LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 10-27-2003, 12:21 PM   #1
zstingx
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Posts: 21

Rep: Reputation: 15
rpm i386,i686, and noarch on RH9


Hello ,
I have redhat 9 on intel pentium-4 processor.
I saw that some of my rpm are i386, some are i686 , and some ar eof
noarch format.

(I can know the type of rpm by rpm -queryformat ...).

Can someone explain what is the meaning of these formats?

If I go to an rpmfind.net and see rpm with i686 and with i386 extension,
which I should chose? (If I am not wrong it did happened to me twice or more, even though most
of the time there is only i368 *OR* i686 *OR* noarch (or something else)
version for one OS version (in this case, RH9).
regards,
sting
 
Old 10-27-2003, 12:35 PM   #2
Robert0380
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Atlanta
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 1,280

Rep: Reputation: 47
its about how the binary was compiled i think.

when you compile programs you can use the -mcpu=ix86 option (or -march=ix86)

if you compile with -march=i686, the code wont run on a 386 processor becuause of some code differences. i686 would be best (i think) because better instructions exsist in 686 than in 386 so i guess theoretically, the i686 code would run faster on an i686 machine and the i686 code wont run on a i386 machine.

that being said, my GUESS is that the noarch means it was compiled without the -march option used. This is my GUESS.


get i686 because u have a p4, i386 stuff might run slower, but any of them should work on your system, so if u cant get your hands on i686 rpms, just about any x86 version will work for you.
 
Old 10-27-2003, 02:10 PM   #3
Wynd
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2001
Distribution: Slackware 12
Posts: 511

Rep: Reputation: 32
I think noarch means the architecture doesn't matter, like in the case of man pages or fonts or some other non-executable package.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
is it ok to use i386 rpm for i686 & how about src rpm amolgupta Linux - Software 4 05-01-2013 08:45 AM
Are i386 & i686 rpm compatibles? smau Red Hat 1 03-07-2004 06:04 AM
which RPM do I want? i386 or i686? onlinejb Linux - Software 2 01-17-2004 07:36 PM
rpm handling of i386 and i686 packages wdingus Linux - Distributions 3 07-27-2003 03:16 PM
.src.rpm, .i386.rpm and .i686.rpm hhegab Linux - Software 2 06-19-2003 07:19 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration