Linux - HardwareThis forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
I have an IBM Thinkpad A22P with an ATI Rage Mobility M3 128, running Debian Sarge with Sid Xorg and KDE.
Just finished grinding through the painful Xorg 7.0 update (which seems to be completely undocumented), and everything's working now. Apparently none of the required libs is a dependency in apt-get, so I had to trip over each one to find out what was needed. I chanced this upgrade because Xorg 6.9 has a memory leak which fills swap after a day or so of hard work.
Direct rendering is working, because:
name of display: :0.0
display: :0 screen: 0
direct rendering: Yes
... and glxgears runs faster than when I remove libGL.so.
HOWEVER, glxgears isn't running what I'd call fast (4 seconds per revolution for the red gear), and my CPU is pegged. The whole idea of DRI is to offload work from the CPU, so I don't understand what it's doing?
I've gone through the troubleshooting here:
and it seems to be out of date (or not for Debian), as it insists that I use the libGL in /usr/X11R6/lib, rather than the one in /usr/lib. But when I do that, direct rendering becomes "No". Also, the .deb package installs the library to /usr/lib, so apparently that's the right place. Another odd thing about the troubleshooting page is that glxinfo is supposed to have a line like:
libGL: OpenDriver: trying /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/dri/r128_dri.so.
... but no such animal, and yet it says dri "yes".
glxgears no longer prints out the FPS, so I don't know objectively how fast it is. It's been criticized as 'not being a benchmark'... but having something, is better than having nothing.
Any way to find out what my CPU is doing/ if I can speed up DRI?
The idea is I want ultimately to enable video capture, so I can record TV shows.
Download a demo of Unreal Tournament 2004 and benchmark scripts from reviewers. Then compare the results.
The utility glxgears only shows that 3D rendering is working with out any problems.
If the video capture is from ATI, then there is very, very little support for it. You can check out the gatos project. Also if you want TV out, then there is no support for it. For a notebook computer, I suggest nVidia graphics chips because nVidia supports dual output and TV out.
xorg version 7 is still experimental. Try 6.8 instead.
# tar -zxvf UT2004-LNX-Demo3334.run.gz
tar: This does not look like a tar archive
tar: Skipping to next header
tar: Archive contains obsolescent base-64 headers
gzip: stdin: unexpected end of file
tar: Child returned status 1
tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
... and no instructions. Opening directly from ftp to Konq: "An error occurred while trying to open the archive". Tried Atari and FileFront servers.
Xorg v7.0 is running well, and is faster than 6.9. It's a PITA to install though, due to modularity and no indication what libs to install, but in general they're libX???.so.n, within the libx???n packages. Too early to know whether it has the memory leak. Who knows, maybe it's Gimp leaking into Xorg, for all I know, but Xorg v6.9 was swelling.
The ATI drivers in Xorg x7.0 are in fact the ones from the Gatos project, and hardware acceleration is set up automatically. Purported to be much faster, as completely rewritten. I need to learn how to set up capture. I believe the r128 driver recently got video out; it definitely got pageflip recently. Good to know that I shouldn't waste my time with the proprietary drivers, thanks.
When I run just the UT2004 demo, it comes up one frame at a time, like a slooow slide show. A frame every 7 seconds or so.I finally get to the main menu (Single Player, Join Game) after about 5 minutes.
So I ran the benchmark script here. It basically showed a picture of a gun pointed at a wood wall, and the wall alternated frames between focused and out-of-focus, every 10 seconds. I stopped the benchmark after an hour and a half, and got these pitiful results: UT2004 Build UT2004_Build_[2004-02-10_03.01]
GenuineIntel PentiumPro-class processor @ 998 MHz
Mesa DRI Rage 128 Mobility 20041026 AGP 2x
I don't know what to do now. I tried following Gentoo's instructions by not depending on the kernel DRM driver, but it is not loading Xorg's driver; so the next step is to compile DRM, which requires removal of libdrm, which forces removal of essentially all GUI software, and I'm not going to do that.
With the kernel module I do get DRI, however for 3D it's using Mesa. I don't need 3D, and I should think 2D DRI is integral to Xorg, so record/playback of video should be fine, but I can't prove that.
glxinfo is just not loading r128_dri.so, like it says in Userspace setup. It says that if this is the case, "Make sure it's the one in /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL, or a link in /usr/lib to the one in /usr/X11R6/lib."
Well, I now find that I have /usr/lib/libGL.so, and that that comes from libgl1-mesa-glx. But the apt system will not let me remove libgl1-mesa-glx or libglu1-mesa without deinstalling virtually every GUI function on my machine. I do not know how to apt-get remove while ignoring dependencies. And further, there does not seem to be a libGL.so in any Xorg 7.0 package to take its place. So what is the system supposed to fall back on, and what is the DRI troubleshooting guide talking about?
I think it's clear that this is my last obstacle to getting 3D hardware acceleration working.
You clearly do not have functioning DRI, even though glxinfo says you do. This is most probably some library mismatch. Try running 'strace glxgears 2> glxgears.log' to see exactly what libs it's loading (or trying to load).
Thanks, but when I realized my libGL.so was from the Mesa project, and the Debian apt system would not let me deinstall it without taking out most of my other GUI stuff, I just renamed libGL.so and libGLU.so and rebooted. The theory is that these are actually replaced by Xorg's r128_dri, to give hardware 3D.
Now when I run run glxinfo, it still does not load the r128_dri driver, and it says, "direct rendering: No". However I can play movies 3/4 the size of my screen, and use only 30% CPU (1 GHz), so I am sure I'm getting 2D hardware acceleration. This is all I need, as the goal is video in the first place.
I've spent three whole days on this now, and I must move on. 3D is pretty busted. Just got the km driver (Gatos) compiled, and now am attempting AVView, but it's failing to compile.