LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 01-25-2006, 07:17 AM   #1
[42]Sanf0rd
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Distribution: Open Suse 10.2
Posts: 50

Rep: Reputation: 15
cannot access SATA hard drive in Fedora Core 4


I recently installed Fedora Core 4 on my machine (because I lost my SimplyMepis disk and I'm just going to wait until 3.4 comes out to download the ISO). I was dual-booting, but found out how to get everything I need working natively in Linux or through Wine and/or Cedega. So I'm 100% straight Linux now.

Here's how my system is set up hard drive wise:

1 40GB IDE that is my OS
1 160GB SATA that is my "storage" drive.

When I was dual-booting, I had the 40GB split in half (NTFS for Win2k and ReiserFS for Mepis) and the 160GB SATA formatted as FAT32 (so that both OS's had read/write abilities).

Well when I reformatted the 40GB to just straight Linux, I'm using a distro that I'm not familiar with. With Mepis, all you have to do is click the icon to the /mnt/sda1 drive to mount it, or in terminal type
Code:
mount /mnt/sda1
But I'm not familiar with how Redhat has things going with Fedora.

I go to the "Hardware Browser" under "Applications" (I'm using Gnome btw, just to try it out) and I see both hard drives listed. The 40G is /dev/hda and the SATA is /dev/sda

So when I try to mount it:
Code:
[root@localhost ~]# mount /dev/sda
mount: can't find /dev/sda in /etc/fstab or /etc/mtab
But I can't mount it. Therefore, I can't use it.

Anyone familiar enough with Fedora to tell me how I can get to my SATA drive?

I mainly want to get everything burned off of it so when I reinstall Mepis I can use the SATA as the primary drive and the IDE one as a "backup".
 
Old 01-25-2006, 08:52 AM   #2
Matir
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Distribution: Debian, Arch
Posts: 8,507

Rep: Reputation: 128Reputation: 128
First off, you'll be wanting to mount a partition of the whole thing, so do make sure you mount /dev/sda1, not just /dev/sda. Secondly, you may need to add a line into /etc/fstab for it, though FC4 should've done so for you.
 
Old 01-25-2006, 08:59 AM   #3
[42]Sanf0rd
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Distribution: Open Suse 10.2
Posts: 50

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
never manually updated FSTAB before... how exactly should i write it (don't wanna mess it up, ya know)


whoda thunk that Redhat would have need for more "hands-on" stuff? i thought it would've been the other way around.

Last edited by [42]Sanf0rd; 01-25-2006 at 09:09 AM.
 
Old 01-25-2006, 09:15 AM   #4
Matir
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Distribution: Debian, Arch
Posts: 8,507

Rep: Reputation: 128Reputation: 128
I don't think Fedora has ever claimed to be the most user friendly.

In any case, a line for this would look something like:
Code:
/dev/sda1 /mnt/fat vfat user,noauto 0 0
 
Old 01-25-2006, 02:33 PM   #5
RottenMutt
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: dfw
Distribution: Latest Fedora Release
Posts: 195

Rep: Reputation: 31
fedora seems to use /media as a replacement for /mnt, I would probably use /media/sda1 (maybe you like /media/data). don't forget to create the directory /media/sda1 (or what ever you call it).
 
Old 01-25-2006, 05:52 PM   #6
[42]Sanf0rd
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Distribution: Open Suse 10.2
Posts: 50

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
thanks for the suggestions guys!

I'm in class right now but when I get home, I'll give this a shot and I'll let you know if it worked or not.
 
Old 01-26-2006, 06:06 AM   #7
[42]Sanf0rd
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Distribution: Open Suse 10.2
Posts: 50

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
woo hoo! it worked!

and Rottenmutt, good call on mkdir - i totally would've forgotten that step.

thanks guys!

once again proving why LQ is the best damn site in the world!


of course, there's a vote on the mepis main page today as to whether or not 3.4 is ready for release, so i'll probably just be reformatting it in a few days anyway, but hey, it got me by for now
 
Old 01-26-2006, 02:37 PM   #8
Matir
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: San Jose, CA
Distribution: Debian, Arch
Posts: 8,507

Rep: Reputation: 128Reputation: 128
Glad you got it working. And yeah, LQ is pretty nice.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Added a 2nd Sata Drive installed Fedora Core 5, BIOS Doesn't See 2nd Drive. mtmcc1 Linux - General 3 12-03-2005 04:01 PM
Fedora Core 3 unable to find SATA hard drives Denali03 Linux - Newbie 1 03-17-2005 08:14 PM
Installing Fedora Core 3 test3 on a SATA drive Bloemkoolvreter Linux - Newbie 0 10-29-2004 04:50 AM
Updated to Fedora Core 2 and can't get at my second hard drive redhatman Linux - Newbie 2 08-10-2004 03:19 PM
Fedora Core 2 on SATA-drive Remuz Fedora - Installation 4 07-18-2004 12:31 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:39 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration