LinuxQuestions.org
Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 10-31-2003, 09:40 AM   #1
KlaymenDK
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Denmark
Distribution: FreeBSD v6.0
Posts: 123

Rep: Reputation: 15
How low-end can you go?


Hello everybody.
I'm not sure whether to post this under Newbie, here, or somewhere different, but here goes...

First of all, I'm new to Linux, but fairly veteran in computing at large.
Second, I would like to run some sort of combined firewall and DHCP (and perhaps even print) server for my home LAN, and I'd like to know how far low-end I can reasonably go if I'm to run a Linux server with reasonable performance.

My currently available hardware (and I do plan to buy as little extra as possible) includes an old IBM PC300 6562-200 (200MHz Pentium) and an even older 486SL (an original SNI PCD-4L prototype, actually), both with 32megs of RAM.

Is this completely hopeless, or actually workable to some degree? If at all possible I would prefer to be able to use the 4L because it's fanless, but there are considerable drawbacks: it's got no cdrom, and it can't see hard disks over 540megs. So I've tried valiantly to make sense of Fli4L and a few other Linux-on-a-diskette distros, but haven't got enough skill to make anything work.

I've got broadband, and I plan to connect 2-3 computers on my LAN that should be able to play online games or listening to online radio, but I never do massive up/downloads (as in: media files). So, I would like to have a system that's responsive but not necessarily optimized for massive throughput.

Hopeless? Challenging? What are your Linux-on-a-diskette recommendations? I'm really looking forward to have you all laugh at me!

Cheers,
KlaymenDK
 
Old 10-31-2003, 10:26 AM   #2
registering
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Florida, USA
Distribution: Drake 10.1 Download
Posts: 182

Rep: Reputation: 30
I don't know the specifics of all the HW you mention, but I think what you're proposing is more than enough. We run a Pentium I 90 Mhz w/32 megs RAM at WORK, handling a full T1 connection, about 30 nodes, hosting several websites, 2 of them very interactive. We run RH 9.0. So I think the power you've got is more than enough.

One note: I see you run Drake: Drake only runs on Pentiums and up, so double-check your 486.

Good luck!
 
Old 10-31-2003, 10:34 AM   #3
ToniT
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Distribution: Debian/unstable
Posts: 1,357

Rep: Reputation: 47
If you have two network cards for your 486, i see no reason why this wouldn't work.

As an installation method i would install the system through network (either from internet or local network where other computer is having the contents of an installation cd).

As a distribution I would try to use debian with quite minimal installation. (though i haven't tested debian on a system that lowend, but in 586 it has worked fine.)
 
Old 10-31-2003, 02:16 PM   #4
quest4knowledge
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: gentoo
Posts: 62

Rep: Reputation: 15
The last post has it dead on but I have experiance with almost the same hardware you have. My 1st linux box was a 486DX2 66Mhz with 32M RAM, 2 nics and about 400 megs of drive space. I used a minimal install of debian(which is great for low-end systems but for faster machines I prefer Gentoo.). This machine ran as a router/firewall, dhcp, and mail server with exim and qpopper.

This machine was able to handle a 1Mbit cable connection with ease and couldve done much more if id had more drive space for it. Good luck with your project, it shouldnt be much trouble.
 
Old 10-31-2003, 02:52 PM   #5
synaptical
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: Mint 13/15, CentOS 6.4
Posts: 2,020

Rep: Reputation: 46
yah, no problem. the hardest part will be deciding whether debian, gentoo, or slack.
 
Old 10-31-2003, 04:34 PM   #6
KlaymenDK
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Denmark
Distribution: FreeBSD v6.0
Posts: 123

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Thanks for all your responses. Wow!
I'm quite impressed about what you guys do with such hardware, and am really looking forward to trying this.

I have this copy of Debian lying here so I'll give that a try since I (apparently) want to avoid Mandrake. My biggest problem with Debian is, on my other systems it never could find my keyboard (slight obstacle there ). And my Debian boot floppy asks for an FTP path, no idea what to give it (complete path to subdir, not just ftp site - argh I'm out of my league).

(Still, anyone with some input about single-floppy distros are welcome to post, though I can see already that there's a fair chance I'll end up using a hd).

Cheers!
Klay
 
Old 10-31-2003, 07:58 PM   #7
ToniT
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Distribution: Debian/unstable
Posts: 1,357

Rep: Reputation: 47
A path for what? basedebs.tar? ftp://ftp.dk.debian.org/debian/dists...mages-current/
for drivers.tgz?
ftp://ftp.dk.debian.org/debian/dists...-i386/current/
 
Old 10-31-2003, 08:16 PM   #8
2damncommon
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Calif, USA
Distribution: Debian Wheezy
Posts: 2,838

Rep: Reputation: 48
My home firewall is a Pentium 100 (or so) with 32 MB RAM (500 MB hard drive), my web server (check my www button below) is a Pentium (also around 100) with 64 MB RAM.
The firewall is running Smoothwall, currently.
The webserver is running a minimal Debian install.
I did a net install from the install floppies, but as it was a while ago I do not remember everything.
The Debian.org website has useful documentation.
 
Old 10-31-2003, 10:20 PM   #9
SpeedFreak03
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Delaware
Distribution: Fedora Core 1/Debian Woody
Posts: 47

Rep: Reputation: 15
Try coyote linux. I use it for my NAT box (Pentium 166) and it works great! I think u can use down to a 386 with it.
 
Old 10-31-2003, 10:28 PM   #10
synaptical
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Distribution: Mint 13/15, CentOS 6.4
Posts: 2,020

Rep: Reputation: 46
or try libranet for a painless debian install. you can do a minimal and just get the base system, then update and add what you need with apt-get.
 
Old 11-01-2003, 07:20 AM   #11
maroonbaboon
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney
Distribution: debian
Posts: 1,495

Rep: Reputation: 48
Single floppy firewall/router/gateway:

http://leaf.sourceforge.net/

I've been using one of these for two years - zero failures, zero downtime. Does DHCP, DNS. Sounds similar to Coyote. Would be interesting to see a comparison.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Low-end distribution reccomendation beaucoup Linux - General 4 10-08-2005 03:57 PM
What's the best distro for low end laptop? moo113 Linux - Hardware 6 04-14-2005 10:11 PM
linux on low-end machine redduck666 Linux - General 6 03-28-2005 01:05 PM
A question on low end printer satimis Linux - Hardware 2 09-02-2004 07:09 AM
Which distro for low-end laptop ? jriis Linux - Laptop and Netbook 9 01-05-2004 01:32 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:13 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration