Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.


  Search this Thread
Old 06-07-2012, 01:31 AM   #1
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jun 2011
Posts: 13

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Replacing init

I'm not even sure if this is possible but can you replace init with systemd? Basically my goal is to get systemd working on an install of slackware.
Old 06-07-2012, 01:57 AM   #2
LQ Veteran
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Australia
Distribution: Lots ...
Posts: 13,628

Rep: Reputation: 1393Reputation: 1393Reputation: 1393Reputation: 1393Reputation: 1393Reputation: 1393Reputation: 1393Reputation: 1393Reputation: 1393Reputation: 1393
Systemd is a replacement for the classic init, and runs as pid 1.
I'd doubt it's a "drop-in" replacement (with no other customization), but I've never looked.
Old 06-07-2012, 02:52 AM   #3
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Melbourne
Distribution: Slackware-current
Posts: 4,044

Rep: Reputation: 1115Reputation: 1115Reputation: 1115Reputation: 1115Reputation: 1115Reputation: 1115Reputation: 1115Reputation: 1115Reputation: 1115
It has been done. although the README link in appears to be dead. A request via IRC at ##slackware on might get you access to the information.
Old 06-07-2012, 06:48 PM   #4
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jun 2011
Posts: 13

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Just knowing it is possible is good enough for me.
Old 06-08-2012, 10:33 AM   #5
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Midwest USA, Central Illinois
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 12,028
Blog Entries: 16

Rep: Reputation: 1681Reputation: 1681Reputation: 1681Reputation: 1681Reputation: 1681Reputation: 1681Reputation: 1681Reputation: 1681Reputation: 1681Reputation: 1681Reputation: 1681
Member response


PV interview;
LQ) Right now, there are a number of potentially intrusive technical changes coming to some of the major distributions. How do you feel some of these will impact Linux in general and Slackware specifically? Are there any you would considering merging into Slackware? (55020 & tuxrules)

volkerdi) Yeah, I see a few things coming down the line that may cause a shakeup to our usual way of doing things, and could force Slackware to become, well, perhaps less UNIX-like. I guess the two big ones that are on the horizon are Wayland and systemd. Whether we end up using them or not remains to be seen. It's quite possible that we won't end up having a choice in the matter depending on how development that's out of our hands goes. It's hard to say whether moving to these technologies would be a good thing for Slackware overall. Concerning systemd, I do like the idea of a faster boot time (obviously), but I also like controlling the startup of the system with shell scripts that are readable, and I'm guessing that's what most Slackware users prefer too. I don't spend all day rebooting my machine, and having looked at systemd config files it seems to me a very foreign way of controlling a system to me, and attempting to control services, sockets, devices, mounts, etc., all within one daemon flies in the face of the UNIX concept of doing one thing and doing it well. To the typical end user, if this results in a faster boot then mission accomplished. With udev being phased out in favor of systemd performing those tasks we'll have to make the decision at some point between whether we want to try to maintain udev ourselves, have systemd replace just udev's functions, or if we want the whole kit and caboodle. Wayland, by comparison, seems fairly innocuous, assuming that they'll be able to implement network transparency either directly or through some kind of add-on compatibility layer. Again, another thing that most desktop users don't have a lot of use for but many users can't do without. I like X11, and would probably stick with it if moving to Wayland meant losing that feature, even if Wayland's rendering method carried with it some benefits like reduced rendering artifacts or increased video performance. I guess we'll just have to see what the overall benefit is when it's far enough along to make such comparisons.
Old 07-12-2012, 12:07 PM   #6
Registered: Jun 2006
Location: dartmouth, nova scotia
Distribution: slackware 12.1
Posts: 74

Rep: Reputation: 2
yah, i'm using xming to ssh into slackware, if there's a way to put wayland on windows to do the same thing, i'd stick my thumbs up. i've been looking into d-bus to get an audio player on linux, to play through windows... maybe wayland would help with that too...


init, slackware 13.37

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What is the exact diff between init 1,init S and init s challavijay Linux - Newbie 1 08-05-2010 07:51 AM
/sbin/init: Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! jalejo08 Linux - Kernel 7 07-02-2009 02:16 PM
LXer: Replacing init with Upstart LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 10-04-2006 09:21 PM
Kernal Panic: No init found. Try passing init= option to kernel raees Linux - General 12 03-19-2004 12:10 AM
error "Kernel panic: No init found. Try passing init= option Anauj0101 Linux - Newbie 3 05-06-2003 11:18 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 AM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration