LinuxQuestions.org
LinuxAnswers - the LQ Linux tutorial section.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 12-07-2007, 12:56 PM   #1
unearthed
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2007
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
implementing RAID on WEB server


Hello,

So I'm planning to build a WEB server on Debian, and currently having in mind only these specs:
CPU - 2xXeon 5335 S771 (1333/8MB)
RAM - 4GB FBDIMM ECC
MB - not yet decided, but smth between Supermicro and Intel on S771.
HDDs - 4 x SAS 15k 73GB
RAID - that's where the uncertainty starts.
The server will run Apache+PHP+MySQL+email+ftp(private)+dns and some other services. Of course 'reading' will have bigger privilege. And of course I'm in need of an effective RAID array. There are several questions that disturb me. Should I use RAID5 or RAID10 considering my 4 HDDs? I have been told that RAID10 is slightly faster and RAID5 is very slow in writing. If I decide to use RAID5 it's much better having separate RAID controller, having it's own cache and XOR processor. I can't waste more than $400 for it, so I have been advised to use Adaptec 3405 SAS 4port controller with 128MB cache. But maybe it's just a waste of money and it will be enough to use RAID10 on built-in(aka fakeRAID) SAS controller, since RAID10 doesn't need heavy calculations? RAID5 logical disk will be bigger than RAID10's but I'm not running for a disk-space(140GB is enough for me). Or maybe I SHOULD use separate controller with RAID10, cause I will have monitoring & diagnostic possibilities etc. How Debian will react on all of these issues or maybe he evenly supports everything mentioned in this topic? I'm lost at this point and seek for a suggestion or maybe someone can share his experience? What linux users prefer?

P.S. I remember Apache2 had problems with PHP extensions, due to it's thread nature, but since I will have 8 cores I think Apache2 will get an advantage of it over Apache1.3, is it right?

P.P.S. Intel released new 45nm processors lately, maybe it's worth to wait?

Thanks to everyone in advance!

Last edited by unearthed; 12-07-2007 at 01:00 PM.
 
Old 12-07-2007, 01:26 PM   #2
dyasny
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2007
Location: Canada
Distribution: RHEL,Fedora
Posts: 837

Rep: Reputation: 91
a proper raid controller beats fakeraid on any level. though for linux I'd go for 3ware and not adaptec.
anyhow, why are you thinking so much when there are excellent dell and hp servers stacked with everything out there?
 
Old 12-07-2007, 01:57 PM   #3
unearthed
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2007
Posts: 4

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyasny View Post
a proper raid controller beats fakeraid on any level. though for linux I'd go for 3ware and not adaptec.
anyhow, why are you thinking so much when there are excellent dell and hp servers stacked with everything out there?
Well it's not always true about fakeraid (in some occasions it doesn't lose that much at least). In what criteria 3ware is better than adaptec? But I guess you mean driver support. In my opinion self-build servers gives you some knowledge and experience and are much cheaper than branded servers, and I economy about 30% of it's price.
 
Old 12-07-2007, 02:15 PM   #4
dyasny
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2007
Location: Canada
Distribution: RHEL,Fedora
Posts: 837

Rep: Reputation: 91
yeah, driver support especially.

and as for self built servers - I've been doing that for a very long time, until I started working at the more serious companies. maybe it's just my experience, but the brand is usually worth it in TCO, and the difference isn't that enormous
 
Old 12-07-2007, 05:50 PM   #5
unearthed
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2007
Posts: 4

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally Posted by dyasny View Post
as for self built servers - I've been doing that for a very long time, until I started working at the more serious companies. maybe it's just my experience, but the brand is usually worth it in TCO, and the difference isn't that enormous
Just have taken as an example:
Code:
HP DL380R05 E5335 QC 1P/8M 2G P400	        $ 3301.64
---------------------------------------------------------
Intel XEON 5335	                                 $ 386.56
2GB 667MHZ DDR2 ECC FULLY BUFFERED CL5 D	 $ 115.16
INTEL SERVER BOARD S5000PSLSATA INT.6 	         $ 571.36
HP SMART ARRAY P400/256 CONTROLLER	         $ 576.78
The difference is 1651$ , its 50% of the price. Well I havent included server case, but I dont think it can cost so much. I have a feeling that I'm paying over 1k bucks for the brand and my lazyness - that's why I'm dropping these ideas.
 
  


Reply

Tags
adaptec, apache2, fakeraid, raid


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to write client and server code which is implementing sip ankuraggarwal Programming 4 05-21-2008 06:59 AM
implementing proxy server guy_ripper Linux - Networking 3 12-28-2006 10:09 AM
LXer: Implementing an embedded Linux web app framework LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 08-06-2006 02:21 AM
Which is best for implementing SMTP server in unix.. fork or pthread ? vskgopu Programming 1 05-06-2006 07:06 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:09 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration