Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I've been trying to setup my system with software raid1 using the "missing disk" method and I've run into problems. I've read all the howto's that I could find and I "should" be able to accomplish this, but I'm stuck right now...
First of all, I did a base install of Sid from a daily image which went fairly well. My hopes are to have a system where I can simply do an "apt-get install kernel-image-something" to upgrade my system. After installing the base system, I installed a few packages with apt to get things set up and then I immediately did an "apt-get install kernel-image-2.6.7-1-k7-smp" (to replace my base install 2.6.6-1-386 kernel) which went without errors, I checked to be sure lilo.conf had been setup correctly and rebooted and everything was fine. I then modified my /etc/modules and my /etc/mkinitrd/modules to include the following:
I then created a new initrd.img with mkinitrd, ran lilo and rebooted. Here is the relevant portion of dmesg:
RAMDISK: cramfs filesystem found at block 0
RAMDISK: Loading 4588 blocks [1 disk] into ram disk...
VFS: Mounted root (cramfs filesystem) readonly.
Freeing unused kernel memory: 168k freed
SCSI subsystem initialized
md: md driver 0.90.0 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MD_SB_DISKS=27
md: raid0 personality registered as nr 2
md: raid1 personality registered as nr 3
raid5: measuring checksumming speed
8regs : 2076.000 MB/sec
8regs_prefetch: 2132.000 MB/sec
32regs : 1616.000 MB/sec
32regs_prefetch: 1464.000 MB/sec
pIII_sse : 4164.000 MB/sec
pII_mmx : 4152.000 MB/sec
p5_mmx : 5564.000 MB/sec
raid5: using function: pIII_sse (4164.000 MB/sec)
md: raid5 personality registered as nr 4
This is all loading "before" the drivers for my scsi adapters and everything appears to be "working". "uname -r" shows I am running the new kernel and cat /proc/mdstat shows:
and so forth for all of my partitions. Everything goes fine (except for errors showing the the "device contains an ext2 fs... I've repartitioned and it still comes up that way). A cat /proc/mdstat shows the raid personalities AND the raid array with all of the devices.
I reboot and the array is gone!!! A cat /proc/mdstat shows:
What am I missing??? I've repartitioned the drive several times, I've made sure that the partitions are all set to "raid autodetect" or "fd" and fdisk -l shows everything is fine. I've run "mdadm --zero-superblock" on each of the block devices prior to "creating" the array...
Others have seemingly been able to setup software raid1 with modules rather than compiled into the kernel, but I've obviously missed something???