Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Distribution: Ubuntu, Currently Chained to Windows
Posts: 67
Rep:
which distro has a SIMPLE desktop interface?
I am looking for a distro with an extremely simple desktop interface. I am looking for something as simple as the iPad where you can only run 1 application and it gets maximized. You click an icon and... you get that. Also the hardware is well described as "Aging," it is not dual-core, and may be as low as 64mb of RAM.
This is because the computer will basically be used as a simple game machine, and by game I mean Minesweeper and Solitaire. For Multiplayer games maybe virtual board games on a single screen, no LAN type stuff. Also I do not want the primary users of this computer to be able to access anything besides exactly what I determine they are supposed to. Basically what we want is something that is Child-Safe and Child-Simple. There will be no internet browsing or document creation or anything complicated.
Now I am not saying however that there won't be a possible user login that does have access to a full complement of software programs, just that I need to be able to setup at least one login that meets the criteria I specified.
I have used Ubuntu in a few iterations, I can use a terminal with some internet help, and consider myself "Technical." Primarily I will be managing the software.
Check out BrowserLinux, SafePup, and TeenPup for examples of what's possible with customized Puppy. Or you can use the remastering tools to make your own Puplet customized for your exact needs.
If you install DVTM ( Dynamic Virtual Terminal Manager ) this will run in runlevel 3 ( no X ), allowing you to allocate several areas of your text framebuffer ( mine is 1280x1024 ) stacked as your preferences
Allowing you to run simultaneously a web browser like w3m or links, a source editor like fte, vim or nano, a math prototyping app like octave, scilab or maxima, an IRC client like irssi, an msn client like centerim, a file manafer like mc...
having 5 "windows" per TTY, copying and pasting between all them ...
Location: At the 100th Meridian where the great plains begin
Distribution: Debian Testing on T60 laptop
Posts: 105
Rep:
When I've installed Debian it's allowed me to skip installing a desktop at all. There's then a range of window managers (as opposed to desktop environments, although they have those as well) that you can install, all the way down to the simple tiling window managers and other virtually nonexistent ones. If you did it that way you'd probably have to use the package manager (apt-get or aptitude, the same used by Ubuntu I believe) from the command line: a matter of memorizing a few commands if you haven't memorized them yet.
Debian's what I have experience with so that's why it's the one that I mention. It should be possible to run most major distros with a light window manager and no other bells or whistles; although the default is to use something like KDE or Gnome. If you want a distro that's specifically designed to be very lightweight right off the bat, then I don't have experience with it myself although it definitely exists. Probably the Puppy ones that snowpine mentioned.
Tell us more about the computer (I assume it's not the one in your sig). 64MB of RAM is going to be a problem with almost any OS. Installing more RAM will make a huge difference.
64MB is really too low for a GUI. Puppy (which I can recommend) will run well in 128MB. Damn Small Linux is listed at Distrowatch as dormant, so that's not such a good idea.
Location: At the 100th Meridian where the great plains begin
Distribution: Debian Testing on T60 laptop
Posts: 105
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidMcCann
Damn Small Linux is listed at Distrowatch as dormant, so that's not such a good idea.
Thanks for pointing that out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pixellany
64MB of RAM is going to be a problem with almost any OS.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidMcCann
64MB is really too low for a GUI.
Here's a link (that's recently edited but probably first written about two years ago) that says Ubuntu can be set up to run on a system with 64 MB memory: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/In...wMemorySystems. That said, they don't say it will run well. They say to set aside plenty of swap space meaning it would probably run slowly. So I think it's agreed you might want more memory than that.
Also there's the question of what medium you'd use to install it. If the machine is that old, it might not read some of the CDs that we have these days.
Distribution: Ubuntu, Currently Chained to Windows
Posts: 67
Original Poster
Rep:
The computers were donated machines to an organization originally intended to be used for office work. Once I got asked to come in and assess them I saw the specs and Windows 2000 or Windows ME (can't remember exactly) and said flatly... you need new equipment. Then a grant was written for and machines and equipment were purchased to serve the role.
I am trying to do what I can to make use of them in the best possible manner, and save them from the landfill.
The computers were donated machines to an organization originally intended to be used for office work. Once I got asked to come in and assess them I saw the specs and Windows 2000 or Windows ME (can't remember exactly) and said flatly... you need new equipment. Then a grant was written for and machines and equipment were purchased to serve the role.
I am trying to do what I can to make use of them in the best possible manner, and save them from the landfill.
It really depends on the exact specs, so any details you provide can help us make a better recommendation. There is a huge difference in options between a 64mb, 128mb, 256mb ram, etc. when it comes to your choice of distros. I personally will not touch a computer with less than a Pentium 3 with 256mb of ram, and I believe even Puppy recommends 128mb+ these days.
Location: At the 100th Meridian where the great plains begin
Distribution: Debian Testing on T60 laptop
Posts: 105
Rep:
If you can still boot into Windows, then you should be able to find out how much memory and what kind of CPU the computers have without opening them up. There's a good chance that info will be available under Control Panel->System or something similar.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.