LinuxQuestions.org
Go Job Hunting at the LQ Job Marketplace
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 02-13-2004, 07:52 AM   #1
nicktoop
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 10

Rep: Reputation: 0
Does "ac97 & RH8" imply "buy a Sound Blaster Live"?


Hi,
I have a problem with the sound on my PC which uses the AC97 chipset and is running RH8.

'unname -r' reports...
2.4.20-18.8

/var/log/messages contains....

Feb 12 12:07:20 linux2 kernel: ac97_codec: AC97 Audio codec, id: ADS114 (Unknown)
Feb 12 12:07:20 linux2 kernel: i810_audio: AC'97 codec 2 supports AMAP, total channels = 2
Feb 12 12:07:20 linux2 modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module sound-service-0-3

and 'grep sound /etc/modules.conf' yields

alias sound-slot-0 i810_audio
post-install sound-slot-0 /bin/aumix-minimal -f /etc/.aumixrc -L >/dev/null 2>&1
|| :
pre-remove sound-slot-0 /bin/aumix-minimal -f /etc/.aumixrc -S >/dev/null 2>&1 |
| :


I have spoken to the supplier of my machine and he says.."Yes, there is a problem!" and "I don't know, look on the web".

I have looked through the archives of linuxquestions.org (there have been many related postings) but as far as I can tell there is no solution although a partial one may be possible. It appears that RH8 makes a mistaken assumption about the sound chip system based on its DAC.

I have tried the Redhat site and a general Google search. There are many hits (often in foreign languages that I can't understand :-( ) but I am left with the impression that "better men than I have failed" and as one poster said, it may be best to "buy a Sound Blaster Live Card". This is rather defeatist.... if you feel it to be unduly defeatist please can you suggest a suitable link.

It has been suggested that a newer kernel will solve the problem. Is there a kernel which is known to work? If so, must I compile it myself or can I get it "ready made"? I am willing to try compiling a kernel but fear that as a "newbie" I don't have the skill or knowledge to do this without a walkthrough. However, I will "give it a go" if this is likely to solve my problem.

Thank you....grovel grovel.
 
Old 02-13-2004, 08:14 AM   #2
b0uncer
Guru
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Distribution: CentOS, OS X
Posts: 5,131

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
compiling a kernel is not that big deal...it's quite easy after you've done it few times and with a little help you'll surely succeed. but before going into that, I suggest you shoot a question to your modules, like this:

Code:
modprobe -l | grep sound
so you get the names of all the modules that are related to sound. chech out what pops up, and if you see something that could have something to do with your soundcard, try to

Code:
modprobe <modulename>
where <modulename> is the name of the module (without any path) you wish to load. try this if it helps...and for the kernel recompilation, what you need to do if you need to compile your own kernel, is to find the module you truly need for your card and enable it either in kernel or as a module. but your card seems (to me, at least) quite ordinary so stock kernels should have support for it..?

I myself have not-so-new soundcard, not any sb live but somekind of integrated card...at first (with my Arch) it didn't work out, and I figured out that my kernel didn't have a module/builtin support for it...I added it & recompiled, rebooted and got my music play

so check out the modules you have, and try modprobing them...
 
Old 02-13-2004, 08:37 AM   #3
nicktoop
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 10

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
Wow,

That a bit embarrasing..all I need to do is type

modprobe ac97

Thanks
 
Old 02-13-2004, 08:53 AM   #4
PenguinPwrdBox
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: /illinois/chicago
Distribution: Slackware/Gentoo/FC/RHEL
Posts: 568

Rep: Reputation: 30
You may also be interested on knowing that as of late - there has grown a huge base of support for the Intel i8x0 chipset. In fact, the machine I am posting this on is an i810 .
You can find a lot of patches out there nowadays, for both sound and video, so that you are not running generic drivers, and can use the full capacity of both the sound and video sets. This machine is running 1600x1200@24 bit depth, and it's flawless - much better than the "beta" drivers that were out less than 6 months ago. Try these:

http://www.intel.com/support/graphics/linux/audio.htm

http://support.intel.com/support/gra.../CS-009129.htm
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Telling people to use "Google," to "RTFM," or "Use the search feature" Ausar General 77 03-21-2010 11:26 AM
"Xlib: extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display ":0.0"." zaps Linux - Games 9 05-14-2007 03:07 PM
"User" & "System" CPU load difference JJX Linux - General 3 06-06-2004 01:42 AM
No Sound: "Sound Blaster Live 5.1" & Knoppix 3.2 beforewisdom Linux - Hardware 1 04-21-2003 08:02 PM
Monthly Archiving Script... help with "date" & "cron" Supp0rtLinux Linux - Software 3 01-03-2003 09:29 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration