LinuxQuestions.org
Visit Jeremy's Blog.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 03-26-2005, 02:39 AM   #1
invinciblegod
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Posts: 51

Rep: Reputation: 15
hard drive partition types


I know linux cant write to ntfs and can to fat32. however, i just want to know is there any actual advantages of the ext or ext3 file systems? or is it just that linux only works on those 2 file systems?
 
Old 03-26-2005, 03:59 AM   #2
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,415

Rep: Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968Reputation: 1968
fat32 is not a unix compatible file system, ext3 is. fat32 can't handle user ownership and everythign else that goes to be required in any unix file system. linux can run on a whole bunch of filesystems, ext, ext2, ext3, reiserfs, reiserfs4, xfs, jfs and others... use ext3.
 
Old 03-26-2005, 11:27 AM   #3
masonm
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Following the white rabbit
Distribution: Slackware64 13.37 Android 4.0
Posts: 2,248

Rep: Reputation: 46
You are correct in that Linux can write to FAT32 partitions. It's a handy way to share files between windoze and the good OS.

As far as file systems go, ext2 is a very stable non-journaling file system. It's very good for a boot partition and the like. I wouldn't recommend it for your root partition or any partition that contains large amounts of critical data.

ext3 is basically a journaling version of ext2. It's very stable and is the tried and true workhorse of the Linux file systems. The only downside to ext3 is some wasted space if you have a lot of small files as it alocates an entire inode for a small file. Example, say an inode is 1024 bytes. Say the file is 500 bytes. The file wil be allocated to the 1024 resulting in 524 bytes of wasted space.

I use ext3 for the tried and true stability.

reiserfs: a relatively newer journaling file system. It stores files in a structured tree and deals far better with smaller files. It supposedly speeds up disk access due to the way it arranges the files. Has a reputation for being a little less stable due to the way it performs it's journaling although when I used it I never had a problem.

There are other, newer versions of file systems being used and tested. I haven't usedd them and so won't comment.

If you want safe and stable, go with ext3.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best way to partition my hard drive QzarBaron Linux - General 6 06-23-2004 03:49 AM
What is best way to partition you hard drive? sunday2 Linux - Hardware 4 05-16-2004 06:24 PM
New Hard Drive, How to partition Philbert Linux - Newbie 1 01-06-2004 02:16 AM
How do I partition a hard drive? yzrider210 Linux - Newbie 8 12-14-2003 05:07 PM
cannot seem to partition my hard drive boo_reefa Linux - Software 1 06-16-2001 08:48 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:36 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration