Quote:
has recently had to adopt the means to resolve conflict between developers.
|
I disagree with that phrasing, no one has "had" to do anything.
I'm not sure if this is a positive change or not. Linux is not about delivering A+ customer service.
It's not about working as a team. In fact, from its roots linux has always been a incredibly selfish setup (I work on what I want, when I want).
The fact that it's free (freedom) doesn't contradict that.
Quote:
The sad reality is that the infighting among the Linux developer community goes back... way back.
|
Yes... it has... because conflicting ideas leads to infighting. How is this possibly a bad thing? It's obviously not efficient but who said that was a priority?
If you want a unified goal, with everyone smiling and working together to make the best product.. go work for Microsoft, or Apple.
Seriously. I like my developers with their own thoughts and their own personalities. Developers who can get credit for their work and work on what they want, when they want, how they want. I like tech support where people will get ticked off at you when you fail to use a search engine for a simple question. Endless debates about init systems. Diverging communities based on philosophical differences.
My priority is people who think, not people who get along.
Regulating how people may conduct themselves is a slippery slope to the depressing world of commercialized products and A+ customer support.
Just IMO..