Linux - GeneralThis Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
i recently installed red hat 8.0 on my pc and have decided on a dual boot config. with w2k
The installation is fine and everything works well, except that the booting up of w2k has become really slow, i mean a noticeable big difference. I tried looking for information on this but have found nothing that works for me.
Heard that the problem is due to the linux partitions and how w2k takes time to figure out what these partitions are.
i have 2 HD (1) with w2k installation (2) linux partitions with 1 fat32 shared partition and 1 ntsf partition for w2k archive
You wrote: i have 2 HD (1) with w2k installation (2) linux partitions with 1 fat32 shared partition and 1 ntsf partition for w2k archive
Do you have a Linux partition between two that Windows would understand? If I'm reading this correctly, your second drive has two or more Linux partions, physically followed by a FAT32 partition and an NTFS partition.
If this is the case, you have presented Windows with a problem it has a great deal of difficulty dealing with, because it doesn't understand anything but its formats. See my other dissertaion on a bridge over a river that now has a section missing.
To fix this, reconfigure your partitions. If you are giving Linux the beginning of the second drive, only have non-Windows formats on it.
Option #1 is to put the shared partitions at the end of disk #1 and dedicate disk #2 to Linux. If that isn't feasible, try Option #2.
Reinstall Linux (I'll get hate mail for this!) and change the order you put the second disk's partitions in. Put the Windows-compatible ones up front and the Linux ones at the back. This way our finicky Windows operating system encounters all of its known universe without holes.
This should get Windows back to its normal stodgy pace.
solution to slow win2k with dual linux without fdisk shennanigins ( post #8)
Had the exact same problem, huge delays in win2k boot/startup.
Using win2k/linux (RH7.3) dual boot, with the two OS's on different HDDs. Noticed that the linux drive was listed in the device manager of win2k (control panel->system->hardware tab->device manager) under "disk drives". Right-click the linux drive, select disable, and BAAM! - the system boots like it ain't five years ago.