LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices

View Poll Results: Is this thread helpful?
All the way yes. 1 25.00%
Kind of. 0 0%
Not really. 1 25.00%
Not at all. 2 50.00%
Voters: 4. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 10-07-2010, 09:58 PM   #1
darkstarbyte
Member
 
Registered: May 2010
Location: 3 planets away from the sun.
Distribution: Linux mint, Slackware
Posts: 231

Rep: Reputation: 2
Post Fake raids are becoming common, so I ask you how should it be set up?


Fake raid hard drives are becoming more common and I am wondering how to set them up. This is what I have been told, and you are welcome to disagree (as long as we can agree to disagree).

From what I have seen and heard it appears to me that to set up a fake raid in Linux you partition the separate volumes and format them, but when you install your operating system you have to go into fstab and merge the separate volumes into the root partition.
 
Old 10-08-2010, 03:25 PM   #2
mostlyharmless
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Distribution: Slackware -current (multilib) with kernel 3.15.5
Posts: 1,497
Blog Entries: 12

Rep: Reputation: 154Reputation: 154
Umm, no. Many distros automagically handle fakeraid using dmraid, and I believe mdadm >3.0 handles some of these as well. There are any number of howtos floating around depending on your distro.
 
Old 10-08-2010, 07:21 PM   #3
carlosinfl
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 2,896

Rep: Reputation: 73
I don't know if there's a right or wrong way to configure 'fake RAID' on a specific server so here's my home server:

Code:
Personalities : [raid1]
md2 : active raid1 sda3[0] sdb3[1]
      731977536 blocks [2/2] [UU]

md1 : active raid1 sda2[0] sdb2[1]
      96320 blocks [2/2] [UU]

md0 : active raid1 sda1[0] sdb1[1]
      497856 blocks [2/2] [UU]

unused devices: <none>

Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/md2              688G  2.6G  650G   1% /
/dev/md1               92M   16M   72M  18% /boot

Last edited by carlosinfl; 10-08-2010 at 07:32 PM.
 
Old 10-08-2010, 10:16 PM   #4
jefro
Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2008
Posts: 11,086

Rep: Reputation: 1362Reputation: 1362Reputation: 1362Reputation: 1362Reputation: 1362Reputation: 1362Reputation: 1362Reputation: 1362Reputation: 1362Reputation: 1362
It don't trust them, I have seen too many gimpy raid cards act weird. Get a real hardware raid or don't use them at all.
 
Old 10-09-2010, 05:27 PM   #5
darkstarbyte
Member
 
Registered: May 2010
Location: 3 planets away from the sun.
Distribution: Linux mint, Slackware
Posts: 231

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 2
A hard ware raid is faster than a software raid, but a software raid in theory is more reliable.

Last edited by darkstarbyte; 10-09-2010 at 05:29 PM. Reason: is because it needed it.
 
Old 10-10-2010, 10:39 AM   #6
lpallard
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Milky Way
Distribution: Slackware (various releases)
Posts: 970

Rep: Reputation: 44
Here's my on the subject...

Fakeraid (mobo's so-called raid controllers as well as 99% of those cheap raid add-on cards) are not so reliable, I had 3 bad experiences in the last 10 years with these, with fried controllers and one of them that became nuts and corrupted the whole array... I will never buy again one of these add-on cards (either PCI or PCI-e) for their RAID capabilities. A real RAID (hardware) controller costs lots of $ but is more reliable. There is a reason why some goes for $39 while others go for $799...

Like I just said, if you want hardware controlled RAID, I would uggest going with real controllers, but be ready to spend lots of money. I really don't think for home usage it is worth it.

The problem with hardware (either fakeraid or real raid) is that you add hardware components to the whole system... By adding such extra hardware layer, you increase the probability of failure and decrease the reliability of the system. That's why I said for hardware controlled RAID, I would go with commercial class because these components have a better documented reliability and apparently their quality control (I did not confirm this) is supposed to be better.

I personally use software RAID (using mdadm). I recently lost a almost brand new WD caviar green and most of the data that was on it. My mobo has a fakeraid controller, but like I always do, I enter the bios and setup the controller as standard SATA controller or depending on your BIOS, deactivate it. Then I setup a software raid 1 array with 2 hard drives. My whole system runs on RAID1 while other partitions are only backed up using rsnapshot.

As far as I know, the main differences are speed, performance and reliability. Hardware raid (real one) might be better in the two first, but I believe software RAID is more reliable. Again I should mention instantaneous reliability VS long term reliability...

With fakeraid, I believe you dont have the performance of real raid while you have lower reliability. You get the worst of both worlds.

I might be wrong but this is my experience... I hope it helped.
 
  


Reply

Tags
fake, fakeraid, raid


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
xfree86-common xserver-common xfonts-base missing in etch/lenny unev_21 Debian 2 09-11-2009 02:12 AM
BOGUS.common.04y -> /home/common/Mailbox jayakrishnan Linux - Networking 0 11-19-2005 04:48 AM
How many RAIDs should i use!? timmywo Linux - Hardware 7 11-10-2003 03:55 AM
How many RAIDs should i use!? timmywo Linux - Newbie 1 11-05-2003 06:07 AM
Hardware Raids :( steve65 Linux - Hardware 0 10-14-2002 05:59 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:02 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration