LinuxQuestions.org
View the Most Wanted LQ Wiki articles.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 11-12-2012, 10:50 AM   #1
satimis
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,385

Rep: Reputation: 52
ASUS M5A97 motherboard


Hi all,

Motherboard
===========
ASUS M5A97 Pro seems out. Now "ASUS M5A97 R2.0 AMD 970,DDR3,USB3.0,SATA3 6Gb/s,ATX M/B" is on the market. What will be the difference in performance for working with;

CPU - AMD 8-Core FX-8150 3.6GHz/16M
RAM - Corsair Vengeance CMZ32GX3M4X1600C10 DDR3 1600MHz 32GB Kit (4x8GB)

TIA

B.R.
satimis
 
Old 11-12-2012, 12:54 PM   #2
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 15,438
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4001Reputation: 4001Reputation: 4001Reputation: 4001Reputation: 4001Reputation: 4001Reputation: 4001Reputation: 4001Reputation: 4001Reputation: 4001Reputation: 4001
Both use AMD's 970 chipset, so the expected performance difference should be about 0%. The real difference for them realeasing the R2.0 was to add the "Windows 8 Ready" to it.
 
Old 11-12-2012, 01:11 PM   #3
cascade9
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,718

Rep: Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903
+1 to TobiSGD, no real difference. To be a hardware nut....not quite.

M5A97 is the original version of the M5A97 R2.0. The R 2.0 version has more USB 3.0 ports (an extra header for x 2 ports), updated LAN from Rtk 8111E to F, and it got 'Network iControl' which I havent read up on (but sounds like something I wouldnt care less about).

The M5A97 Pro has a different, better sound chip (Rtk ALC892) and jmicron JMB362 eSATA ports that the M5A97 doesnt have. IIRC its also got better voltage controls (wont matter to normal users).
 
Old 11-12-2012, 08:39 PM   #4
satimis
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,385

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 52
Hi all,

Thanks for your advice.

What is the difference in performance between;
ASUS M5A99X EVO AMD 990X,DDR3,USB3.0,SATA3 6Gb/s,ATX M/B

and;
M5A97 R2.0
M5A97 Pro

M5A99X EVO
is approx 50% more expensive

satimis

Last edited by satimis; 11-12-2012 at 09:37 PM.
 
Old 11-13-2012, 12:38 AM   #5
cascade9
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,718

Rep: Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903
M5A99X Evo is a990X chipset, M5A97* are 970 chipset.

The 990X has more PCIe x16 slots (1 x16 or 2 x8, 1 x4). Support for nVidia SLI (multipule GPUs running together). JMicron JMB362 with 2 x eSATA ports and 2 x SATA-II internal ports. IEEE 1394 (firewire) controller. Rtk ALC892 sound chip.

990X chipset boards sometimes overclock a little better. If you arent going to be doign major overclocks, or running video cards in SLI/Crossfire, theres no real difference between 970 and 990X chipsets.
 
Old 11-13-2012, 01:19 AM   #6
satimis
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,385

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by cascade9 View Post
M5A99X Evo is a990X chipset, M5A97* are 970 chipset.

The 990X has more PCIe x16 slots (1 x16 or 2 x8, 1 x4). Support for nVidia SLI (multipule GPUs running together). JMicron JMB362 with 2 x eSATA ports and 2 x SATA-II internal ports. IEEE 1394 (firewire) controller. Rtk ALC892 sound chip.

990X chipset boards sometimes overclock a little better. If you arent going to be doign major overclocks, or running video cards in SLI/Crossfire, theres no real difference between 970 and 990X chipsets.
I'm not prepared overclocking nor running video cards.

I'll go back to PRO, if not available then R.20. My only worry on R.20 is sound. Whether I can find driver for Linux.

What is "jmicron JMB362 eSATA ports" and its use? Thanks

satimis
 
Old 11-13-2012, 01:31 AM   #7
cascade9
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,718

Rep: Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903
Quote:
Originally Posted by satimis View Post
I'm not prepared overclocking nor running video cards.
You'll be running one video card though, unless you want a 'headless' system.

Quote:
Originally Posted by satimis View Post
I'll go back to PRO, if not available then R.20. My only worry on R.20 is sound. Whether I can find driver for Linux.
Realteck has drivers up, but you shouldnt need them with recent linux distros. Support for the ALC892 is in alsa 1.0.22 and newer.

There is a few 'R2.0' versions, M5A97 EVO R2.0, M5A97 LE R2.0 and M5A97 R2.0.

Quote:
Originally Posted by satimis View Post
What is "jmicron JMB362 eSATA ports" and its use? Thanks
'e'xternal SATA. jmicron controllers are junk, even with windows. Linux support is from jmicron is fairly bad.

BTW, the newer FX-83XX CPUs are out. A little faster, a little more power efficent, probably worth getting over a FX-81XX.

Last edited by cascade9; 11-13-2012 at 01:33 AM.
 
Old 11-13-2012, 10:57 PM   #8
satimis
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,385

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by cascade9 View Post
You'll be running one video card though, unless you want a 'headless' system.
Yes, one VGA card and one display.

Quote:
BTW, the newer FX-83XX CPUs are out. A little faster, a little more power efficent, probably worth getting over a FX-81XX.
AMD FX-8300 Vishera (x86 Piledriver) 8 Core CPU
http://wccftech.com/amd-fx8300-vishe...d-benchmarked/
clock of 3.3-3.9GHz

NOT much increase compared to;
AMD 8-Core FX-8150 3.6GHz/16M CPU [AM3+]

Other advice noted. Thanks

satimis
 
Old 11-13-2012, 11:27 PM   #9
cascade9
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Brisneyland
Distribution: Debian, aptosid
Posts: 3,718

Rep: Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903Reputation: 903
Quote:
Originally Posted by satimis View Post
AMD FX-8300 Vishera (x86 Piledriver) 8 Core CPU
http://wccftech.com/amd-fx8300-vishe...d-benchmarked/
clock of 3.3-3.9GHz

NOT much increase compared to;
AMD 8-Core FX-8150 3.6GHz/16M CPU [AM3+]
Dont just compare MHz.

In general the FX-83XX and other 'piledriver' FX CPUs run faster, and use less power than the older 'bulldozer' FX CPUs-

http://www.anandtech.com/show/6396/t...-fx4300-tested

http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu...d-fx-8350.html

FX-8300 is the bottom of the 4 module FX-83XX CPUs. FX-8320 is the closest to the FX-8150 in pricing. I'd get a FX-8320 over the FX-8150 any day.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
About ASUS motherboard satimis Linux - Hardware 6 08-22-2012 03:47 AM
Which ASUS motherboard to get for FC6 cizzi Linux - Hardware 2 01-24-2007 11:07 PM
ASUS Motherboard cthomas Linux - Hardware 9 12-15-2006 08:48 PM
pb with the motherboard asus alban Linux - Hardware 1 09-24-2003 05:03 PM
driver for asus motherboard vher Linux - Hardware 12 07-02-2003 01:31 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration