Hi again, YES i know that patching the kernel has been written about in depth around the forums, but there are so many different ideas about how one should patch the kernel.
In this instance I am working with Debian and have just installed the 2.6.23 kernel.
I would like to patch it for one reason - to learn how it works!!
Now the latest stable kernel is 2.6.24 as I write this. I can if I want download and install the latest without patching.
(Please don't forget this is a learning exercise and not of being worried that I might break something)
I would like to add the patches after 2.6.23 up to 2.16.24 If I have understood correctly I can't patch after 2.6.23.9 because that is a new version of the kernel.
So for arguments sake I want to apply the patches 1-9. I know they have to be installed consecutively otherwise errors will occur.
Do the patches have to be in the 2.6.23 folder when I issue the command #patch -p1 < patch-2.6.23.1? This is where the info is a bit conflicting. Some say YES the patches must be in the kernel folder to be patched and No if you give the path to them?
I can not seem to get passed the first patch without getting the following error:
Quote:
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
|
If I enter "Y" then I get a number of questions to answer yes no to? I just assumed that I would install without problems and then move onto the compiling!!
Is there something I am missing that I haven't thought of?
bookie