LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Hardware
User Name
Password
Linux - Hardware This forum is for Hardware issues.
Having trouble installing a piece of hardware? Want to know if that peripheral is compatible with Linux?

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 09-20-2005, 02:52 PM   #1
lord_zoo
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 30

Rep: Reputation: 15
Asus K8S-MX & Fedora core 4


i'm trying to install FC4-64 on this MB, but as soon as the initrd.img is going to be loaded into ram, the pc reboots.

does anyone have an idea why this happen?

Specs are:
MB Asus k8s+mx
AMD Sempron 64 2500
1gb ram dual channel
2 sata 80gb desktar hitachi

TIA.
 
Old 09-20-2005, 03:57 PM   #2
koolguy91
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Distribution: Fedora Core 3 and 4
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
I am also having the same problem beside this if I try to configure the LAN card
SIS 191/190 MAC + RealTeck 8201 CL 10/100 LAN PNY on the same
ASU K8SMX Mother board
without a SATA hard disk it is not detecting
and on SATA hard disk it is not intsalling any Linux Destro
 
Old 09-20-2005, 11:12 PM   #3
lord_zoo
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 30

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
i just switch the motherboard (downgrade the machine) to a sempron 2400 with a A7V400-MX SE.

Not happy with it, but, well, was a (crappy) solution.

Thanks.

PS: I Still want to know if someone has a solution for the K8S mother issue.
 
Old 10-06-2005, 05:34 PM   #4
endzYme
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: USA
Distribution: SuSE 9.0 - 9.1 / RH 9 / MEPIS
Posts: 7

Rep: Reputation: 0
Same Problem

Same thing happens to me, with both x86_64 and 32

No clue...

any help would be awesome.
 
Old 10-06-2005, 06:29 PM   #5
lord_zoo
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 30

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
At least I hope this would be fixed in the next version of the distro.
 
Old 10-17-2005, 09:01 PM   #6
Freddie_hg
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Posts: 2

Rep: Reputation: 0
Question Same problem here

I have been having the same problem where the PC is rebooting at the exact same spot.

I have a K8S-MX mobo, 512 meg ram, on board video/sound/network. No floppy, only CD-RW, and 80GB SATA drive.
I am setting up 2 machines the exact same, Win 2000 installed perfectly on it, so now I want to wipe the hard drive and install FC4, but it rebooting it preventing me.
I know I will have issues using the (only) 80GB SATA drive, but I will deal with that when I get to it, right now, I want to boot the computer, and at least get in to the installer.

Knoppix works find on the machine, it boots, and is operational.

has anyone thought of what a solution could be?
Could my install disks be corrupted? I installed FC4 on another machine 6 months ago with the same disk set. Is it a distro issue?
Looking on the net it looks like other people have installed this package on this motherboard, but some other people have been having the same problem as us.

Steve
 
Old 10-18-2005, 01:31 AM   #7
lord_zoo
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 30

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
AFAIK it seems to be a distro issue, since if you try to install it with a IDE HD it does the same damn thing.

In my case, I was using a Sempron 64 NOT a Athlon 64, and I think this could be important to have in mind if you try to find a solution. Somehow I think this cpu is not fully compatible. AMD builds very good processors, but I never liked the Sempron series, don't know why, just hate them.

Cheers.
 
Old 11-03-2005, 09:02 PM   #8
BarryGIS
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
Angry k8s-mx

The K8S-MX motherboard will not work with any Linux distribution. The problem lies in the SiS965 chipset which is the southbridge for this motherboard. Until someone in the Linux community is willing to update linux it will never happen. ASUS answer is that the motherboard is not supported with Linux, I learned this lesson to late. However, it is a great motherboard and Windows XP supports it fine. Save your time and efforts, just give up.

It is really bad that one must purchase old junk technology to get a system that is Linux compatible.
 
Old 11-04-2005, 10:55 AM   #9
lord_zoo
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 30

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
It really hurts to read that.



I hope someone fix this, so we all can use this motherboard.

Good Luck.
 
Old 11-04-2005, 11:25 AM   #10
RedShirt
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Denver
Distribution: Sabayon 3.5Loop2
Posts: 1,150

Rep: Reputation: 45
Quote:
It is really bad that one must purchase old junk technology to get a system that is Linux compatible.
What is really too bad is people using SiS chipsets. They are by far the lowest of the low, and no motherboard with a SiS is a good motherboard. You need to be looking essentially at only Intel chipsets for intel processors PERIOD. And for AMDs, you really should be getting nForce. It would also be best for secondaries to avoid via raid controllers and some other via parts, for sakes of speed and performance, it is best for you to stick with good parts. New parts, does not mean good parts. Good parts mean good parts. And you can get new good parts. If you want good spport and good parts, don't get SiS, from any manufacturer, it doesn't have the power or stability of other chipset makers.

ASUS used to be one of the best MB makers on the planet, but as any experienced tech will tell you, for the past few years, that just isn't so. Gigabyte and MSI really seem to constantly come out on top since the latter parts of the Athlon XP/P4 era.
 
Old 11-04-2005, 01:03 PM   #11
lord_zoo
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Posts: 30

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I agree with you on the chipset issue. I never liked SiS, but this time, I haven't other choice, since, as you could imagine, cost was the parameter to follow.
Of corse I would choose nVidia as chipset for "My" computer/server, since I'm happy with amd cpus. But this time, that wasn't a decision that I have taken.
Anyway, this would be good to have support on almost everything (I'm aware that this is some utopic thought, but well, nothing is lost by dreaming).

Maybe ASUS is following the way Soyo did a few years, since, as you know, Soyo was one of the best mb manufacter, but now, I think it's simple average.

Maybe, it's time for me to give MSI and Gigabyte a try.
 
Old 12-05-2005, 11:02 PM   #12
smcpolin
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
k8s-mx

I have one with the sempron 2800 and have the same problem - reboots loading the distro cd of FC3,FC4 - however it runs the FC3 that was already on the hdd [ I 'upgraded' the mb ]. It seems pretty reliable [ I'm using its video adapter and a PCI NIC ]; it bogs terribly if you burn a CD. I don't know if that is related.

If you have a junker around, try moving your drive to it, installing FCx, then move the drive to your shiny new machine....
 
Old 01-28-2006, 01:22 AM   #13
lotuseater01
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
asus k8smx mb and fc4

Hi. I faced the same problem. at boot prompt type ide=nodma.worked for me. I have a dual boot winxp and fc4.
Need help for configuring lan with adsl on this mb.:
 
Old 02-01-2006, 09:38 AM   #14
coolmohitz
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: India
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 7

Rep: Reputation: 0
For setting up LAN card you may refer my page at
http://www.cse.iitb.ac.in/~mohitz/tech/k8smx.php
 
Old 02-26-2006, 11:39 AM   #15
metro1000
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Spalding,UK
Distribution: Fedora Core 3/Puppylinux
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
Hi people,
Yes this really is an appalling board but i'm stuck with it for the time being, I have an ide HDD and have been trying to get FC4-64bit to go on it [FC3-32bit was OK] using "ide=nodma" and "noprobe" gets me to the point where it seems to have installed but on the first reboot it blobs out claiming to be unable to find/mount the partitions. using some other software shows that /boot [100mb] is type 83h linux but that the extended partition on the drive is type 8eh [unknown], using the utility to change the partition type has no effect [things are never that easy!]. I had a go putting FC5-b2 on but this boots from DVD, looks to be OK but then fails to write the install image to the drive claiming to have failed to mount the drive or some such thing. Anyone got any ideas? I think I'll give it one last go when FC5 comes out and if it won't have it i'll try a better board.Trouble is,thats the easy way out and there's not much fun in that!
Joe
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cant install Linux on SATA HDD Asus k8S MX combo coolmohitz Linux - Hardware 4 09-02-2005 09:24 AM
Fedora Core 4 in Asus A6Va magnosantos Linux - Laptop and Netbook 2 08-18-2005 04:49 PM
(FreeBSD && Fedora Core 4 && Slackware 10.0) Filesystem Support taylor_venable *BSD 1 07-14-2005 02:24 PM
Asus wlan for Fedora Core? shamgar03 Linux - Hardware 1 09-02-2004 03:03 AM
Fedora core 1 on Asus l5800c sbordo Fedora - Installation 0 02-24-2004 05:32 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 PM.

Main Menu
 
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration