LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 02-27-2006, 05:12 PM   #1
peter_89
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Distribution: Microsoft Windows XP Professional SP2; Slackware Linux 10.2
Posts: 215

Rep: Reputation: 30
High-Quality ATI PCI Express Video Cards


I'm buying a new motherboard soon, and the only good ones I'm able to find include PCI Express ports. So I'd normally just buy a plain PCI video card from NVIDIA, but I've decided it's time to update to the newer standard. The NVIDIA PCI Express cards are too pricey, how bad would an ATI card be on Linux? Are their drivers really as bad as the myths say?
 
Old 02-27-2006, 05:48 PM   #2
rickh
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Distribution: Debian-Lenny/Sid 32/64 Desktop: Generic AMD64-EVGA 680i Laptop: Generic Intel SIS-AC97
Posts: 4,250

Rep: Reputation: 59
My AMD64 includes a built-in PCI Express200. It was kind of a pain in the neck to get set up and working right, but now it does, and I'm very happy with it. I've seen plenty of complaints here about Nvidia Cards as well.

One of the headaches inherent to Linux is getting your hardware working correctly. No real problem ... You just buckle down and do it. THere is plenty of help available here.
 
Old 02-27-2006, 06:49 PM   #3
Electro
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,042

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Really installing nVidia graphics drivers is the easiest than ATI. The problem that people are having is you need the kernel source code or headers, compiler, and edit a line in a file. Installing an ATI card is a little harder because you have to first backup the X11 config file although people have said that the latest ATI drivers have gotten easier. ATI gives you a utility that edits the X11 config file for you. This alright if you have not add anything special. I do not trust programs editing a config file because it tends to screw the setup. IMHO, nVidia way is much better because they do not have a utility to edit the X11 file. The X11 config file is /etc/X11/X86FConfig or /etc/X11/xorg.conf.

If you compare the prices on PCIe (PCI Express) to AGP cards, PCIe will be the cheapest. A GeForce6 6200 costs 60 US dollars for the PCIe version. The AGP versions costs about 20 US dollars more.

nVidia cards work better in Linux because they have the memory bandwidth to handle OpenGL.
 
Old 02-27-2006, 07:51 PM   #4
rickh
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM USA
Distribution: Debian-Lenny/Sid 32/64 Desktop: Generic AMD64-EVGA 680i Laptop: Generic Intel SIS-AC97
Posts: 4,250

Rep: Reputation: 59
Quote:
nVidia cards work better in Linux because they have the memory bandwidth to handle OpenGL
Check victorh's output at the end of this thread, http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...d.php?t=419544
and tell me how much better performance one should expect from an nVidia card.
 
Old 02-27-2006, 11:01 PM   #5
J.W.
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 6,642

Rep: Reputation: 69
I'll have to agree with Electro in recommending nVidia cards. In the past I've spent a great deal of time wrestling with ATI drivers, with decidedly mixed results. Maybe things have changed in the recent past, and I've seen some comments praising the improvements ATI has made in their Linux driver installation support not too long ago, but at least in my own experience nVidia drivers were far easier to install, plus the results were excellent. Of course, the issues I ran into might have been the result of my own incompetence but for me nVidia rocks. Good luck with things whatever your decision
 
Old 02-27-2006, 11:02 PM   #6
Electro
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,042

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickh
Check victorh's output at the end of this thread, http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...d.php?t=419544
and tell me how much better performance one should expect from an nVidia card.
glxgears is a poor benchmark utility. Anandtech's framegrabber is a much better and only graphics card benchmark utility.

OpenGL is more intense than DirectX. OpenGL depends on the memory bandwidth and the GPU/VPU. DirectX depends on the main processor and raw GPU/VPU performance which ATI does well in.

I get ~5000 fps with glxgears in its normal view and not minimized with a GeForceFX 5700 Ultra on a Pentium 4 2.0 GHz (Northwood core).
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
pci express video card reccomendation true_atlantis Linux - Hardware 2 01-01-2006 09:42 AM
Gigabyte Nvidia Gforce 6200 PCI Express Video Card benedictartes Linux - Hardware 1 10-24-2005 05:17 AM
ATI + PCI express + Xorg = help michaeltweak Linux - Hardware 0 01-30-2005 01:08 PM
PCI-Express cards JWatson Linux - Hardware 3 01-07-2005 03:50 PM
Video editing on Linux & PCI Express? dan_aka_jack Linux - Software 0 10-24-2004 10:37 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration