LinuxQuestions.org
Support LQ: Use code LQ3 and save $3 on Domain Registration
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 05-31-2007, 03:03 PM   #1
Dudydoo
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: I use 'em all ;-)
Posts: 271

Rep: Reputation: 37
Xen performance compared to dual-boot


I usually dual-boot a few Linux distro's to try them out, and I was thinking of using Xen instead to make them easier to manage or run multiple OS's at once.

I was just wondering what the performance would be like, as with dual-booting you get the full speed of the system.

My CPU is an AMD Athlon XP 2000+ (1.67Ghz) with 1GB memory.

Please share you views. Thanks.
 
Old 05-31-2007, 04:06 PM   #2
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: back to Arch
Posts: 16,668

Rep: Reputation: 425Reputation: 425Reputation: 425Reputation: 425Reputation: 425
From what I have read, I gather that Xen is the fastest of the virtual machine setups---The catch being that the Kernel has to be compiled for Xen. This said, ANY virtual machine will be slower than the "direct" approach---the processor simply has more work to do.

Whether you will notice the difference depends on whether the application is CPU-intensive or I/O intensive. For example, I would expect no noticeable difference in web browsing.

What would a Google search show---eg using "virtual machine speed"?
 
Old 05-31-2007, 04:14 PM   #3
Dudydoo
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: I use 'em all ;-)
Posts: 271

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 37
I've already tried google, but no real definite answer. I just wanted to hear from the horses mouth so to speak.

I also forgot to mention in my first post was that I was mainly concerned about X GUI performance.

I am going to try it anyway, but I was just curious of people's experiences.
 
Old 05-31-2007, 04:22 PM   #4
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: back to Arch
Posts: 16,668

Rep: Reputation: 425Reputation: 425Reputation: 425Reputation: 425Reputation: 425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dudydoo
I've already tried google, but no real definite answer. I just wanted to hear from the horses mouth so to speak.
I don't qualify as a horse---more like a colt with 4 left feet...
Good decision to go ahead and try it....
 
Old 06-02-2007, 09:43 AM   #5
radii
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: May 2007
Posts: 3

Rep: Reputation: 0
Hi people it's my first time here, I'm sorry if this is the wrong thread. Can anyone please help me with information regarding the xen installation procedure. When I try to compile xen from source I get an error:

/home/radii/xen-3.1.0-src/linux-2.6.14.3-xen/arch/i386/Makefile:38: /home/radii/xen-3.1.0-src/linux-2.6.14.3-xen/arch/i386/Makefile.cpu: No such file or directory
make[5]: *** No rule to make target `/home/radii/xen-3.1.0-src/linux-2.6.14.3-xen/arch/i386/Makefile.cpu'. Stop.
make[4]: *** [oldconfig] Error 2
make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/radii/xen-3.1.0-src/linux-2.6.14.3-xen'
make[3]: *** [build-linux-2.6.14.3-xen_x86_32/include/linux/autoconf.h] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/radii/xen-3.1.0-src'
make[2]: *** [linux-2.6-xen-install] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/radii/xen-3.1.0-src'
make[1]: *** [install-kernels] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/radii/xen-3.1.0-src'
make: *** [world] Error 2

I use the command make world as described in the user guide.
 
Old 06-03-2007, 02:33 PM   #6
Dudydoo
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: I use 'em all ;-)
Posts: 271

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 37
Just a follow up if anyone is interested, I have installed Xen on a fresh install of Fedora 7 as the host and also as a guest.

It works really well, however, performance wise, in a console with no X running it is lightning fast (I suppose it would be :-) ) and using it as a server is good aswell, but using it with X and Gnome running, it is a bit too slow to be usable compared to dual-boot, for me anyway.

I am sure all this will improve in the future though, because I know they are working on GPU acceleration in VM's and the framebuffer driver that ships with Xen is much better than VMware used to be.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Managing Xen With Xen-Tools, Xen-Shell, And Argo LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 11-05-2006 12:21 PM
LXer: Managing Xen With Xen-Tools, Xen-Shell, And Argo LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-21-2006 11:33 PM
Slow performance as compared to Windows! pburn Mandriva 6 07-05-2006 11:13 AM
Slow performance with linux compared to winxp dangerousdave Linux - Newbie 16 08-22-2005 06:39 PM
XEN performance gravesb Suse/Novell 3 08-10-2005 04:37 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:42 AM.

Main Menu
 
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration