LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 02-10-2013, 05:36 AM   #1
elliot01
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Distribution: CentOS / RedHat
Posts: 69

Rep: Reputation: 16
Question Help understanding how drives/arrays are detected


Hi all,

I've made such a hash of configuring an external RAID enclosure on a RHEL6 box, I've got to the point where I don't know how I actually got to where I am now!

Anyway, I think I have it working now, but I would like some help understanding something.

In my very limited experience of installing disks under linux before, I have just seen them as /dev/sda, /dev/sdb etc, then created partitions which appear as /dev/sda1, /dev/sda2 etc.

Dmesg shows my device as sdc:
Code:
[root@db2 backups]# grep sdc /var/log/dmesg
sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] 3509329920 512-byte logical blocks: (1.79 TB/1.63 TiB)
sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Write Protect is off
sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Mode Sense: 77 00 10 08
sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Write cache: disabled, read cache: enabled, supports DPO and FUA
 sdc: sdc1
sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Attached SCSI disk
I created a partition but attempting to format /dev/sdc1 resulted in errors. Eventually, by looking at /proc/partitions, I noticed an entry /dev/dm-0.

Now I understand this is something to do with the drive mapper, but that's all I know!

I have been able to format and use it so I guess it's working okay, but could a kind soul please explain, or speculate, why my device has appeared as /dev/dm-0 and not /dev/sdc1?

Thank you
 
Old 02-10-2013, 07:24 AM   #2
David the H.
Bash Guru
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Osaka, Japan
Distribution: Debian sid + kde 3.5 & 4.4
Posts: 6,823

Rep: Reputation: 1946Reputation: 1946Reputation: 1946Reputation: 1946Reputation: 1946Reputation: 1946Reputation: 1946Reputation: 1946Reputation: 1946Reputation: 1946Reputation: 1946
A raid partition is a virtual device, not a physical one. /dev/sdc points to the physical drive, while /dev/dm-0 is the virtual partition that combines the space of multiple discs.
 
Old 02-13-2013, 02:46 AM   #3
elliot01
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Distribution: CentOS / RedHat
Posts: 69

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 16
Hi David the H,

Thank you for your reply, but that doesn't seem to satisfy what I am seeing. Or I am misinterpreting your answer.

My server consists of:
2 x internal HDDs (RAID1) = sda
8 x internal HDDs (RAID10) = sdb
12 x HDDs (external enclosure) (RAID10) = sdc

Code:
[root@db2 ~]# df -h
Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda3             259G  150G   96G  62% /
tmpfs                  16G     0   16G   0% /dev/shm
/dev/sda1              50M  250K   50M   1% /boot/efi
/dev/sda4              16G  168M   15G   2% /tmpfs
/dev/mapper/ddf1_49424d202020202010000060101403793b33ad4db36e5e18
                      1.7T  127G  1.5T   9% /live
/dev/sdb2             184G  163G   12G  94% /newver
/dev/sdb3             184G  105G   70G  61% /test
/dev/sdb4             184G  132G   43G  76% /report
So, why do I see sda1,sda3,sdb2,sdb3 etc but not sdc1? All the above are partitions on various RAIDs.
I accept that sdc is how the physical enclosure is seen by the OS, but why is the partition dm-0 and not sdc1?

Thank you.

Elliot
 
Old 02-15-2013, 12:25 PM   #4
pingu
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Skuttunge SWEDEN
Distribution: Debian preferably
Posts: 1,220

Rep: Reputation: 116Reputation: 116
Could you post the entire configuration?
Like output of "fdisk -l", "cat /etc/fstab", raid configuration I guess can be shown by mdadm in some way but it's a long time since I used it so don't really know.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] drives not detected properly 1314 Linux - Newbie 8 12-10-2012 11:46 AM
Is overlapping two RAID5 arrays on same drives a bad idea ?? Saed.Abdu Red Hat 5 06-04-2011 02:33 PM
few drives are detected but others not detected in fedora 10 deb1bhu Linux - Hardware 5 07-18-2009 10:22 AM
one of three sata drives not being detected gwyndion Linux - Hardware 1 03-20-2007 01:17 PM
Adding additional drives/resizing drives in RAID arrays kheldar Linux - Hardware 1 10-19-2005 01:21 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration