Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
06-01-2007, 06:51 PM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Southeast, U.S.A.
Distribution: Fedora (Desktop), CentOS (Server), Knoppix (Diags)
Posts: 934
Rep:
|
Updating vs. Upgrading your OS
I understand that it is not necessarily recommended to download a brand new OS version as soon as it comes out, due to bugs.
Technically speaking, what is the difference between my fully updated Fedora 6, and a new Fedora 7 install? I'm not really asking about the Fedora 6/7 example specifically. Rather, I am asking for a wholistic perspective.
|
|
|
|
06-01-2007, 06:58 PM
|
#2
|
|
Guru
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Somewhere on the String
Distribution: Debian Squeeze (x86)
Posts: 6,092
|
Well, I can only speak in Debian terms. In Debian, the stable branch receives updates that are just security updates. No newer version of a package is added to your system. An upgrade, however, would change all the packages to the newest packages in the repository.
For example, Sarge (oldstable) had a 2.6.8 kernel. A kernel update was from 2.6.8-2 to 2.6.8-3 (just security updates). But an upgrade is from Sarge to Etch (current stable) changes the kernel from 2.6.8-3 to 2.6.18-4. Similarly, all your packages will go to the newest version your distro has.
Does that answer the question (or did I answer the wrong question)?
|
|
|
|
06-01-2007, 08:30 PM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Southeast, U.S.A.
Distribution: Fedora (Desktop), CentOS (Server), Knoppix (Diags)
Posts: 934
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pljvaldez
Does that answer the question (or did I answer the wrong question)?
|
Yes, it does, at least from your standpoint. Is that standard practice on most well-known distros; updating only bugfixes and security patches within a single distro release?
|
|
|
|
06-01-2007, 09:00 PM
|
#4
|
|
Guru
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: Somewhere on the String
Distribution: Debian Squeeze (x86)
Posts: 6,092
|
I would assume so. A lot of times when a new version of a program comes out, it is probably written against the newest libraries available. So I would say that any programs that would require upgrading libraries are not upgraded. Some distros probably release newer versions of programs that can still be compiled against current libraries.
For example, Debian won't release k3b 1.0 on Etch (stable) just security updates to 0.13 (I think). But if possible, another distro, like openSuse, may compile k3b 1.0 against current libraries and then release that package. But I'm speculating...
|
|
|
|
06-01-2007, 09:08 PM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: Canada
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 702
Rep:
|
Gentoo does not use the concept of versions, as the entire system can be upgraded to the latest package releases ... including the kernel.
A Gentoo system that was installed 4 years ago can be simply upgraded to the most current system by a simple command:
Code:
# emerge --update --deep world
|
|
|
|
06-01-2007, 11:13 PM
|
#6
|
|
Guru
Registered: Nov 2006
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Ubuntu 11.04, Debian testing
Posts: 5,019
Rep: 
|
New Debian (Lenny) is actually the same as a perfectly up-to-date Etch - I have them side by side and I can't find any obvious differences (even the kernel is identical). The main, difference, of course is that Lenny will keep evolving whereas Etch has reached its final form.
Debian, too, by the way can be upgraded by using a simple command:
apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade
As for Fedora 7 at this time, the differences with Fedora Core 6 are minimal. It uses a 2.6.21 kernel (which FC6 may get as well before long); but most importantly it has merged the core and extras repos (which is why the "Core" part was dropped from its title).
Last edited by jay73; 06-01-2007 at 11:16 PM.
|
|
|
|
06-02-2007, 04:31 PM
|
#7
|
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Distribution: Mint
Posts: 6,642
Rep:
|
The release notes for Fedora 7 should highlight the significant differences between FC6 and Fedora 7
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:53 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|