LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General
User Name
Password
Linux - General This Linux forum is for general Linux questions and discussion.
If it is Linux Related and doesn't seem to fit in any other forum then this is the place.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 05-24-2006, 03:23 PM   #1
Michael_aust
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Lancashire (United Kingdom)
Distribution: Debian Etch, on 686 machine.
Posts: 509

Rep: Reputation: 31
Question about LAME, Non technical question


I have a quick question. I am attempting to run my system with as little propriatory software as possable. At present I am only using the nvidia drivers and a few games e.e. ET, UT2004.

My qustion is, I understand many distributions choose not to distribute the LAME package directly in the distribution because of reasons to do with patents and the DMCA and things. Now my questions, is LAME Free Software, or is it propriatory? I know LAME has a sourceforge page, but is it entirly free software orare there non gpl components within it?

My second question is in regards to the mplayer w32 codecs packages. Are these free software? Were the codecs reverse engineered in order to provide the codec support or again do they contain non GPL code?

I hope someone can clariffy this for me.

Thanks in advance

Michael.
 
Old 05-24-2006, 03:55 PM   #2
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417

Rep: Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985
as lame.sf.net states, it is now fully compliant with the LGPL http://lame.sourceforge.net/about.html

mplayers w32codecs themselves are not reverse engineered, as they are just the orignal windows dll files and nothing more. as they are the original dlls they are still legally subject to the original vendors license terms, most of which are being somehwat violated in their use.
 
Old 05-24-2006, 04:03 PM   #3
Michael_aust
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Lancashire (United Kingdom)
Distribution: Debian Etch, on 686 machine.
Posts: 509

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 31
what about vlc? Is this entirly Free Software or is its support for the same as mplayer?
 
Old 05-25-2006, 01:48 AM   #4
acid_kewpie
Moderator
 
Registered: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Distribution: Gentoo, RHEL, Fedora, Centos
Posts: 43,417

Rep: Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985Reputation: 1985
why not just look at their homepage?? LQ.org is not a human search engine.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
connecting to X using Cygwin : Concept Question, not technical linuxquestions.fructose Linux - Software 0 08-28-2004 03:43 PM
a non technical question dowski Linux - General 11 03-14-2004 08:53 AM
Soundblasterlive 5.1 technical question CamelofCamelot Linux - Hardware 3 12-21-2003 09:51 PM
really lame question cclavey Slackware 3 04-07-2003 05:21 PM
Not really a technical question. Ciccio General 21 12-06-2002 08:41 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - General

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration