LinuxQuestions.org
LinuxAnswers - the LQ Linux tutorial section.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 06-12-2005, 12:08 AM   #1
lennysokol
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Posts: 65

Rep: Reputation: 16
Read and Write to Ext3 Filesystem from Windows onto Linux


Linux Community,

I am a newbie who is running a dual boot laptop, and was wondering if there was anyway I could read my Linux file system from Windows. Presently, I can read my FAT32 from Linux.

Is there any program I can install under Windows that would allow me to read and write to my /, safely -- and is free of charge?

My "/" file system is ext3.

Suggestions and/or installation help would be wonderful!

Thanks for the help.
 
Old 06-12-2005, 12:20 AM   #2
musicman_ace
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2001
Location: Indiana
Distribution: Gentoo, Debian, RHEL, Slack
Posts: 1,555

Rep: Reputation: 46
http://uranus.it.swin.edu.au/~jn/linux/explore2fs.htm

first result when you google it
 
Old 06-12-2005, 12:27 AM   #3
joeljkp
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 41

Rep: Reputation: 15
Yeah, Explore2fs is a great program, I use it all the time. It can't write to ext3 though. I think there's an ext3 Windows driver project that can do that, but I haven't had much luck with it.
 
Old 06-12-2005, 05:24 AM   #4
Simon Bridge
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Waiheke NZ
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,211

Rep: Reputation: 197Reputation: 197
There is...

http://www.tuningsoft.com/projects/projects.htm#ext2fsd

Download from...

http://osdn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourc...t2fsd-0.10.zip

But really - why would you want to: isn't windows crap?
 
Old 06-12-2005, 06:30 AM   #5
musicman_ace
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2001
Location: Indiana
Distribution: Gentoo, Debian, RHEL, Slack
Posts: 1,555

Rep: Reputation: 46
Nevermind, wrong thread

Last edited by musicman_ace; 06-12-2005 at 06:31 AM.
 
Old 06-12-2005, 11:22 AM   #6
joeljkp
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 41

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
But really - why would you want to: isn't windows crap? [/B]
Because if you have to use it, you want to be able to access your files on Linux, perhaps.
 
Old 06-24-2005, 07:53 AM   #7
nasko
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
It seems that this ext2fsd is not present on sourceforge server or it gives a very strange error. Can anyone send it to me on thenasko@gmail.com he/she has it.
 
Old 06-26-2005, 03:27 AM   #8
Simon Bridge
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Waiheke NZ
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,211

Rep: Reputation: 197Reputation: 197
Go to www.sourceforge.net and search for ext2fsd - this will get you the latest version and lots of documentation.

I've sent the package off - so noone else need do so.

correction: I tried to send the package - but failed. Transcript of the session is as follows:
Quote:
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

thenasko@gmail.com
SMTP error from remote mailer after end of data:
host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [64.233.163.114]:
552 5.7.0 Illegal Attachment r9si4430722nza
It says it couldn't virus scan the attachment. Sorry, you'll have to go get this yourself.

Last edited by Simon Bridge; 06-26-2005 at 03:43 AM.
 
Old 06-28-2005, 06:40 AM   #9
flyashi
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
Hello,

I am also trying to read/write to my Ext3 partition from Windows XP SP2.

I need to read AND write to my Ext3, which only ext2fsd can do. However, i've not had much luck with it.

From my understanding, ext2fsd is started using the "net start ext2fsd" command. That works fine for me. Then, according mount.exe, I type in "mount 0 6 l:" which mounts the first hard drive's 6th partition to the L: (for Linux :) drive. It claims success, but Windows can't read/write to it.

Any ideas?

- Flyashi


P.S. The only reason I use windows is because there's more programs written for it. And, i'm not very experienced with linux yet; i'm just more comfortable with Windows. Also, under KDE, the best driver for my video chipset (SiS) still isn't as smooth as the Windows driver for it. So it's easier on the eyes. I hate to say it, but Windows is more user-friendly, and better for "simple" tasks, if not more reliable.
P.P.S. Let's not make this a big windows vs linux debate. I'm sure there are other threads for that.
 
Old 06-28-2005, 06:42 AM   #10
flyashi
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
Haha, nevermind, i got it.

Although, in linux, it's /dev/hda6, it mounts perfectly (I haven't tested write yet) as mount 0 3 l: . Who would've guessed?

- me
 
Old 06-28-2005, 06:52 AM   #11
Simon Bridge
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Waiheke NZ
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,211

Rep: Reputation: 197Reputation: 197
Lemme guess - it's the fourth ext3 partition?

hda1=WinXP (ntfs)
hda2=boot
hda3=swap
hda3=root (ext3 0)
hda4= (ext3 1)
hda5= (ext3 2)
hda6= (ext3 3) !bingo!
 
Old 06-28-2005, 07:41 AM   #12
flyashi
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jun 2005
Posts: 5

Rep: Reputation: 0
Quote:
Originally posted by Simon Bridge
Lemme guess - it's the fourth ext3 partition?

hda1=WinXP (ntfs)
hda2=boot
hda3=swap
hda3=root (ext3 0)
hda4= (ext3 1)
hda5= (ext3 2)
hda6= (ext3 3) !bingo!
.. i don't think so....

from what I gather:

/dev/hda1 is WinXP
/dev/hda2 begins extended
/dev/hda3 is (going to be ntfs, currently) unformatted
/dev/hda4 is i have no clue
/dev/hda5 beats me
/dev/hda6 is ext3
/dev/hda7 is linux swap
/dev/hda8 is an ntfs intermediary i set up after i got captive-ntfs working, so that I don't have to mount windows as writeable (just in case **it happens)

My first idea was: if hard drives are zero-indexed, maybe partitions are too. So I did mount 0 5 and I got /dev/hda8. I tried all the others, and mount 0 3 got /dev/hda6. I guess it is the third real partition ( 1 is winxp, 2 is unformatted, 3 is ext3), so I guess it kinda makes sense....

A lot of (not very computer-literate) people complain that "computer are so hard to use..." I never thought that way, but if you get into the nitty-gritty details (like hard drive partitions) then I guess they have a point. But... how many non-computer literate people would actually bother with hard drive partitions? Just me
 
Old 06-28-2005, 08:43 AM   #13
Simon Bridge
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Waiheke NZ
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,211

Rep: Reputation: 197Reputation: 197
/dev/hda1 is WinXP................................0
/dev/hda2 begins extended..................n/a (virtual - no fs)
/dev/hda3 is unformatted.......................n/a (no fs)
/dev/hda4 is i have no clue...................1
/dev/hda5 beats me................................2
/dev/hda6 is ext3.....................................3
/dev/hda7 is linux swap.........................4
/dev/hda8 is an ntfs ...............................5

everything with a fs written to it gets a number starting at zero? Mounting the swap partition would be fun <nudge nudge> or recursively mounting winXP (0 0)?
 
Old 07-03-2005, 01:47 PM   #14
xmb
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Posts: 6

Rep: Reputation: 0
It starts at one ( 1 ) btw.

Im searching too atm, got 30 mins.. in the german magazine called c't there was recently a review of a driver & config that should mount it r/w easily.. but not much luck finding it online.
 
Old 07-03-2005, 02:00 PM   #15
aysiu
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2005
Distribution: Ubuntu with IceWM
Posts: 1,776

Rep: Reputation: 66
Quote:
Originally posted by joeljkp
Because if you have to use it, you want to be able to access your files on Linux, perhaps.
Then, put all your shared files in the FAT32 partition. Save EXT3 for the programs and kernel. Save NTFS for the programs and Windows system. All files shared between OSes should be in FAT32.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fsck.ext3: Attempt to read block from filesystem trouble dolphans1 Mandriva 12 10-07-2009 04:30 AM
convert read only filesystem to write?... snip128 Linux - General 3 10-06-2004 08:06 PM
Read/Write access ext3 partition st00 *BSD 5 06-28-2004 08:46 PM
Cant write or read ext3 partitions?!?!?! wasabi Linux - General 9 06-17-2004 07:07 AM
how do I change the filesystem from read-only to read-write? les_chow Linux - Newbie 5 05-26-2004 03:14 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:05 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration