Linux - GeneralThis forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
One of our machines is running Suse 10.0 and up till today was still ok.
Now it will not open Thunderbird, it just quit straight away. Run it from termminal and got
I read somewhere about the Style fault, but restored those to defaults, no effect.
Is there a way to start it in 'safe mode'? thinking it might be a theme that's caused it to crash, any other way to eleminate that?
Sorry to bother you, it was a rouge theme, Although it doesn't appear in the help screen you can start thunderbird in safe mode with -safe-mode option, then I disabled and removed the themes, works perfectly again.
Note to self, don't install themes !
What have you found by Googling the actual problem?
Quote:
Segmentation fault $AOSS $MOZ_PROGRAM
Have you already tried any of the many solutions to that problem found in a Google search? That's also a Mozilla issue, not specifically a Thunderbird issue (could happen in Firefox too).
What have you found by Googling the actual problem?Have you already tried any of the many solutions to that problem found in a Google search? That's also a Mozilla issue, not specifically a Thunderbird issue (could happen in Firefox too).
Hi weibullguy, well I actually found google to be quite unhelpful in finding a solution to my problem, found plenty of segfault posts by no solutions, I searched here and only found 1 other thread related to the issue which again solution never found.
Thankfully I back traced what I did, which was to apply a theme, restarted in safe mode, removed the theme and all was sweet again, but NOTHING told me to do that via search.
Maybe I didn't search for the right keywords, I tried "thunderbird seg fault suse 10", "thunderbird seg fault", "GTK_IS_WIDGET (widget)' failed" amongst other keywords all yeilded very poor results. Its ok telling people to use the search, but ya gota know what to search for first!
Anyway, like I said, I fixed the problem myself in the end.
Quote:
Originally Posted by weibullguy
2. AMD64 processor used with pure 64-bit and multilib builds...no, it's not a PITA and you don't need a chroot.
Oh and on a side note, I SO disagee with that, its a TOTAL PITA! having to use 2 browsers cos there are no 64bit plugins! just for starters, but that's another subject
you would have found pages of this problem (mostly with Firefox). Many of those were related to themes that, when changed, resolved the problem. You just didn't know what to Google. In any event, glad you fixed it.
If you use a standards-compliant distro, then x86_64 shouldn't be a PITA. Why use two browsers? Just use the 32-bit version if the plugins are important. Did you think the internet was going to be faster using a 64-bit browser?
"Pure" 64-bit is more of a PITA (not much more), but that's because x86_64 is a multilib architecture. Ergo, pure 64-bit is NOT standards-compliant. If you put 64-bit libraries in /lib, you won't have many problems as long as you build everything yourself. You will run into problems trying to use things like Acrobat Reader, precompiled Java, etc. The solution is simple, but your system is, technically, broken. The same is true if you have an x86_64 system and use a pure 32-bit distro.
If you had searched the actual error messageyou would have found pages of this problem (mostly with Firefox). Many of those were related to themes that, when changed, resolved the problem. You just didn't know what to Google. In any event, glad you fixed it.
If you use a standards-compliant distro, then x86_64 shouldn't be a PITA. Why use two browsers? Just use the 32-bit version if the plugins are important. Did you think the internet was going to be faster using a 64-bit browser?
"Pure" 64-bit is more of a PITA (not much more), but that's because x86_64 is a multilib architecture. Ergo, pure 64-bit is NOT standards-compliant. If you put 64-bit libraries in /lib, you won't have many problems as long as you build everything yourself. You will run into problems trying to use things like Acrobat Reader, precompiled Java, etc. The solution is simple, but your system is, technically, broken. The same is true if you have an x86_64 system and use a pure 32-bit distro.
Fair enough, I didn't know which part of the statement was the error message, thought the first bit was, where the ending related to the application, I did (incorrectly) ignore the firefox references thinking it related to a different app.
As for using 2 browsers, I can only print from the 64bit browser and the plugin's only work in the 32 bit one, I wouldn't mind if everything worked in one or the other, but this half and half thing is driving me
Hi weibullguy, well I actually found google to be quite unhelpful in finding a solution to my problem, found plenty of segfault posts by no solutions, I searched here and only found 1 other thread related to the issue which again solution never found.
Thankfully I back traced what I did, which was to apply a theme, restarted in safe mode, removed the theme and all was sweet again
It appears you can remove the libflashsupport package and it will fix this issue..
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.