Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
My PC is 1800 Mhz 40 GB hard drive split between Suse 9.1 and Win XP. 256 MB Ram. Suse 8.2 and 9.0 were fast but Suse 9.1 is so slow.
I upgraded from DVD and did a normal install. Any ideas.
Change to gentoo =), that's what I did. I am somehow joking, I used to have SuSE 9.0 and then upgraded to 9.1, but as you said it got slower and many things that worked under 9.0 did not worked on 9.1 anymore, so I switched to gentoo.
Complaining only that a system is "slow" is pretty vague, so it's hard to offer any meaningful suggestions without more information. However, are you sure you aren't running a lot of unnecessary services in the background that are eating up CPU cycles? Are there specific actions or tasks that you are trying to perform which take longer to complete? My point is that it's possible that any slowness you're seeing is a temporary condition which can be rectified with proper tweaking. If you can provide more details about exactly what is going on, it may be possible to fix this. Example: what are the results of top? Do you have any runaway processes? -- J.W.
J.W thanks for the help I will post the results of top next week.
Although looking at them in the past even when CPU was only 2% opening Konqueror or even a shell which was much slower than with 9.0 or 8.2.
For example with 9.0 or 8.2 opening a shell was instaneous but now it actually has the penguin type timer.
I'm having the same problems with Suse 9.1. There's no problem with CPU usage on mine, Suse just seems to suck an incredible amount of memory for system processes. I have 396mb of ram, but by the time Suse boots up and KDE starts, I'm left with a measly 20mb or so (glad there's tons of swap). I've already stopped a bunch of boot processes, anything that isn't critical, but there's still close to 80 processes running at a fresh boot and I'm sure they aren't all necessary...
Even so, I can still compile, surf the web, listen to music, and burn a CD at the same time without a lick of trouble. The only big problem I have with Suse is when I have about 10 network connections running at once, things get really muddy. For some reason, I can kick the crap out of Mandrake or Slackware with tons of open connections, and have no problem at all. *shrugs*......I swear, the penguin icon on this website alone probably takes up 40 megs....bastards.
Would it be wise to change the value of this option if only using Suse as a desktop environment? I don't like seeing the words "death" and "system" in the same sentace. =(
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.