LinuxQuestions.org
Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 09-12-2007, 07:45 AM   #1
rblampain
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Western Australia
Distribution: Debian 7
Posts: 833

Rep: Reputation: 35
hard drive advice (raid 1 sata)


Distro Debian Etch stable.
I am going to use a home machine as a server until the traffic requires something more professional. The board is an Asus a7v600-x with 2 sata slots. I planned to use these a a raid 1 set up for data only and keep the IDE channel for the OS.

My questions:
It seems some hard drives are made for RAID (bearing the mention "RAID edition" or similar), is it a true feature or some commercial gimmick?

If it is a true feature, why do they still have a cache (raid is supposed NOT to use the HD cache) and are they worth choosing over other drives?

Does anyone know of current info on the subject that could help me in the selection of the drives?

Thank you for your help.
 
Old 09-12-2007, 11:38 AM   #2
macemoneta
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Manalapan, NJ
Distribution: Fedora x86 and x86_64, Debian PPC and ARM, Android
Posts: 4,593
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 326Reputation: 326Reputation: 326Reputation: 326
There is noting special about RAID drives. Some manufacturers use the term when they implement time-limited error recovery (which they should have anyway; it's more of a bug if they don't). Every disk I/O subsystem (both hardware and software) will consider a drive non-responsive if it doesn't end a command in a given interval. The way to read "RAID Edition" is that the manufacturer is saying "These drives aren't broken".

Cache and RAID are not mutually exclusive; I'm not sure how you got that impression. Some very old hard drives did not properly flush the cache when told to do so. However, that could cause filesystem corruption whether the drive was used for RAID or not.

The most important thing to keep in mind is that RAID is not a substitute for backup. Not even a little bit. Ever.
 
Old 09-15-2007, 12:19 AM   #3
rblampain
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Western Australia
Distribution: Debian 7
Posts: 833

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 35
Thank you for your answer.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Partitioning advice with new SATA drive, multiple OSs nakedlunch Linux - General 7 07-23-2007 05:31 PM
Sata Raid 1 and Single Sata drive drive order issue Kvetch Linux - Hardware 5 03-19-2007 06:50 PM
Need advice on SATA Hard disk and Controller which is 100% Linux Compatible ganja_guru Linux - Hardware 1 08-11-2005 12:25 AM
advice sought: need linux as dual boot. machine has SATA raid 0, fedora? abunn Linux - Newbie 1 09-16-2004 07:38 AM
advice sought: need linux as dual boot. machine has SATA raid 0, fedora? abunn Linux - Hardware 3 09-15-2004 02:33 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:18 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration