Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I'm planning to buy 2 new monitors to replace my aging 17" monitor. It seems that pretty much all new monitors in the stores (besides online) are 16:9 screens, so I'm assuming I'll end up with a dual widescreen setup.
I'm trying to decide on the size and brand for the monitors. What are considered the better brands? I remember NEC's being really nice when I bought my last one, is that still so (I can't seem to find NEC anywhere besides online though)? How do all of the brands relate on quality, durability, features, etc? NEC, Samsung, Viewsonic, Asus, Acer, HP, Dell, etc, etc, etc!
Also, I primarily use the computer for general use, I run Ubuntu 9.04, and I have a graphics card with dual DVI outputs. I will also be doing a lot of programming on this computer which is one of the main reasons I want two separate screens instead of one giant one (having code on one screen and documentation on the other is the best thing ever). I do a little bit of movie watching and gaming as well. I'm leaning towards two 20" monitors, does that sound reasonable? Is it OK to get dual widescreens instead of 4:3 monitors? Are there certain features/specifications I should definitely look for when buying a monitor (I haven't bought a new monitor in a looooong time)?
Some of the screens are really shiny and I like that look a lot, but I think it would probably be a problem for glare? Is that right?
Thanks for any suggestions!
Note: Most threads and google searches seem to bring up really old discussions about these
which is from Intel and a plugin PCI card (of which I've tried
several). The lspci listing for the cards is below.
The problem is that
1. if I disable the builtin graphics in the
BIOS then it disappears fully from lspci and Xorg generates
the correct xorg.conf.new for the PCI card and I run single
2. if I enable the builtin graphics then xorg.conf.new
as generated includes a dual head setup, but it will not
actually work: the PCI card is ignored with the lines
(==) MACH64(1): Depth 24, (--) framebuffer bpp 32
(==) MACH64(1): Using XAA acceleration architecture
(WW) MACH64: Mach64 in slot 4:6:0 could not be detected!
(II) UnloadModule: "mach64"
and the result is that the Intel head works fine and the
ATI one has no signal.
I think the problem is that the BIOS is disabling the
PCI graphics card when the Intel builtion option
is set and, amazingly, the BIOS has no option for
requesting both be live, as far as I can see.
This is a new motherboard with the latest BIOS, so
I cannot easily upgrade it to have better behaviour.
I feel the solution might be to do some setpci commands
to the PCI card so that the "[disabled]" attributes
are removed. I once wrote some PCI enabling code
that ran on a bare motherboard, so I do have the
full details of how to do this somewhere, but I think
there must be a command arg to /sbin/setpci that I can use?
Thanks for any suggestions.
Alan J Bond.
$ lspci -s 0:2 -v
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82G33/G31 Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 10) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Subsystem: Intel Corporation 82G33/G31 Express Integrated Graphics Controller
Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 27
Memory at fe300000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=512K]
I/O ports at f140 [size=8]
Memory at d0000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]
Memory at fe100000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1M]
Expansion ROM at <unassigned> [disabled]
Capabilities: <access denied>
Kernel driver in use: i915
Kernel modules: i915
$ lspci -s 4:6 -vv
04:06.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage II+ 215GTB [Mach64 GTB] (rev 9a) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Control: I/O- Mem- BusMaster- SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping+ SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap- 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSEL=medium >TAbort- <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
Region 0: Memory at fd000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [disabled] [size=16M]
Region 1: I/O ports at d000 [disabled] [size=256]
Region 2: Memory at fe030000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [disabled] [size=4K]
Expansion ROM at 80000000 [disabled] [size=128K]
Kernel modules: atyfb