LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 09-23-2014, 03:56 PM   #16
astrogeek
Moderator
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Distribution: Slackware [64]-X.{0|1|2|37|-current} ::12<=X<=15, FreeBSD_12{.0|.1}
Posts: 6,263
Blog Entries: 24

Rep: Reputation: 4194Reputation: 4194Reputation: 4194Reputation: 4194Reputation: 4194Reputation: 4194Reputation: 4194Reputation: 4194Reputation: 4194Reputation: 4194Reputation: 4194

Maybe we could just change the name of the best existing method to SysVinitd and stick with the proven winner? Sure would save wasting everyone's time chasing the biggest loser-d!
 
Old 09-23-2014, 05:45 PM   #17
jtsn
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2011
Posts: 922

Rep: Reputation: 480Reputation: 480Reputation: 480Reputation: 480Reputation: 480
Quote:
Originally Posted by randompie View Post
But, the question is "What are the subdirectories that one can continue to have on separate partitions to
be able to comply with the new diktat of One Big /usr?"
1) Not /usr any more
2) /home - thank God for that
/home is just a replacement for /usr, where the user directories resided (i. e. /usr/home), before they got moved to /home.

Quote:
3) /var - given the crap that goes into it package cache, mail spool putting it on a separate partition makes a ton of sense, but
wait! It has /var/log on it.
There are even setups, where /var/log is a separate partition mounted with different flags. And /tmp, of course.

Quote:
4) /boot - yes that is still possible
/boot is just a workaround for separating the boot files from a cluttered /, when / = /usr

Quote:
So, by adding /usr and /var - my / goes from < 100 MB to 16 GB+! Why can't we continue to have small binaries, possibly self-contained and statically linked in the old /bin and /sbin? I have still not understood the rationale of the Big /usr? Avoiding duplication?
AFAIK the "UsrMove" was a design decision to make the BSD jails copycat "docker" work. But I didn't look into the details and I'm not interested.
 
Old 09-25-2014, 07:04 PM   #18
szboardstretcher
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2006
Location: Detroit, MI
Distribution: GNU/Linux systemd
Posts: 4,278

Rep: Reputation: 1694Reputation: 1694Reputation: 1694Reputation: 1694Reputation: 1694Reputation: 1694Reputation: 1694Reputation: 1694Reputation: 1694Reputation: 1694Reputation: 1694
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReaperX7 View Post
Journald is dead.

They removed it out. You'll still need rsyslog, sysklogd, etc.
I don't see this mentioned anywhere official. Is it just one distro you are talking about? Or is it a rumor?

Have a link?
 
Old 09-25-2014, 08:48 PM   #19
ReaperX7
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2011
Location: California
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0 Multilib
Posts: 6,558
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097
http://uselessd.darknedgy.net/

Quote:
No journald. Consequently, this also means no libqrencode and libmicrohttpd integration, nor hooking coredumps to the journal. The default log target for auxiliaries is now LOG_TARGET_SYSLOG_OR_KMSG.

The main case against binary logs is their corruptibility. This happens more often than you’d think, due to not having any transaction consistency, as an RDBMS would. The advice of the systemd developers on handling this? Ignore it.

Otherwise, the main legitimate case for binary logs (but actually journald in particular) is Forward Secure Sealing. This is no longer a dealbreaker, since rsyslog supports log signing through GuardTime since 3.7.9 now. You can also use a combination of OpenSSL or the NSS signtool plus logrotate jobs to verify log authenticity, though this is more intricate.

Secondary concerns include /var/log/journal fragmentation (though this can be mitigated through the SystemMaxUse option in journald.conf and log rotation) and lack of a standard way to log to a database backend (though we speculate that some hacking with systemd-cat, FIFOs and shell script glue might do something similar, this has been untested and is rather fragile in theory).
The uselessd maintainer was able to remove the journald code completely from the codebase and after more stripping down the code, all he was left with was the bare bones init system, the part of the project that actually is the init system itself, no more, no less.

Last edited by ReaperX7; 09-25-2014 at 08:52 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-01-2014, 01:19 PM   #20
systemloc
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2014
Posts: 8

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Gradually, many bits and pieces of software that sit between the kernel and userspace are all hoovered up into one monolithic code block controlled by a single company. Because of the loss of all those various bits, there is only a single player that all other distros must adopt, as the alternative will no longer be developed or supported.

Now that's happened, a single company will be able to unilaterally dictate further GNU/linux development, or break other distros, maybe purposely, while advancing its own distro.

This is a clear "Embrace, extend, extinguish" strategy.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-07-2014, 05:49 PM   #21
jtsn
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2011
Posts: 922

Rep: Reputation: 480Reputation: 480Reputation: 480Reputation: 480Reputation: 480
Quote:
Originally Posted by systemloc View Post
This is a clear "Embrace, extend, extinguish" strategy.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/7/254
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 10-07-2014, 11:13 PM   #22
ReaperX7
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2011
Location: California
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0 Multilib
Posts: 6,558
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097Reputation: 2097
No more systemd-shim then.

Guess it's back to reviving ConsoleKit somehow...
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wireless not able to be brought up TheStarLion Arch 5 08-28-2011 02:39 AM
DHCP IP not being brought up vzxen Linux - Networking 5 06-06-2011 03:20 PM
New-subnet brought hell to me TAAN Fedora 1 02-25-2006 06:37 AM
Interface not brought up on booting !! OneManArmy Linux - Networking 2 04-08-2004 05:10 PM
iv just brought a camcorder master Linux - General 4 03-13-2004 12:11 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration