LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 10-29-2012, 04:50 AM   #1
Ulysses_
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2009
Posts: 645

Rep: Reputation: 42
Do high-end SSDs last as long as desktop hard disks?


If high-end SSDs are used for servers that operate them non-stop 24-7, maybe they are built to last. Perhaps as long as low-end hard disks? Meaning, equal number of terabytes transfered until the die?

If so, might high-end server SSDs make a good swap space too?

Thinking of the 480GB revodrive 3 x2 as high-end, should I?

Last edited by Ulysses_; 10-29-2012 at 04:57 AM.
 
Old 10-29-2012, 05:18 AM   #2
cascade9
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,718

Rep: Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904
Enterprise SSDs should last a lot longer than desktop drives. IMO even a normal desktop SSD shouldlast at least as long as a mechanical HDD.

Using intel as an example-

Intel 520 series ('desktop' level)- MTBF is 1,200,000 hrs.
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/...ification.html

Intel 710 series ('enterprise' level) MTBF is 2,000,000 hrs.
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/...ification.html

You cant really compare MTBF between manufacturers, as different manufacturers have different methods to get a MTBF. That said, I know the that 'top end' desktop drives and many 'enterprise' level drives came with MTBFs in the range of 1,000,000 to 1,200,000 hrs.

SSDs arent great for swap space. They have a limited number of writes. Even the 'enterprise' level drives with eMLC ('e'nterprise MLC, modded for more write cycles than consumer-grade MLC flash) have a limited write cycle.

RAM is cheap, motherboards haev huge limits these days, just buy more.

Revodrive 3 X2 is not enterprise level. Because its using a RAID 0 setup its less reliable than normal SSDs. The nearest equivilent from OCZ that is enterprise is a VeloDrive. 300GB is currently $1500+. Its also slower than the revodrive 3 X2.

Enterprise doesnt come cheap.
 
Old 10-29-2012, 05:47 AM   #3
Ulysses_
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2009
Posts: 645

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 42
If the policy is, "dump the drive at the first failure" (no matter if the failure is terminal like an ssd running out of flash writes, or an intermittent failure like a mechanical drive sector going bad), then do enterprise SSD's and desktop mechanical drives have the same life expectancy ("mean time to dumping") or not?
 
Old 11-08-2012, 05:40 AM   #4
cascade9
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,718

Rep: Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904Reputation: 904
SSDs shouldn't run out of writes for a very long time. Most people dont trash HDDs when a sector goes bad.

Its impossible to say, 1 HDD or SSD isnt statistically significant.

Last edited by cascade9; 11-08-2012 at 06:43 AM. Reason: typo
 
Old 11-08-2012, 06:26 AM   #5
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Midwest USA, Central Illinois
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 11,289
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 1446Reputation: 1446Reputation: 1446Reputation: 1446Reputation: 1446Reputation: 1446Reputation: 1446Reputation: 1446Reputation: 1446Reputation: 1446
Member Response

Hi,

Way to much 'FUD' out there concerning 'SSD' life-cycle. Most new consumer 'SSD' do out last the users system needs. Most users are not saying; 'When is my HDD going to fail?'.

Most just use the device and hopefully make 'backups' for when some issue does occur for either a 'HDD' or 'SSD'. Then restore from backup when they get a new drive, be it either mechanical or solid state. Personally, I do use both style of drives. Prefer 'SSD' for speed and 'HDD' for cheap intermediate storage.

One can be very paranoid or get informed so no fears. Others just stick their head in the sand.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
thoughts and comments on new high-end hp desktop computer? mosca Linux - Hardware 13 09-11-2010 12:47 AM
Linux & SSDs (Solid State Disks) undoIT Linux - Hardware 10 12-19-2009 04:39 PM
Two Hard Disks on IBM Desktop and 4 OSs zillah Solaris / OpenSolaris 41 12-18-2005 07:34 PM
Two Hard Disks on IBM Desktop and 4 OSs zillah Fedora 3 12-09-2005 05:52 AM
How to get hard disks onto desktop fullofhope Linux - Hardware 1 01-20-2005 07:52 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:05 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration