LinuxQuestions.org - problem in installing wxGTK-2.6.2 on fedora 4

- Linux - General (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/)

- - problem in installing wxGTK-2.6.2 on fedora 4 (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/problem-in-installing-wxgtk-2-6-2-on-fedora-4-a-417597/)

problem in installing wxGTK-2.6.2 on fedora 4

I want to install wxGTK-2.6.2 on my fc4 machine.
I follow all instructions in INSTALL.txt and everything looks nice.
But at the end when I use /sbin/ldconfig i get the following messages:

Code:

/sbin/ldconfig

/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2ud_html-2.6.so.0 is not a symbolic link



/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libwx_base-2.6.so.0 is not a symbolic link



/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2ud_adv-2.6.so.0 is not a symbolic link



/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2_media-2.6.so.0 is not a symbolic link



/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libwx_baseud_net-2.6.so.0 is not a symbolic link



/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2_html-2.6.so.0 is not a symbolic link



/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2ud_xrc-2.6.so.0 is not a symbolic link



/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2_qa-2.6.so.0 is not a symbolic link



/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2ud_qa-2.6.so.0 is not a symbolic link



/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2ud_media-2.6.so.0 is not a symbolic link



/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libwx_base_net-2.6.so.0 is not a symbolic link



/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libwx_baseud_xml-2.6.so.0 is not a symbolic link



/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libwx_baseud-2.6.so.0 is not a symbolic link



/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2_core-2.6.so.0 is not a symbolic link



/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2ud_core-2.6.so.0 is not a symbolic link



/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2_adv-2.6.so.0 is not a symbolic link



/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2_xrc-2.6.so.0 is not a symbolic link



/sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/libwx_base_xml-2.6.so.0 is not a symbolic link

Then when I try to install amule i get the following error:

Code:

rpm -ihv amule_2.0.0-0.rc8.3.1.fc3.fr_i386.rpm

warning: amule_2.0.0-0.rc8.3.1.fc3.fr_i386.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID e42d547b

error: Failed dependencies:

        libcrypto.so.4 is needed by amule-2.0.0-0.rc8.3.1.fc3.fr.i386

        libssl.so.4 is needed by amule-2.0.0-0.rc8.3.1.fc3.fr.i386

I even try to install aMule using Synaptic but I get the following error:

Code:

APT system reports:

E: Unknown signature /var/cache/apt/archives/amule_2.0.2-0.lvn.1.4_i386.rpm: (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#a109b1ec) 

E: Error(s) while checking package signatures:

0 unsigned package(s)

1 package(s) with unknown signatures

0 package(s) with illegal/corrupted signatures

anyone had such problem?

Use the wxGTK-2.6.2 rpm packages from freshrpms;
http://stentz.freshrpms.net/rpm.html?id=703

E: Unknown signature /var/cache/apt/archives/amule_2.0.2-0.lvn.1.4_i386.rpm

And the amule rpm from freshrpms also;

http://stentz.freshrpms.net/rpm.html?id=871

Don't forget to import the freshrpms key;

rpm --import http://svn.rpmforge.net/svn/branches...-KEY.freshrpms

is there any difference between these RPM files and others in other sites like sourceforge.net?

You mean like;

Changelog for wxGTK-2.6.2-0.2.2.fc4.src.rpm
* Wed Nov 30 2005 Matthias Saou <http://freshrpms.net/> 2.6.2-0.2

- Include wxGTK-2.6.2-intl.patch to fix reported crashes with aMule.

* Wed Oct 05 2005 Toshio Kuratomi <toshio-tiki-lounge.com> - 2.6.2-0.1

- Update to 2.6.2.
- Include the sample wx bakefiles.
- Include new .mo files.
- From Paul Johnson:
Change license to wxWidgets due to concerns over trademark infringement.
Add dist tag.
- From Tom Callaway: Build and include libwx_gtk2u_animate-2.6.

Changelog for amule-2.1.0-1.2.fc4.src.rpm

* Mon Jan 09 2006 Matthias Saou <http://freshrpms.net/> 2.1.0-1

- Update to 2.1.0.
- Add flex build requirement (optional, and FC4's version it too old anyway).
- Clean up no longer needed build requirements (many!).

These rpms are built for FC4 and the differences (if any) are from the packagers of the rpms, check the change logs of the rpms in question.