LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 05-05-2007, 10:19 AM   #1
Philosopher
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Distribution: Fedora 20
Posts: 101

Rep: Reputation: 15
Which architecture?


Hi all,

I have a question about some I think strange behaviour: When compiling a *.src.rpm the binary packages show up in /usr/src/rpm/RPMS/i586. Nothing strange about that so far. The strange aspect is, that uname says, the Athlon XP 1600+ belongs to i686 family (which I believe is corrcet).
Anybody, who can explain that to me?

Greets
 
Old 05-05-2007, 10:31 AM   #2
manwichmakesameal
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2006
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 800

Rep: Reputation: 100Reputation: 100
glibc

I may be wrong, but I think that has to do with the system that glibc was built for.
 
Old 05-05-2007, 08:36 PM   #3
Philosopher
Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Distribution: Fedora 20
Posts: 101

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Thanks for the reply. So, that brings us to the question: If I compile glibc on my machine, the binary shows up under i586 though itīs compiled on i686. If I install that fresh compiled glibc, where will the next packages compiled show up? Think I'm gonna try that out. I'll keep you informed!

Greets
 
Old 05-06-2007, 09:43 AM   #4
pixellany
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Distribution: Arch/XFCE
Posts: 17,802

Rep: Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728Reputation: 728
You get a package (rpm, source code, whatever) that is designed for a 586, and that is how it will be set up. It won't change the installation configuration because you are on a 686.

(SW for 586 will run on a 686, but not always the other way around)
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
which architecture? edgjerp Linux - Hardware 4 03-15-2006 08:32 PM
Architecture help LoserDude27 Suse/Novell 2 11-27-2005 03:19 AM
What architecture would I use? johnnyICON Linux - Newbie 1 12-08-2004 11:36 AM
Architecture skguha Linux - Newbie 2 05-03-2004 12:37 AM
Architecture TX_metalhead Linux - General 5 02-04-2002 04:13 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration