Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to
LinuxQuestions.org , a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free.
Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please
contact us . If you need to reset your password,
click here .
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
02-05-2003, 08:54 AM
#1
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2003
Posts: 7
Rep:
Very slow performance with RH8.0
I have installed 8.0 on PIII and the system became really slow when running anything on it...Such as I have wait second when I open terminal window..Seems like something slows down the whole system...any Idea..I am very new to RedHat...
02-05-2003, 09:23 AM
#2
Moderator
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Grenoble
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 9,408
Rep:
Open a terminal and run
top
It's a program that shows most processor and memory consuming programs. Please copy the list and paste it to the forum.
02-05-2003, 09:34 AM
#3
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2003
Posts: 7
Original Poster
Rep:
But I suspect the graphic card and driver...Because looks to me there is a lot of CPU idle time and the system is still slow...
5:35pm up 9 days, 3:28, 4 users, load average: 0.11, 0.45, 1.09
90 processes: 86 sleeping, 4 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: 11.4% user, 5.1% system, 0.0% nice, 83.3% idle
Mem: 61480K av, 59952K used, 1528K free, 0K shrd, 1124K buff
Swap: 522072K av, 61044K used, 461028K free 14512K cached
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
780 root 5 -10 46344 6796 5768 S < 6.3 11.0 31:42 X
15436 ozgurg 15 0 4364 3692 3400 S 3.5 6.0 0:35 metacity
19252 root 15 0 7640 5764 4152 S 1.9 9.3 0:07 python
15452 ozgurg 15 0 7688 6468 5592 S 1.7 10.5 0:34 gnome-panel
16325 ozgurg 15 0 6764 5128 4240 R 1.1 8.3 0:58 gnome-terminal
19699 root 15 0 1016 1016 772 R 0.7 1.6 0:00 top
15454 ozgurg 15 0 8488 3912 3488 S 0.1 6.3 0:11 nautilus
1 root 15 0 416 380 368 S 0.0 0.6 0:04 init
2 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:19 keventd
3 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 kapmd
4 root 34 19 0 0 0 SWN 0.0 0.0 0:00 ksoftirqd_CPU0
5 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:16 kswapd
6 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 bdflush
7 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 kupdated
8 root 25 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 mdrecoveryd
12 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 kjournald
63 root 16 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 khubd
158 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 kjournald
159 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 kjournald
160 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 kjournald
161 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 kjournald
162 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 kjournald
474 root 15 0 492 452 452 S 0.0 0.7 0:00 syslogd
478 root 15 0 376 328 328 S 0.0 0.5 0:00 klogd
487 rpc 15 0 468 432 432 S 0.0 0.7 0:00 portmap
506 rpcuser 16 0 472 388 388 S 0.0 0.6 0:00 rpc.statd
02-05-2003, 09:38 AM
#4
Moderator
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Grenoble
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 9,408
Rep:
It may be nautilus... But it may be a problem with a slow video driver. What card do you have?
02-05-2003, 10:03 AM
#5
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2003
Posts: 7
Original Poster
Rep:
What is nautilus?
It has an embedded VDA...the box is HP Vectra VE PIII...not sure what comes with this model...
02-05-2003, 10:13 AM
#6
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2003
Posts: 7
Original Poster
Rep:
Here is the TOP output...X eatsto much CPU...
0268 ozgurg 35 10 20276 3876 1972 R N 87.3 6.3 4:47 gltext
19699 root 15 0 872 828 620 R 0.9 1.3 0:20 top
780 root 5 -10 46008 6124 5100 S < 0.5 9.9 32:13 X
16325 ozgurg 15 0 7848 5388 4028 S 0.3 8.7 1:12 gnome-terminal
1 root 15 0 416 380 368 S 0.0 0.6 0:04 init
2 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:19 keventd
3 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 kapmd
4 root 34 19 0 0 0 SWN 0.0 0.0 0:00 ksoftirqd_CPU0
5 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:18 kswapd
6 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 bdflush
7 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 kupdated
8 root 25 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 mdrecoveryd
12 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 kjournald
63 root 16 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 khubd
158 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 kjournald
159 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 kjournald
160 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 kjournald
161 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 kjournald
162 root 15 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 kjournald
474 root 15 0 480 440 440 S 0.0 0.7 0:00 syslogd
02-06-2003, 02:39 PM
#7
Moderator
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Grenoble
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 9,408
Rep:
Nautilus is a nice looking file manager. The only problem is that it requires much RAM..
02-07-2003, 03:23 AM
#8
Member
Registered: May 2002
Location: Dalec, HU
Distribution: Redhat 7.3
Posts: 696
Rep:
you are definetely missing some more RAM, with 64Megs RH8 will be butt slow
02-08-2003, 01:44 AM
#10
LQ Newbie
Registered: Feb 2003
Posts: 7
Original Poster
Rep:
That was definetly RAM....I realized that very late...and increased it to 256M..and now it is eating all the memory but much much faster.....very reasonable speed....
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 PM .
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know .
Latest Threads
LQ News