LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Linux - Hardware (http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-hardware-18/)
-   -   HFS+ Formatted Flash Drive Mounts as Read-Only (http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-hardware-18/hfs-formatted-flash-drive-mounts-as-read-only-497585/)

applewax 11-01-2006 11:35 AM

HFS+ Formatted Flash Drive Mounts as Read-Only
 
Hello,

One of my flash drives, which was formatted on my MacBook with the HFS+ filesystem, mounts just fine on my CentOS 4.4 box, however it insists on mounting as read-only. (I have the auto-mount service turned off, as I prefer to mount my volumes manually.) I've tried using a shell script that points to an entry in fstab, and also mounting directly with:

Code:

sudo mount -t hfsplus /dev/sdb2 /mnt/flash
Either of the above methods will mount the drive, but read-only. (Adding the -o rw switch to the mount command does no good.)

Any thoughts on why I can't mount this drive as read-write? Thanks!

David the H. 11-02-2006 08:51 PM

I'm not 100% sure, but I believe HFS+ support in Linux is still incomplete. Similar to NTFS support, reading the file system is safe, but writing to it is not. There may have been some recent advancements I haven't heard about though.

applewax 11-03-2006 08:43 AM

Thanks for the reply. If that's the case, since Mac OS X can't read ext2/3 or Reiser filesystems, I guess I'll have to reformat the drive with a DOS filesystem (which I was trying to avoid). That leads to another question: fdisk lists several DOS choices - which one should I use? (keeping in mind this flash drive will only be used on Macs and Linux PCs)

The choices include: FAT16, FAT16 <32M, W95 FAT32, W95 FAT32 (LBA), W95 FAT16 (LBA), W95 Ext'd (LBA), HPFS/NTFS

Which of these would be best for me, and why? Thanks.

theYinYeti 11-03-2006 09:14 AM

Oh, I've replied to your other thread. So HFS+ is the current native Mac filesystem, isn't it?
Then, isn't it a former Mac filesystem (from the '90) that is better supported by Linux?

Yves.

applewax 11-03-2006 10:00 AM

Oh- we're tangled in two threads. :)

Quote:

Then, isn't it a former Mac filesystem (from the '90) that is better supported by Linux?
I'm not sure. I don't have my Mac with me at the moment, but it does offer a couple of formatting options. I remember there were several choices of HFS+, plus -I believe- UFS and UDF. Other than what I've just Googled, I know little about these.

Thanks,

Joe


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:56 AM.