LinuxQuestions.org
View the Most Wanted LQ Wiki articles.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 10-29-2002, 02:43 AM   #1
teddy77
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Distribution: Redhat 8.0, Knoppix 3.1
Posts: 7

Rep: Reputation: 0
Slow booting of w2k after redhat 8 installation


i recently installed red hat 8.0 on my pc and have decided on a dual boot config. with w2k

The installation is fine and everything works well, except that the booting up of w2k has become really slow, i mean a noticeable big difference. I tried looking for information on this but have found nothing that works for me.

Heard that the problem is due to the linux partitions and how w2k takes time to figure out what these partitions are.

i have 2 HD (1) with w2k installation (2) linux partitions with 1 fat32 shared partition and 1 ntsf partition for w2k archive

any help will be much appreciated
 
Old 10-29-2002, 07:08 PM   #2
deadbug
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Distribution: MDK 8.0, 9.0; RH 7.2, 8.0, 9.0, FC3, FC4, FC5
Posts: 355

Rep: Reputation: 30
You wrote: i have 2 HD (1) with w2k installation (2) linux partitions with 1 fat32 shared partition and 1 ntsf partition for w2k archive

Do you have a Linux partition between two that Windows would understand? If I'm reading this correctly, your second drive has two or more Linux partions, physically followed by a FAT32 partition and an NTFS partition.

If this is the case, you have presented Windows with a problem it has a great deal of difficulty dealing with, because it doesn't understand anything but its formats. See my other dissertaion on a bridge over a river that now has a section missing.

To fix this, reconfigure your partitions. If you are giving Linux the beginning of the second drive, only have non-Windows formats on it.

Option #1 is to put the shared partitions at the end of disk #1 and dedicate disk #2 to Linux. If that isn't feasible, try Option #2.

Reinstall Linux (I'll get hate mail for this!) and change the order you put the second disk's partitions in. Put the Windows-compatible ones up front and the Linux ones at the back. This way our finicky Windows operating system encounters all of its known universe without holes.

This should get Windows back to its normal stodgy pace.
 
Old 10-30-2002, 09:07 PM   #3
teddy77
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Distribution: Redhat 8.0, Knoppix 3.1
Posts: 7

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
but i though that the linux partitions have to be in the first 1024 of the hard drive? is this true?
 
Old 10-30-2002, 09:55 PM   #4
MasterC
Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, UT - USA
Distribution: Gentoo ; LFS ; Kubuntu
Posts: 12,612

Rep: Reputation: 64
Nope...



This might have been true of the boot loader back in the day, but now Linux is as versatile as it gets.

Cool
 
Old 10-30-2002, 10:03 PM   #5
newpenguin
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: lahore pakistan
Distribution: slackware,redhat, FreeBSD,openbsd
Posts: 219

Rep: Reputation: 30
the search function is great.
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...ght=slow+win2k

and a person suggested there

solution to slow win2k with dual linux without fdisk shennanigins ( post #8)

Hey,

Had the exact same problem, huge delays in win2k boot/startup.
Using win2k/linux (RH7.3) dual boot, with the two OS's on different HDDs. Noticed that the linux drive was listed in the device manager of win2k (control panel->system->hardware tab->device manager) under "disk drives". Right-click the linux drive, select disable, and BAAM! - the system boots like it ain't five years ago.

Hope this helps,
Ryan
 
Old 11-01-2002, 01:06 PM   #6
teddy77
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Distribution: Redhat 8.0, Knoppix 3.1
Posts: 7

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 0
thanks guys, problem fixed
Used deadbug's option 2 and everything worked nicely
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Booting Slack 9.1 with W2K ? wardialer Slackware - Installation 1 10-19-2004 08:36 AM
Redhat 9.0 or Fedora Installation Disk burned from Windows XP not booting gardgreg Linux - Newbie 5 01-29-2004 11:09 AM
RH8 vs. W2k - Slow, slow, slow zerojosh Linux - Software 2 06-30-2003 08:19 PM
Redhat 7.3 Problems Installation/Booting Ascii Linux - Distributions 7 11-01-2002 08:14 AM
W2K and RH72 - kernel panic, need help with booting ... rstnkc Linux - Software 1 03-16-2002 12:17 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration