LinuxQuestions.org
Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 07-27-2011, 12:58 PM   #1
Thor_2.0
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere on my hard drive...
Distribution: Manjaro
Posts: 2,217
Blog Entries: 23

Rep: Reputation: 279Reputation: 279Reputation: 279
Wink Faster 3d on a 82865G, can it be done?


Greetings programs!

Okay, so, I run Arch (as some know by now...) and lshw about the graphics side of my box said this:

Quote:
*-display
description: VGA compatible controller
product: 82865G Integrated Graphics Controller
vendor: Intel Corporation
physical id: 2
bus info: pci@0000:00:02.0
version: 02
width: 32 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: vga_controller bus_master cap_list rom
configuration: driver=i915 latency=0
resources: irq:16 memory:f0000000-f7ffffff memory:f8400000-f847ffff
...so, can this thing go a little faster at 3D, or at least "think" it? Anything (non drastic) that can be done? Tweaked? Setting the DRI?

I'm in the audio and users groups, not that this matters (at least, I dunnow).

It's just that I'd like to smoothen up my RuneScape experience

Thanks for some light in the dark.

Thor
 
Old 07-27-2011, 01:25 PM   #2
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Main: Gentoo Others: What fits the task
Posts: 15,592
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047Reputation: 4047
The 865G is a really crappy device, the only thing to get that faster is to disable it and use a better graphics card. Even the slowest available should be much better than that chip.
 
Old 07-27-2011, 01:30 PM   #3
Thor_2.0
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2007
Location: Somewhere on my hard drive...
Distribution: Manjaro
Posts: 2,217
Blog Entries: 23

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 279Reputation: 279Reputation: 279
Hmmmm, the itch behind my ears whispered something like that. Snag, I got an ultra-slimline (basically a laptop-in-a-desktop) with only one PCI slot. Means I'll need to get me a card that fits in that slot and accelerates.

Okay, well, this answers the question.

Thanks, TobiSGD

Marking this as solved...
 
Old 07-29-2011, 03:53 AM   #4
cascade9
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,718

Rep: Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904
You might get some improvement if you can increase the size of the shared video RAM. The setting for that will be in your BIOS.

If you do go looking for a PCI card, you want an nVidia or ATI/AMD card. The others arent worth trying. the most common PCI nVidia cards, in order form 'bad' to 'good' is-

MX440, MX4000. Same basic chip, uses 96.XX drivers.
FX5200. Uses 173.XX drivers.
6200. Uses nVidia-current, as do all the following cards.
8400GS.
9400/9500GT.

ATI/AMD PCI cards arent as common. The only cards I've seen much are-

7000- Ancient. Older then the MX440 in some ways. Open source drivers only.
9XXX (mostly 9250). Fairly old, about as old as the nVidia FX cards. Open source drivers only.
3450/5450- Fairly new. Open source and closed ATI/AMD drivers work.

Anything listed here should be much better than i865 video, even the very old ATI/AMD cards with open source drivers only. Probably the pick of them would be the 9400/9500GT or the 3450/5450. I'd probably take the 5450 is they all were the same price, but thats not the way it works. BTW, costs for PCI cards are really variable. What one store will be selling for $100+, another might have for $45.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply

Tags
3d, acceletarion, i915


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Linux 2.6.30 Gets Faster Boot - but is Fedora Faster? LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 06-11-2009 04:40 AM
LXer: Firefox 3.5 Speed Freak: Faster Development, Faster Performance LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 06-10-2009 02:42 AM
LXer: Firefox 3 Beta 4 is 5x faster than IE7, 3x faster than FF2 LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 03-12-2008 05:50 PM
Intel 82865G xorg help! smacarth Linux - Hardware 10 12-04-2006 01:55 PM
Intel 82865G can't work!!!! liangchen Linux - Hardware 1 01-27-2004 07:24 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:58 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration