fujitsu Limited. Device 127f
Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 66, IRQ 16
Memory at f0000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=128M]
I/O ports at a000 [size=256]
Memory at ec100000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K]
[virtual] Expansion ROM at ec120000 [disabled] [size=128K]
Capabilities: <access denied>
Kernel modules: radeon, radeonfb
"glxinfo"
red@outpost:~$ glxinfo
name of display: :0.0
display: :0 screen: 0
direct rendering: No (If you want to find out why, try setting LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose)
server glx vendor string: SGI
server glx version string: 1.2
server glx extensions:
GLX_ARB_multisample, GLX_EXT_import_context, GLX_EXT_texture_from_pixmap,
GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer,
GLX_OML_swap_method, GLX_SGI_make_current_read, GLX_SGI_swap_control,
GLX_SGIS_multisample, GLX_SGIX_fbconfig, GLX_SGIX_visual_select_group
client glx vendor string: ATI
client glx version string: 1.3
client glx extensions:
GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_EXT_import_context,
GLX_ARB_get_proc_address, GLX_ARB_multisample, GLX_ATI_pixel_format_float,
GLX_ATI_render_texture
GLX version: 1.2
GLX extensions:
GLX_EXT_visual_info, GLX_EXT_visual_rating, GLX_EXT_import_context,
GLX_ARB_multisample
OpenGL vendor string: DRI R300 Project
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R300 (RV350 4E50) 20090101 AGP 8x x86/MMX/SSE2 TCL
OpenGL version string: 1.4 (1.5 Mesa 7.6)
OpenGL extensions:
GL_ARB_imaging, GL_ARB_multitexture, GL_ARB_texture_border_clamp,
GL_ARB_texture_cube_map, GL_ARB_texture_env_add,
GL_ARB_texture_env_combine, GL_ARB_texture_env_dot3,
GL_ARB_transpose_matrix, GL_EXT_abgr, GL_EXT_blend_color,
GL_EXT_blend_minmax, GL_EXT_blend_subtract, GL_EXT_texture_env_add,
GL_EXT_texture_env_combine, GL_EXT_texture_env_dot3,
GL_EXT_texture_lod_bias
8 GLX Visuals
visual x bf lv rg d st colorbuffer ax dp st accumbuffer ms cav
id dep cl sp sz l ci b ro r g b a bf th cl r g b a ns b eat
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0x21 24 tc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 None
0x22 24 dc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 None
0x68 24 tc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 16 16 16 16 1 0 Slow
0x69 24 tc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 16 16 16 16 1 0 Slow
0x6a 24 dc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 None
0x6b 24 dc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 16 16 16 16 1 0 Slow
0x6c 24 dc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 16 16 16 16 1 0 Slow
0x5f 32 tc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 None
8 GLXFBConfigs:
visual x bf lv rg d st colorbuffer ax dp st accumbuffer ms cav
id dep cl sp sz l ci b ro r g b a bf th cl r g b a ns b eat
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0x21 0 tc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 None
0x22 0 dc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 None
0x5f 0 tc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 None
0x68 0 tc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 16 16 16 16 1 0 Slow
0x69 0 tc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 16 16 16 16 1 0 Slow
0x6a 0 dc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 None
0x6b 0 dc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 16 16 16 16 1 0 Slow
0x6c 0 dc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 16 16 16 16 1 0 Slow
"uname -r"
red@outpost:~$ uname -r
2.6.31-14-generic
Last edited by burningred; 05-21-2010 at 02:08 PM.
I went back into synaptic package manager and selected that fglrx package for uninstallation. I did that, restarted the computer, and here's the command output.
You still have fglrx at least partially installed. It must be *completely* removed. You may also want to reinstall libgl1-mesa-glx and libgl1-mesa-dri, too, though that shouldn't be necessary if you only installed fglrx via synaptic.
Okay, I think I have them all removed. I went into synaptic package manager and did a search for "fglrx" and everything with 'fglrx' in it, I marked for uninstallation. Here's the new output for "glxinfo"
8 GLX Visuals
visual x bf lv rg d st colorbuffer ax dp st accumbuffer ms cav
id dep cl sp sz l ci b ro r g b a bf th cl r g b a ns b eat
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0x21 24 tc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 None
0x22 24 dc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 None
0x68 24 tc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 Slow
0x69 24 tc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 Slow
0x6a 24 dc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 None
0x6b 24 dc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 Slow
0x6c 24 dc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 Slow
0x5f 32 tc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ncon
8 GLXFBConfigs:
visual x bf lv rg d st colorbuffer ax dp st accumbuffer ms cav
id dep cl sp sz l ci b ro r g b a bf th cl r g b a ns b eat
----------------------------------------------------------------------
0x60 0 tc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 None
0x61 0 tc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 Slow
0x62 0 tc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 None
0x63 0 tc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 Slow
0x64 0 dc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 None
0x65 0 dc 0 32 0 r . . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 Slow
0x66 0 dc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 None
0x67 0 dc 0 32 0 r y . 8 8 8 8 0 24 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 Slow
It also says I have direct rendering now.. :\ but it's Mesa induced. I got like 9,000 fps in five seconds on glxgears, which is different but it's not the preferred drivers for my video card.. :-\
It is the preferred drivers for your video card. And glxgears should never be used as a benchmark. If you are having specific issues with actual application performance, let us know.
Should I downgrade my kernel in order to get fglrx to work and maximize my graphics performance? When I went into synaptic package manager i saw fglrx drivers and kernels for it, but they were 2.6.15 or so.. and I have ubuntu 9.10 w/ 2.6.31.14-generic
I'm only insisting on using fglrx because I'd like to play World of Warcraft and Starcraft 2. So I should download ubuntu 8.10 and use that instead, eh?
Last edited by burningred; 05-23-2010 at 02:08 PM.
I'm only insisting on using fglrx because I'd like to play World of Warcraft and Starcraft 2. So I should download ubuntu 8.10 and use that instead, eh?
If the games don't work with the open source drivers, yes.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.